All you are doing is listing a bunch of Q-Anon forum baloney.
I feel the stuff I listed is legitimately concerning.
If any of it had any real weight, you would have won suits or gotten successful criminal prosecutions.
From my experience with court cases, I think the real court system doesn't work as forthrightly.
When you win suits and get convictions, I will take those claims seriously.
I hear you. That is reasonable.
To me, though, there are times when things are amiss, but there hasn't been a court case on it. And it is good for citizens at times to be suspicious when atypical stuff is going on.
I hope that citizens demand election processes that are transparent and easily auditable, and we get that. Instead of a system that has laughably huge vulnerabilities.
I understand, throwing around stuff on the internet is a lot more fun. You can claim everything and prove nothing.
True.
But lots of things are proven by analysis instead of court results. Risks of smoking, earth is round not flat, etc.
