« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2 3   Go Down

Author Topic: german bomber  (Read 916 times)

Offline crossjob

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 10
german bomber
« on: February 14, 2002, 11:26:48 AM »
in AH is only the JU88.
We need some more german bomber like He177 or "Volksjäger"
Logged

Offline jan

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 44
german bomber
« Reply #1 on: February 14, 2002, 01:39:47 PM »
the ju87 and he111 plz.
Logged

Offline keyapaha

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 561
german bomber
« Reply #2 on: February 14, 2002, 03:01:57 PM »
ju 188 would be nice
Logged

Offline brady

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7055
      • http://personal.jax.bellsouth.net/jax/t/y/tyr88/JG2main.html
german bomber
« Reply #3 on: February 14, 2002, 11:19:17 PM »
He 177
Logged

Offline funkedup

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9466
      • http://www.raf303.org/
german bomber
« Reply #4 on: February 14, 2002, 11:28:01 PM »
He 111
I'd love to make those burn with my Hurri I.  :)
Logged

Offline Wilbus

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4472
german bomber
« Reply #5 on: February 15, 2002, 02:28:10 AM »
We need something that can survive and drop OK loads aswell, HE177. the HE111 is even a bigger victim then our Ju88 now. JU188 a bit faster and better armed then Ju88.
Logged
Rasmus "Wilbus" Mattsson

Liberating Livestock since 1998, recently returned from a 5 year Sheep-care training camp.

Offline MANDOBLE

  • Parolee
  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1849
      • http://www.terra.es/personal2/matias.s
german bomber
« Reply #6 on: February 15, 2002, 04:36:28 AM »
With more than 13000 lb bombload or two guided missiles (Hs 293), I vote for He177 (faster than Ju188).

Or Do217, with a bombload of 8500 lb and even faster than He177.
Logged

Offline crossjob

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 10
yupp
« Reply #7 on: February 15, 2002, 08:46:26 AM »
its nice what is written but we need a good bomber fast, great altitude, and a bombload like lanc or b17

i vote for He177 and He111
Logged

Offline K West

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1445
german bomber
« Reply #8 on: February 15, 2002, 09:02:45 AM »
HE-177!

Westy
Logged

Offline ergRTC

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1632
      • http://bio2.elmira.edu/DMS/index.pl?table=content&faculty=1&page=1
german bomber
« Reply #9 on: February 15, 2002, 10:00:42 AM »
Anybody got a pick of the he177?

I would really love to see it.
Logged

Offline Raubvogel

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3882
german bomber
« Reply #10 on: February 15, 2002, 10:20:18 AM »
Logged

Offline MANDOBLE

  • Parolee
  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1849
      • http://www.terra.es/personal2/matias.s
german bomber
« Reply #11 on: February 15, 2002, 10:35:45 AM »
Logged

Offline Wilbus

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4472
german bomber
« Reply #12 on: February 15, 2002, 10:57:52 AM »
HE 111 can't carry much load at all, it was an early war bomber. Bout 5000 lbs or so.
Slow and poor armement, like our JU88 but slower.

I vote for HE-177 for sure.

WITH  FRITZ X!!
Logged
Rasmus "Wilbus" Mattsson

Liberating Livestock since 1998, recently returned from a 5 year Sheep-care training camp.

Offline Vermillion

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4012
german bomber
« Reply #13 on: February 15, 2002, 12:32:57 PM »
Why would the Luftwaffe fan base want a He-177 instead of a Ju-188 ?

I thought the Ju-188 was faster, carried a bigger load, and was actually used more?
Logged

Offline K West

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1445
german bomber
« Reply #14 on: February 15, 2002, 01:04:42 PM »
I don't claim any partisanship with any fan base :)   But IMO the JU-188 is to much like the earlier JU-88.  Where as the HE-177 is completely different, good overall qualities, just as usefull and it's also more exotic. (sue me for that last one! :)   And so is the JU-288C.  I'd rather a Ju-288 than a 188.   A JU-188 would be like a having a different model of the Ford Taurus which  we already have ;)

 Westy
Logged
Pages: [1] 2 3   Go Up
« previous next »