All russia(spit) has to do is withdraw back to it's borders and stay there.
You are vastly oversimplifying, making an irrelevant distinction between controlling resources through occupying territory - which is not necessary - and not acknowledging the role certain nations and governments had ensuring that a war was the only possible conclusion. This goes back to before the breakup of the USSR.
Further, in another thread you said you always say what you see and think but you do not extend others the same courtesy hence it is not a discussion but an insistence on your perspective only, which isn't 'arguing'. Adding the spit every time you type Russian is unnecessary. Yes I should imagine they have been presented as a consistent evil since before you were born. That's plain bias and indoctrination. Americans have done very bad things too. Members of all nations have. Besides, which specific Russians do you mean? The dumb f3cks in the trenches some of whom don't seem the know where they were or what they were doing there or their leaders who have ordered them there, or every last one of them, men, women and children? Again it's a vast oversimplification. Nothing is that black and white.
Finally you have a tendency to use many informal fallacies that don't hold any weight in a debate. Accusing people of being Kremlin Janes or whatever or laughing at a source because of who they are is weak arguing. In academic circles it mostly negates the necessity for a response. It's not
who says a thing it's
what they said and in that case of the videos you laughed at you are actually mistaken, Russel Brand is neither here nor there, that was the former prime minister of Israel whose visits and content of those meetings were documented at the time.
The civilized community of nations simply can’t tolerate that kind of aggression in the 21st century.
If this is a humanitarian intervention of self-defence against a violent aggressor then how come not a single finger has been lifted to intervene in Myanmar where civilians are similarly being violently suppressed by an anti-democratic junta as we speak. It is in fact the exact opposite. Many developed nations of the world including the US are selling weapons directly knowing full well who they're going to be used on. This is also a matter of UN record, despite the fact that several of the nations selling weapons are UN member states. It is therefore not the protection of innocent civilians that are the motivations. That's what you call a proof by contradiction.
Why don't we face it: the present model of human society depends on perpetual war, unjust and unwise distribution of resources, both natural and human without any balance and governments are merely an intermediary between those non-democratic entities who are as hell-bent on enslaving every resource the planet has to offer - including it's people - in the same way Major Kong rides the nuke in, hooting and hollering as he goes. It is highly likely a Fermi-paradox event is the end-game to this cycle. How can it be stopped as long as people's minds are so easily manipulated? Is it not odd that many of the posts herein are discussing which media outlet can be trusted and to what extent? You have to think for yourself. Get the tools and use them.
