Author Topic: 11 old boy kills robber with a .45  (Read 2597 times)

Offline Ripsnort

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 27251
Re: Not Again!
« Reply #75 on: February 20, 2002, 12:21:04 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by midnight Target


Don't be so sure about that.


You're posting right?  Without Number 2, you don't have Number 1. ;)

Offline SirLoin

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5705
Re: Re: Ban Handguns!!!
« Reply #76 on: February 20, 2002, 12:34:34 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by BigMax


 

"If we made handguns illegal, the "black market" gun sales would skyrocket... "

I was going to go away on this thread but I can't resist...

YES I CAN RESIST!!!.....I believe.......that handguns.......should be banned because... they are a danger to.....AHHHHHHHHHRRRRRGGGGG!!!!.......

I reserve comment on the topic of handguns...(I know I have to take responsibility for my terrorist activity on this thread...  )...:eek: ....POOF!
« Last Edit: March 01, 2002, 10:32:50 AM by SirLoin »
**JOKER'S JOKERS**

Offline funkedup

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9466
      • http://www.raf303.org/
11 old boy kills robber with a .45
« Reply #77 on: February 20, 2002, 06:49:06 PM »
Animal, go to your room with no dinner for thinking the SA-80 is cool.  Ever wonder why the SAS use M16 and M4?  SA-80 is a piece of junk.

Offline midnight Target

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15114
Re: Re: Not Again!
« Reply #78 on: February 20, 2002, 08:14:31 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Ripsnort


You're posting right?  Without Number 2, you don't have Number 1. ;)


Besides the fact that there is no way to show that your statement is true, what I was refering to was the constitutional debate over the interpretation of the 2nd amendment.

But please expand on how my "right to bear arms" has maintained my right to gather and speak freely.

Offline N1kPaz

  • Parolee
  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 487
11 old boy kills robber with a .45
« Reply #79 on: February 20, 2002, 08:23:16 PM »
why does everyone always seem to focus on the isolated instances of firearm accidents that occasionally occur? Lets think about the positive aspects of firearm ownership for a moment.

There seems to be a certain feeling of security that comes from knowing you can defend your home with lethal force if necessary.

Imagine an alarm system that gave silent warning to the sleeping occupants of the house. It could wake you up, giving you ample time to load your weapon before the burglar gets near your bedroom. Silently creeping through the house in slippers and wearing a robe, you can ambush the burlar when he turns the corner into the hallway.

A .22 revolver will do if big guns are scary. You just point it at the face of the intruder and let er rip. One 22 round might not be too bad, but I bet 6 in a row could hurt someone.

Offline Thrawn

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6972
11 old boy kills robber with a .45
« Reply #80 on: February 20, 2002, 08:41:51 PM »
I don't think we are concentrating on the isolated accident, N1kPaz.  I think we are cocentrating on the relatively vast number of assaults and murders, using firearms, in the US.

Offline Animal

  • Parolee
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5027
11 old boy kills robber with a .45
« Reply #81 on: February 20, 2002, 08:47:19 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by funkedup
Animal, go to your room with no dinner for thinking the SA-80 is cool.  Ever wonder why the SAS use M16 and M4?  SA-80 is a piece of junk.



Screw you, I never even mentioned that piece of crap. That was Tac.
I will never praise anything made by the British.

Offline Thrawn

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6972
11 old boy kills robber with a .45
« Reply #82 on: February 20, 2002, 08:51:33 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Animal
H&K G36
THE rifle of the new millenium.




Is it just me, or is this rifle pink?

Offline Animal

  • Parolee
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5027
11 old boy kills robber with a .45
« Reply #83 on: February 20, 2002, 08:54:32 PM »
yeah it does seem to have a pink reflection... its probably being used by the French.

Offline Elfenwolf

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1123
11 old boy kills robber with a .45
« Reply #84 on: February 20, 2002, 09:06:17 PM »
Has anybody forwarded this thread to the French yet? No doubt they'd surrender and Anamal would be named Grand Pierre.

Offline Nashwan

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1864
11 old boy kills robber with a .45
« Reply #85 on: February 20, 2002, 09:09:09 PM »
Quote
Screw you, I never even mentioned that piece of crap. That was Tac.
I will never praise anything made by the British.

Gues who owns and makes Heckler & Koch?
Royal Ordinance, part of British Aerospace :D

Offline Animal

  • Parolee
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5027
11 old boy kills robber with a .45
« Reply #86 on: February 20, 2002, 09:18:29 PM »
Damn liar - away with your and your deceiving words!

Offline Elfenwolf

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1123
11 old boy kills robber with a .45
« Reply #87 on: February 20, 2002, 09:36:56 PM »
Solyent Green is PEOPLE! Solyent Green is PEOPLE!

Offline Toad

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 18415
11 old boy kills robber with a .45
« Reply #88 on: February 20, 2002, 10:00:11 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Dowding
Toad, all those statistics prove is that London is 90% more of a toejamhole than it was before.

And anyone who has ever been there can tell you it wasn't much good to start with. :D I hate the place.


I've been there many times. I enjoyed each visit. Like any major city, it has places I wouldn't go in daylight, let alone after dark.

Quote
Note you concentrate on London only, which has always attracted the most violent types for many years.


So you're saying that since the confiscation in February of '98 that violent crime has only increased in London? The rest of the country hasn't seen a significant increase?


Quote
In terms of showing any kind of trend as a consequence of the banning of handguns I think it's far too early to tell either way.


Well...three years post-confiscation and the violent crime rate is up each year... seems to be a bit of a correlation rather than an abberation to me. After all, you pick up all the guns (or even just register them), you'd expect violent crime to go down right? That's what all the anti-gunners "sell" their registration/confiscation platforms on anyway. So far... not happening. It's not happening in Australia either, IIRC, since they confiscated.
If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude than the animated contest of freedom, go from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains sit lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen!

Offline Nashwan

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1864
11 old boy kills robber with a .45
« Reply #89 on: February 21, 2002, 06:40:16 AM »
Gun ownership levels in the UK in the nineties weren't high enough for banning to have any significant impact on firearm crime.

The handgun ban was simply a knee-jerk reaction to Dunblane.

Legaly bought guns weren't a significant problem in the UK, because unlike the US, they were registered. You couldn't sell a gun without transfering ownership to another licenced owner, so there was always a track on where a particular gun went.

The rise in crime in the UK (and yes, the rises are worst in London) has more to do with the lower numbers of police, the constraints placed on the police, and the very poor clear-up rate for crime.

Even then, then murder rate in London is a third that of New York, and abouth one fifteenth that of Washington DC.