While you're up there on that moral high point Kratzer... just note who is calling whom names and questioning intelligence and stuff.
As far as cliche responses are concerned, I'm a little tired of the ol' "You're just threatened by your repressed feelings" response to anyone that opposes homosexuality. I've said it doesn't belong in schools and I think it's abnormal. That is all. YOU have read into it whatever it is your agenda is calling for.
Seeker's comparison of gay men grabbing bellybutton in a bar seemed ok to you, why not my comparison to pedophiles? You object because pedophiles "hurt children"? That wasn't my point. My point is, "Do pedophiles choose to be pedophiles?" Kinda puts them right there with gays, doesn't it?
I said there is no physiological reason to be gay- got evidence to the contrary? My evidence against it is the design and purpose of genitalia? And you have....?
What's left then? Pyschological or environmental, right? Now then, pychological suggests one can be cured, assuming this is an affliction one desires to shed. OTOH, if a person is gay because of their environment, it would seem we could turn people gay by placing them in an environment conducive to such an event. Get my drift? Either way we go, it doesn't belong in school.
You see, to me no matter how you look at it this isn't something I wish to expose anyone's kids to, especially not mine. Your argument is we need tolerance- and Tah Gut was even kind enough to link my line of thinking to bin Laden (talk about over the top!). I am tolerant, but only to a point. I refuse to believe we need to teach gay or lesbian studies in a public school setting.
Edit: Attributed the bin Laden remark to the wrong guy.