Author Topic: Wanted: Better Collision detection.  (Read 4853 times)

Offline CptTrips

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9971
Re: Wanted: Better Collision detection.
« Reply #60 on: September 18, 2026, 10:06:23 AM »
No, it can't be.

Because HT would never allow something so stupid.

And it's spelled "clique", genius.
Toxic, psychotic, self-aggrandizing drama queens simply aren't worth me spending my time on.

Offline Animl-AW

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7655
Re: Wanted: Better Collision detection.
« Reply #61 on: September 18, 2026, 10:11:54 AM »
No, it can't be.

Because HT would never allow something so stupid.

And it's spelled "clique", genius.

Then it’s a choice, moron. You’re a kiddy script writer. You really don’t know half if what you blab about trying to look snart

Nothing made me laugh harder than it taking you 1 yr to realize when I told you Nick at DCS us ripping everyone off, and it taking a year for your midget mind to figure it out and admit. You’re slow.
Mniw pedal iff to your young men, and keep your mental disease to yourself.
AH Tech Hangar
Windows Gaming Tweaks

Offline Wiley

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8362
Re: Wanted: Better Collision detection.
« Reply #62 on: September 18, 2026, 10:13:59 AM »
Can it be coded in or not

Reading comprehension isn't your strong suit, is it?

Very good!  You've grasped it is a choice!

Now, explain why the other choices are better and why their downsides are superior to the current one.

And to be clear, no it cannot be coded to work magically as you desire.

Wiley.
« Last Edit: September 18, 2026, 10:25:44 AM by Wiley »
If you think you are having a 1v1 in the Main Arena, your SA has failed you.

JG11

Offline CptTrips

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9971
Re: Wanted: Better Collision detection.
« Reply #63 on: September 18, 2026, 10:28:44 AM »
Now, explain why the other choices are better and why their downsides are superior to the current one.

Oh, this ought to be good.

Toxic, psychotic, self-aggrandizing drama queens simply aren't worth me spending my time on.

Offline Animl-AW

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7655
Re: Wanted: Better Collision detection.
« Reply #64 on: September 18, 2026, 10:30:39 AM »
Reading comprehension isn't your strong suit, is it?

Very good!  You've grasped it is a choice!

Now, explain why the other choices are better and why their downsides are superior to the current one.

Wiley.

The question should have been answered in your first post. Instead you drag it out like an old nsh at a tea party. Because you like looking cool talking snout FE. Over and over and over.

If it can be coded in to FE reporting you just wasted everyone’s time with repeats. I got off that thread for days snd you guys posting as if I’m actually still reading it.

Its not as much about FE as it is about choice.
If the messages of clision can be coded in so can mutual damage.

So get off the FE grammy award.




AH Tech Hangar
Windows Gaming Tweaks

Offline Wiley

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8362
Re: Wanted: Better Collision detection.
« Reply #65 on: September 18, 2026, 10:32:33 AM »
Oh, this ought to be good.

I'm predicting more mindless gainsaying with absolutely no detail, coupled with a restatement of "both planes should go down!" in some fashion, and no acknowledgement of how he or his legions of supporters would feel about colliding with the invisible planes, likely because he still doesn't understand that.

Wiley.
If you think you are having a 1v1 in the Main Arena, your SA has failed you.

JG11

Offline Animl-AW

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7655
Re: Wanted: Better Collision detection.
« Reply #66 on: September 18, 2026, 10:33:52 AM »
Oh, this ought to be good.

Dude , or excuse me Dudett, you suffer greatly from dunning-kruger effect. All the crap ypu  blab about and predict became wrong.

You are a serious moron
AH Tech Hangar
Windows Gaming Tweaks

Offline Wiley

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8362
Re: Wanted: Better Collision detection.
« Reply #67 on: September 18, 2026, 10:37:32 AM »
you suffer greatly from dunning-kruger effect.

 :huh

This may be the least self-aware statement and largest instance of projection I have ever seen on the internet.  And I've seen things.

Wow.

Wiley.
If you think you are having a 1v1 in the Main Arena, your SA has failed you.

JG11

Offline Animl-AW

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7655
Re: Wanted: Better Collision detection.
« Reply #68 on: September 18, 2026, 10:38:13 AM »
I'm predicting more mindless gainsaying with absolutely no detail, coupled with a restatement of "both planes should go down!" in some fashion, and no acknowledgement of how he or his legions of supporters would feel about colliding with the invisible planes, likely because he still doesn't understand that.

Wiley.

You are obsessed with this invisible plane crap. What, you saw it once? I never saw any of what you claim. Not once.

What is your experience in programming?




AH Tech Hangar
Windows Gaming Tweaks

Offline CptTrips

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9971
Re: Wanted: Better Collision detection.
« Reply #69 on: September 18, 2026, 10:39:28 AM »
 :rofl


He is so dense, he is becoming a black-hole.
Toxic, psychotic, self-aggrandizing drama queens simply aren't worth me spending my time on.

Offline Animl-AW

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7655
Re: Wanted: Better Collision detection.
« Reply #70 on: September 18, 2026, 10:40:02 AM »
:huh

This may be the least self-aware statement and largest instance of projection I have ever seen on the internet.  And I've seen things.

Wow.

Wiley.

Ok its evident, you’re just another punk on bbs. You only know what others say. You know nothing in depth. Shut it
AH Tech Hangar
Windows Gaming Tweaks

Offline Dadtallica

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2567
Re: Wanted: Better Collision detection.
« Reply #71 on: September 18, 2026, 10:40:50 AM »
Admiral Anecdotal strikes again!

Why does he always revert to homoerotic insults?
October Player Poll Results

Back in 2022 after a loooooong break from 2010. Old name Ratpack, same for the BBS. Old squads, Excaliburs, 172nd Rabid Dawgs.

Offline Animl-AW

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7655
Re: Wanted: Better Collision detection.
« Reply #72 on: September 18, 2026, 10:42:16 AM »
:rofl


He is so dense, he is becoming a black-hole.

Go ahead CptGacey. Pedal off and squeeze your panties out, fraud.
AH Tech Hangar
Windows Gaming Tweaks

Offline Animl-AW

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7655
Re: Wanted: Better Collision detection.
« Reply #73 on: September 18, 2026, 10:44:23 AM »
Admiral Anecdotal strikes again!

Why does he always revert to homoerotic insults?

Because CptGacey has perv issues

You have drug issues

Ya, I always listen to drug adficts

Stay on subject mini mind
AH Tech Hangar
Windows Gaming Tweaks

Offline CptTrips

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9971
Re: Wanted: Better Collision detection.
« Reply #74 on: September 18, 2026, 10:45:22 AM »
First he'll try and impress us by telling us how he almost single-handedly ran AW.

If that doesn't work, he'll whip out a sob story about how hard a life he's had in a lame attempt to whip up cheap internet forum sympathy.

So gross, on so many levels.
Toxic, psychotic, self-aggrandizing drama queens simply aren't worth me spending my time on.