It is not one thing, it is the thing. If you aren't privvy to the evidence (I thought you were) then smply look at the timeline of recent events:
Well there is a time line, but it only includes entirely unrelated events with no particular connection between them or the people involved. I’ll highlight the spurious logic one point at a time:
Skyyr posts a video criticising Lazer's ACM (right before his ban was lifted and later deleted). Badboy (official forum account) then posts that Skyyr's explanation is entirely incorrect and is just a personal attack.
If you are talking about this thread, that’s also what I saw:
Literally, this has changed my outlook on dogfighting.
I saw that thread, but it has nothing to do with me.
Then this video shows up from Gunzo,
The video in the original post to this thread didn’t just show up, it was posted shortly after the incident shown in the video occurred, and as a direct result of it. The incident was the motive for posting, nothing else. It was posted because Skyyr appeared to be up to his old tricks. That was the only motive necessary and a pretty obvious one too.
So those two points on your time line are not related. They involve separate and unrelated events and different people. You seem to think the two events are connected because you incorrectly believe they involve the same actors, you are seeing connections that don’t exist and missing the obvious one.
But the best part is the sequence of events you have described rule out your motive theory entirely. You say “Then this video shows up from Gunzo, then Skyyr posts a video” followed by "There is your motive for this thread" But if Skyyr posted a video after me, how could it have been my motive? If I posted my video first, there must have been some prior motive. There was, I posted the video to show what had just happened in the MA, plain and simple. Occam's razor in action.
Then this video shows up from Gunzo, then Skyyr posts a video of one of Badboy's other shade accounts in the MA and a full ahf of them duelling. There is your motive for this thread in a 99.968847993759927% nutshell.
I’ve seen a video that mentions Gunzo in the title, but none of the names in the title actually appear in the video
I assume one is a Skyyr shade but neither of them are me. Anyone can post a video with an unknown player and claim they are someone else in the film’s title
So I was supposed to be motivated by a video of some one else? Particular since the real motive is so glaringly obvious, saw it happen, posted it
in a 99.968847993759927% nutshell.
Really? Making stuff up?
Here are some numbers that aren't made up:
Your motive theory = 100% wrong
Then making up some random numbers to back it up = 100% fake?
Now we know you like to make stuff up, what else have you just made up because it suits you?
Here’s a final number… Your Credibility = 0%
Badboy cannot out-fly Skyyr
That may be true, but how would I know? I’ve never seen them fight and never seen a film of them fighting. Does that film even exist?
On the other hand every time I’ve encountered Skyyr, he was comfortably out flown, just as he was in the video I posted here. The video in the original post to this thread is at least a genuine Gunzo v Skyyr film. Don’t be taken in by fake videos just because someone typed Gunzo in the film title. I can see how it happens though.
For example, earlier in this thread Vraciu posted a message by mistake and deleted it claiming it was intended as PM to you saying that I had hunted him and that he had killed me twice in return. Problem is none of his kills or deaths during the entire tour had me on the list? So thanks to that kind of complete nonsense propagated via behind the scenes gossip, there are probably more fake Gunzo shade names than there are players in the game
Not complaining, some of it is complimentary, some of it funny, but I really shouldn’t take the credit for all the hard work and kills earned by what is apparently a vast army of shades generated by butt hurt paranoia.
I think that covers your main points. But I want to conclude by revisiting something you said earlier:
It is not one thing, it is the thing. If you aren't privvy to the evidence
The problem with evidence is that if you want to use it you have to be sure it's solid. You don't even appear to have read it back to see if it even made sense.
What you posted as evidence was a joke. You seem to be unable to distinguish between things you know are true facts and things you only think or want to believe are true. That’s where your time line evidence falls apart, the events aren’t related because the connections you are making between the players aren’t real. You have been reasoning from what you merely think is true as you have throughout this thread. Your resulting conclusions are all non sequitur. A classic case of rubbish in, rubbish out.
Meanwhile you have focused on a ten year old butt kicking you received in the DA by a number of different players that you still think were all me, supported by a long list of names. The strange thing about that is:
I don’t recall ever seeing you online, let alone ever fighting you. You post like you are so target fixated you can’t think or see straight. You can’t even follow the sequence of events in your own time line and then resorted to making stuff up
Goodness knows what other nonsense you are fermenting in your effort to connect the dots that aren't there.
Meanwhile this bears repeating, in case you didn’t notice there was a further witness report, more evidence in from yet another player who has observed Skyyr doing the same things, if not even more damning, and has resulted in an updated probability of guilt at the even more staggering 99.999921%.
The odds of Skyyr being innocent = 1.27 Million to one against.Bring back that lovin' feelin'
Whoa, that lovin' feelin'
Bring back that lovin' feelin'
'Cause it's gone, gone, gone
And I can't go on, whoa-oh
TopGunzo
