Not at all! It was my reaction to his statement, "Am I saying we target players? Nope."
While there's no rule against targeting people, it must get wearying if you're repeatedly the target. I have difficulty grasping the purpose of the exercise.
"Allegedly" if you please.
In general, it seems it would be people who have talked crap about someone and they need to have their attitude adjusted.
If someone claims someone has no skill, knows nothing about ACM, can't win without hack or a massive alt advantage or just got a lucky kill once...and they won't meet in the DA to prove it, then maybe they get accidentally "found" in the MA.
If someone does go to the DA, and loses repeatedly and still won't admit they were wrong and won't go back to the DA for more convincing, then maybe they get accidentally "found" in the MA.
I could see that being one scenario.
I doubt in such an "alleged" case, the targets are just drawn out of a hat.
So I guess maybe don't talk crap about someone's skillz, or be able to back it up in the DA. And if the DA proves unsuccessful, be willing to retract and not just stomp off and double down on what you can't back up?
