I love his reviews. It helps cut through all the opinions. At least he has extensive experience with high performance planes.
I agree with his overall impression from a layman's view.
The FM feels a little more forgiving than DCS in stalls and spins. But close. Not enough difference to bother me.
shocks seem a bit too bouncy.
But overall they did a much better job than GB. It has "that feel" that DCS broke me for other sims. DCS had great feel but marginal gameplay. I have had a blast even just flying the limited content of the Early Access.
The gunnery feels awesome, and the 50's shred like they are supposed to.
I still have hopes for Combat Pilot one day, but they are several years off. Williams is gone. A lot an happen to kill a new sim over years of development. IL2K is drawing from a GB revenue base so they are able to fund development.
No bucks, no Buck Rogers.
I always heard GB had great gameplay, but it just didn't have "the feel" I wanted.
This version comes very close. I think it good that DCS get some serious competition. Best thing for both companies. DCS has gotten a little complacent. IL2K is the only thing I see at the moment that can give them serious competition.
But sadly they don't have helo. DCS will be my rotary wing sim.
Man I'd love to see them use this engine for a Battle of Britain remake. The Fusion guys did what they could with what they had, but this is clearly a superior engine.