Yeah Ive casually read over the last few years here and there where a few scientist had qualms with some of Einsteins stuff. I haven't quite got into the weeds of QM. Much of it is very high over my head. I like to keep an open mind about that kind of stuff because as soon as someone says "the science is settled" there is always something smaller or another phenomenon we see through a new lens that essentially "unsettles it" or takes it even further. IMO, we have come a long way, but there are many many things we have yet to understand and discover that will shape the scope of "science". Im open to many possibilities about the earth and space and aliens. Ive watched a LOT of interviews by folks claiming to know something and maybe everyone single one is full of watermelon in one way or another. Its amazing though the agreement out there about specific alien names, like the archturians, greys, pleiadians, Anunnaki ect. Looking at many past relics with pictures, it certainly is interesting where humans got the idea for some of these stone tablet drawings, and other carvings we see from history, as well as what the organization's hiding artifacts from us, won't tell us becasue it might reshape some of societies ideas. That to me is extremely troubling since it shows they are trying to spin a narrative of history rather than allow humanity to understand that there were certain events that reshaped humanity and civilizations beyond current mainstream understanding.
