Ai moderation?

[JimmyD3]

The suggestion, that there is an "Agreement" between 2 countries to pommel the 3rd country is absolutely absurd. It happens as a result of game play. Who in this game has been approached by a player on another country, IN GAME, in an effort to instigated this "Agreement"?

[Chris79]

The suggestion, that there is an "Agreement" between 2 countries to pommel the 3rd country is absolutely absurd. It happens as a result of game play. Who in this game has been approached by a player on another country, IN GAME, in an effort to instigated this "Agreement"?

Some maps facilitate the gangbang.

[JimmyD3]

Some maps facilitate the gangbang.

Would not argue that point at all, but that is not what is being stated. There is no such thing as the "perfect" map, period. Some maps are more conducive to air combat, some to bomber missions, and some for gv. The idea that there is a map that would be just what "everyone" wanted, is a dream. Maybe a good dream, but a dream none the less.

[Dadtallica]

Another one of your blanket statements. Everyone is looking at it from their own perspective? You have no idea about that.


Personally, I don't even care about the numbers being balanced. Not even at all. I'm trying to help the game and find a solution. I'm seeing what Shane is saying that's happening in the mornings and and times when there's low numbers and squads are embedded into a certain country and causing that country to be always having the numbers for several hours a day. That doesn't help the game or the man who made the game's pocketbook does it?


I'm actually looking at it from the perspective of helping the game. It seems to me that you are worried about your personal enjoyment of the game over the enjoyment of the game for everybody else as a whole.

Anyway I hope that AI gets to decide. It'll decide because AI is wonderful right?

It can analyze which squads are the problem actually and move those around as a priority. Get them off of the fence and get them a good kick in the bellybutton to do something selfless for a change.

Then you’re not reading this thread, including many other others try it.

This is a decades, old argument. I promise this isn’t just for clicks I’m not making it up.

[Shane]

Then you’re not reading this thread, including many other others try it.

This got de-railed from moderation to general gameplay and specific mechanics.

I have different thoughts on Ai moderation, whether in-game or forum.     And it seems I found an unannounced tweak to the .rpt function. 

[Dadtallica]

This got de-railed from moderation to general gameplay and specific mechanics.

I have different thoughts on Ai moderation, whether in-game or forum.     And it seems I found an unannounced tweak to the .rpt function. 

lol might have been a Shane specific tweak!

Also, I’m one of the handful of people that actually takes the time to travel to the other side of the map and fight the other two countries if nobody’s close in my countries in a horde or quiet. If I see the rook ganging up one side, I go on the other side... usually I find Randy1 starting a fight!

And like I’ve said earlier if you all decide to come on over to the Rook side, I’ll still clear your six.

Even you Animl… even you!

[Dadtallica]

The suggestion, that there is an "Agreement" between 2 countries to pommel the 3rd country is absolutely absurd. It happens as a result of game play. Who in this game has been approached by a player on another country, IN GAME, in an effort to instigated this "Agreement"?

I definitely do remember back in the day that two countries would “agree” team up so to speak to stop a hoard or a map reset but. It was usually just a big squad, switching sides, or having some of their players hit another side, etc.

It wasn’t exactly coordinated. I’ll check my spam filter to see if I’ve been getting emails asking me to conspire against the knights.

[-gg-]

Then you’re not reading this thread, including many other others try it.

This is a decades, old argument. I promise this isn’t just for clicks I’m not making it up.

I love how you try to come off as some authority figure and dismiss everything. Oh trust me this is a decade's old argument. Yeah? You don't think that I've been around for decades? I played this game since around 2001. I'm very familiar with everything. Just as much as you are or more.

So if you don't have an argument for something it's not cool to just say oh trust me I know. That's not an argument.

I'm making a suggestion that Dale can read and decide upon himself. He's obviously reading these threads and he's already made some changes. Maybe the decades-old arguments are wrong. Ever think of  that? Maybe they're not right for the game now as it sits today. Ever think of that?

[Dadtallica]

Yes, you seem to be arguing a point I’m not making.

This isn’t a right or wrong discuss discussion. It’s of a single persons individual subjective reasoning.

Everybody makes a personal value proposition when they pay for this game every month. If the new operating procedure is, everybody gets auto switched then I would probably play or pay less often. Whether or not you care about that, I promise you I’m not alone. I’m not even the only one on just this thread to say it!

You can also count me in the crowd of people who kinda like things the way they are and don’t really need major changes to enjoy the game at all and yes, that’s my personal subjectivity. I don’t think the game needs more people. I’m sure Dale would like that for his checkbook and I’m all for that if that’s what he needs, but it doesn’t bother me. Once the arena hits around 60 to 70 people, I usually log off anyway.

Am I wrong then?

[AKIron]

I, for one, welcome our AI forum moderators.

[Shane]

I, for one, welcome our AI forum moderators.

AiTech! or SkuzzAi?   I'm going with SkuzzAi.

[Dadtallica]

AiTech! or SkuzzAi?   I'm going with SkuzzAi.

I mean, Dale has everything he needs to create a personality construct of someone with an AI chat for sure. The total number of transcripts he must have in his possession for everyone ever involved in the game or the BBS is probably pretty freaking cool. 

I was making chatbots for Burger King with Microsoft power agent about a year before the AI boom happened. Dale could easily have that done. Now we all talk to bots for support all the time. I can’t imagine if I had had AI when I was doing that. It would’ve been an absolute game changer. Writing decision trees is a tedious operation.

[Shane]

I mean, Dale has everything he needs to create a personality construct of someone with an AI chat for sure. The total number of transcripts he must have in his possession for everyone ever involved in the game or the BBS is probably pretty freaking cool. 

I was making chatbots for Burger King with Microsoft power agent about a year before the AI boom happened. Dale could easily have that done. Now we all talk to bots for support all the time. I can’t imagine if I had had AI when I was doing that. It would’ve been an absolute game changer. Writing decision trees is a tedious operation.

So, what would you ask the AH Oracle of Delphai?

[Dadtallica]

So, what would you ask the AH Oracle of Delphai?

Is there really a spoon?

[Dinan]

You people take this way too seriously lol.  It’s almost pathetic.  Take it or leave it.  It’s clear homeboy doesn’t care much about player input.  Should’ve realized that a long time ago.