Why dies that even matter. TheF is wrong with you? I didn’t hide it, HT doesn’t hide it, CotGacy does. You want a Fin solition or attack the the source, eho gives a flying F? Oh, IDIOT punks do. Fin MORONS
nIm
Only ine dn oerson kniws wgats in the code. Sit down and shut it, worthless to life trolls
Stripping away the typos, acronyms, and aggressive tone, the sender is expressing extreme frustration over a technical debate or software bug and trying to communicate two main points:
1. "Focus on fixing the problem, not arguing over who caused it."
"Why dies that even matter. TheF is wrong with you?" \rightarrow Why does that even matter? What the f is wrong with you?*
"I didn’t hide it, HT doesn’t hide it, CotGacy does." \rightarrow They are naming specific individuals or screen names (themselves, "HT", and "CotGacy"), claiming that they and HT weren't obfuscating or hiding code/information, but CotGacy was.
"You want a Fin solition or attack the the source, eho gives a flying F?" \rightarrow Do you want a fing solution or do you just want to attack the source? Who gives a flying f*?* They are arguing that finding a fix matters more than assigning blame.
"Oh, IDIOT punks do. Fin MORONS" \rightarrow Oh, idiot punks do. F*ing morons.
2. "Only one person actually understands the codebase."
"nIm" \rightarrow Typo, likely a mistyped filler or part of the handle name.
"Only ine dn oerson kniws wgats in the code." \rightarrow Only one damn person knows what's in the code. (They are likely referring to themselves or a single lead developer as the only person who actually understands how the software works).
"Sit down and shut it, worthless to life trolls" \rightarrow Sit down and shut up, you worthless-to-life trolls.
Core Message
The person feels unfairly blamed or targeted by commentators/trolls in an online forum, Discord, or GitHub thread. They are telling critics to stop arguing over who hid or broke what, step back, and let the one developer who actually understands the source code fix the problem.
