otter you dont read much eh?
ju88 is a bomber, has no forward guns to be of any use straffing and is a 1940 model with very low powered engines.
allied equivalent? b26 from 1942/43? b17 from 1944...mossie/p47/p38 etc all late war models.
however this post seems to have turned sour with all those that dont want 190s with their historical loadouts accusing those that are asking for them of the cardinal sin of greed for actually ASKING (heaven forbid) for them!.oooh we so bad.

well if you read a post in aircraft and vehicles you will see pyro has posted that he is looking into some more loadout options on the 190s time permitting so thats all i needed to hear.Discussion closed for me

P.s funked if 3x 250 was overloaded? but its only 50kg more than whats on there now.
500+2x250kg you mean? but even then i think you are wrong as there was a varient (190F8/U3) fitted with TSA bomb sight for anti shipping strikes that carried a BT700 (1,543lb[700kg]) or the BT1400 (3,086lb [1400kg!]) weapon.
also the 190G-1 fighter-bomber was derived from the fw190a5, but carried a 3,968lb [1800kg!] bomb which necessitated strenthened landing gear: wingmounted armament was reduced to 2x mg151/20 cannon, and the junkers-designed wingracks accomodated 2 66-imp gal (300 litre) drop tanks.
so thats 1800kg + whatever 2x300litre DTs weigh and it wasnt overloaded.
3x250kg overloaded? I think bullsheeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeet

.