What would you have done? Lemme ask you this, did sweden keep selling them the ore after the allied forces were liberating france?
Nope.. but tell me this.. knowing what they did, (turned a blind eye to ideologies, showed no spine, and just sold out) when they did it and why, how is it the Swedes get to play this tune:
Target: Hiroshima Nagasaki
Dead/Missing: 70000-80000 35000-40000
Wounded: 70000 40000
Population Density: 35000 per sq mile 65000 per sq mile
Total Casualties: 140000-150000 75000-80000
Area Destroyed: 4.7 sq mile 1.8 sq mile
Attacking Platform: 1 B-29 1 B-29
And all so the stupid morons could test their new toy...
Sure, one small reason was to save US soldiers lives but main reason was testing purpose
Rasmus "Wilbus" Mattsson
Location: SWEDEN
III/JG5 Eismeer
Livestock Liberation Front
Various others from Finland, Germany, France have chimed in with similar noises.
Yah know, in 1940, England, alone; was faced with the same choice the Swedes had. Seems they came to a different conclusion; and fought. The Swedes could have.. but they didn't.
So, Tac; I'd say BY your reasoning, England should have caved, too. But they didn't. I think the entire planet owes Winston and England a big vote of thanks. Don't you?
And Sweden, with its smug sanctimonius nazi cheerleader citizenry gets no 'attaboy' points from me for 'doing the right thing'. 'Neutrality' whilst sitting in the middle of a World War is a close cousin to 'social cowardice' in my book.
YOU CANNOT ENSLAVE A FREE MAN. THE MOST YOU CAN DO IS KILL HIM.[/I]