Author Topic: Whats this?  (Read 1683 times)

Offline -lynx-

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 340
Whats this?
« Reply #30 on: April 08, 2002, 07:57:05 AM »
Boroda - drop it, it's hopeless. A year or so ago we had this discussion, I posted sources/links (Finnish) to show exactly where Finland stood at the end of Winter War - no joy. In the end I just gave up - why bother arguing with people who are too brainwashed to understand facts?

Sage - my hat off to you. I could never figure out how nationalistic bravado, stupid lies and "interpretation of events" can serve to show respect to incredible skill and bravery Finnish soldiers and pilots showed defending their country against hopeless odds.

Offline Boroda

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5755
Whats this?
« Reply #31 on: April 08, 2002, 08:24:19 AM »
Lynx, I understand it. I'll say it isn't "brainwashing". It's self-hypnosis. It's much easier to believe that Finns could win and stop Red Army. And I understand it and will not blame any Finn for thinking this way. I only don't like that as usually they hang all dogs on evil Russians. USSR stated it's suggestions to Finland, and it could even be called a fair exchange. Border had to be  moved from Leningrad, and in summer, 1941, it saved the city, when Finns suddenly became allies of the nazis. Unfortunately for both countries - reasonable people in Finnish government were in minority...

Finns showed extraordinary heroism, and noone doubts it here in Russia.

Offline mipoikel

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3521
      • http://www.llv32.org
Whats this?
« Reply #32 on: April 08, 2002, 11:44:36 AM »
In summer 41 our troops stopped attacking and Mannerheim denied to attack Leningrad. Germany wanted Finns to keep on attack but Mannerheim was smart enough to stop it.

So I think your opinion of Leningrads safety is not right. Moving borders didnt save it.
I am a spy!

Offline Boroda

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5755
Whats this?
« Reply #33 on: April 08, 2002, 11:59:50 AM »
Hmm, maybe I missed something again? When I was born the city still was in place, not "wiped away from the face of Earth" as it was planned.

Even if Finns stoped and didn't attack Leningad - there were nazis who did it from Finnish territory. Correct me if I'm wrong.

BTW, did Finns really stop? Maybe they stoped only on Karelian Isthmus, or you think that ethnic Russians living in Karelia simply invited Finns and asked to place them in concentration camps?

Offline mipoikel

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3521
      • http://www.llv32.org
Whats this?
« Reply #34 on: April 08, 2002, 01:17:07 PM »
Deleted?? Hope so..

Unfortunately I didnt find any GOOD english web sites about this.

German forces were in northern finland, Lappland.

Finnish forces never attack vs Leningrad. Finnish pilots had orders NOT to go over Leningrad.
« Last Edit: April 08, 2002, 02:29:12 PM by mipoikel »
I am a spy!

Offline Dr Zhivago

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 576
Whats this?
« Reply #35 on: April 08, 2002, 01:24:43 PM »
Maybe this helps: Finland in World War II

Offline mrsid2

  • Parolee
  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1081
Whats this?
« Reply #36 on: April 08, 2002, 01:25:48 PM »
LOL mipo, the world would have been better off without EVER seeing that sorry excuse for a historical website.

It must have been written by a 12-year old.

Offline Boroda

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5755
Whats this?
« Reply #37 on: April 08, 2002, 01:53:16 PM »
BOOOO!!!

Now I agree with Lynx - it's propaganda, and a damn stupid propaganda.

Great Britain is in war against democratic Finland with dictatorship (The Soviet Union)!

It's definetly a joke of the month!

Then we read:

Hitler visits Finland and greets Mannerheim on his 75th birthday 4.6.1944

Great Britain should have joined this democratic leaders against the evil dictatorship! And poor Brits were on the wrong side all the way!


9.6.1944 Russians begin major attack on Karelian Isthmus. Vyborg is lost. Germans send weapon help to Finland. Finnish troops repel the Russian on Tali and Ihantala. Russians can`t occupy Finland. Finland and the Soviet Union make peace 19.9.1944.


No doubt that if Mannerheim decided not to stop at the old border - Russians should have run to the Pacific coast.

-Peace of Moskow (1940) border become valid, and Finland has to cede Petsamo

And all the land it occupied in 1941 too. What is a Finnish name for Petrozavodsk?

-Finland has to rent Porkkala to the Soviet Unions navalbase for 50 years.

How long did that 50 years last? Were you told at school that Nikita abandoned this base (BTW, a Russian Imperial Navy base, a part of a mine/artillery position protecting SPb from the sea) in the 50s?

Interesting... I never thought what happened to another rented base at Hanko (Gangut)... Will inquire, but looks like noone bothered to give it back.

-Finland has to sentence War culprit.
-Finland has to stop "fascists and Hitler-favouring" organisations.
 


This is definetly the sadest part. Evil, evil Russians!

JFYI: Finnish troops helped to close the ring around Leningrad.  If you happen to come to SPb - please, go to the Piskarevskoye memorial cemetary before you'll get too drunk. When you'll see all that tombs - you'll need it.

Sorry, I am very impolite :( But that page is very, very stupid. Who made it?

Offline Boroda

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5755
Whats this?
« Reply #38 on: April 08, 2002, 02:17:42 PM »
Dr Zhivago, good link, thanks!

Damn, that hallucination by Finnish Prime-Minister, and the answer from Pravda made me laugh :D

English translation doesn't sound nearly as funny as Russian original!

After this the clown stood on his head and threatened with his leg the Soviet Union, who he alleged is going to make an attempt on the independence of Finland. Such an imposing figure, indeed!

Ïîñëå ýòîãî øóò ãîðîõîâûé ñòàë íà ãîëîâó è ïîãðîçèë íîãîé Cîâåòñêîìó Ñîþçó, êîòîðûé áóäòî áû ïîêóøàåòñÿ íà íåçàâèñèìîñòü Ôèíëÿíäèè. Ïîçà ïîèñòèíå âåëè÷åñòâåííàÿ!


LOL!!! And I imagine THIS at the Pravda front page! ROFLMAO!!!

Sorry, couldn't resist it :) In the 70s-80s Pravda never afforded such brilliant humor.

Both the speech and the answer are so full of lies that it makes you think about all that crap that was poured into our brains :( And people believed it, and some people still do believe :(

Offline mipoikel

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3521
      • http://www.llv32.org
Whats this?
« Reply #39 on: April 08, 2002, 02:27:30 PM »
Sorry about that funny site, I didnt even read it before now. I just find it using google...:D  Rip is right, it must be witten some 12 yrs old kid..:o

Ty zhivago, good site.

:D
I am a spy!

Offline Wmaker

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5743
      • Lentolaivue 34 website
Whats this?
« Reply #40 on: April 08, 2002, 05:05:24 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by -lynx-
Boroda - drop it, it's hopeless. A year or so ago we had this discussion, I posted sources/links (Finnish) to show exactly where Finland stood at the end of Winter War - no joy. In the end I just gave up - why bother arguing with people who are too brainwashed to understand facts?

Sage - my hat off to you. I could never figure out how nationalistic bravado, stupid lies and "interpretation of events" can serve to show respect to incredible skill and bravery Finnish soldiers and pilots showed defending their country against hopeless odds.


lynx, you posted insults about finns comitting war crimes in Karelia. Just insults with no facts to back up your words. You still have nothing to prove your words.

I know exactly where Finland stood in the end of the Winter War.
I posted quotes from russian historian and a colonel. Both say Finland was fighting for its independence. It's obviously easier just to ingnore those words and resort to calling me brainwashed instead.

I have never said that if the Winter War would have prolonged that Soviet Union would not have been able to occupy Finland. What I said was that Stalin had a plan to occupy Finland quickly and when it didn't work he settled for Karelia and other regions.

Here's a quote of what I mean:

"Four months later, after the hardest fighting seen in Europe since the first World War and massive Soviet reinforcements, Finland's lines remained unbroken, while the Red Army had lost up to 400.000 soldiers in casualties. Finland's soldiers were now down to their last bullets, but Stalin did not know that, and he was running out of time. With the spring thaws approaching, his forces risked becoming bogged down in the extensive wetland forests along the front, while politically every week lost increased his humiliation and vulnerability vis a vis a vengeful Japan in the Far East, an ambitious Hitler in the west, and a Britain and France that were considering intervention on Finland's side.

In early March Stalin conceded defeat, abandoning his occupation plans and settling for a compromise agreement, leaving Finland independent. With the signing of the Peace Agreement on 13 March Finland had to cede 10 % of her territory to the USSR, but Finland herself remained free."

Written for Virtual Finland by Dr. Tomas Ries, senior researcher -
National Defence College - Finland

Source: http://virtual.finland.fi/finfo/english/war1.html

What makes you any more qualified to call me brainwashed than me calling you??

Quote
Originally posted by Boroda
Lynx, I understand it. I'll say it isn't "brainwashing". It's self-hypnosis. It's much easier to believe that Finns could win and stop Red Army. And I understand it and will not blame any Finn for thinking this way. I only don't like that as usually they hang all dogs on evil Russians. USSR stated it's suggestions to Finland, and it could even be called a fair exchange. Border had to be  moved from Leningrad, and in summer, 1941, it saved the city, when Finns suddenly became allies of the nazis. Unfortunately for both countries - reasonable people in Finnish government were in minority...

Finns showed extraordinary heroism, and noone doubts it here in Russia.


Boroda you too?? I was expecting more of you than this "self-hypnosis-thing". You too just ignore all the information that I posted and go personal?? If I didn't know better I'd say you are running out of ammo.

I never ever said that Finland won that war! Finland  LOST that war. I have never said otherwise. What I  said was that USSR couldn't occupy Finland the way Stalin had planned and because it didn't happen Stalin signed the peace treaty.

USSR started that war. If Finland would now start making regional demands at Russia would Russia just hand land over to Finland?!? Finland was the bad boy for not handing over its lands without a fight?!? There was nothing fair to that exchange and its sole purpose was occupation. If Finland would have agreed on it she would have ended up just like the Baltic countries!!

Well, considering who was running your country at the time I find this "unreasonable government-thing" very funny. Personally I think our war-time government was great and was a big factor in keeping my country independent.


Quote
Originally posted by Boroda
Maybe they stoped only on Karelian Isthmus, or you think that ethnic Russians living in Karelia simply invited Finns and asked to place them in concentration camps?


Hmm... this is interesting. Problem is that you don't have any proof this because what you say here never took place. Soviet propaganda all the way. As you asked me...any proof...web-sites,  quotes...anything? Hmm....I thought so.

Quote
Originally posted by Boroda
Great Britain is in war against democratic Finland with dictatorship (The Soviet Union)!


It's definetly a joke of the month!


Great Britain did declare war (allthough a formal war...only on paper...if we don't count for few incidents in the northern Finland) against Finland, you really didn't know this Boroda?!? About the dictatorship AFAIK Stalin was more or less a dictator, please correct me if I'm wrong.


Quote
Originally posted by Boroda
Hitler visits Finland and greets Mannerheim on his 75th birthday 4.6.1944

Great Britain should have joined this democratic leaders against the evil dictatorship! And poor Brits were on the wrong side all the way!


Hitler did indeed visit Mannerheim on his birthday. I don't remember the exact date or was it 75th birthday or not but otherwise that's true. I don't quite understand what you mean here.

Quote
Originally posted by Boroda
9.6.1944 Russians begin major attack on Karelian Isthmus. Vyborg is lost. Germans send weapon help to Finland. Finnish troops repel the Russian on Tali and Ihantala. Russians can`t occupy Finland. Finland and the Soviet Union make peace 19.9.1944.


No doubt that if Mannerheim decided not to stop at the old border - Russians should have run to the Pacific coast.


Soviets, begun their major attack 9.6.1944 on Karelian Isthmus. Finns lost Vyborg. Germans did send weapon help to Finland. Finnsh troops did repel the Soviet attack on Tali and Ihantala. Russians couldn't occupy Finland in the pace they had planned and turn their intrest on Berlin. Finland and Soviet Union did sign a peace treaty on 19.9.1944.

That's all true.

I don't understand your reply at all here. It does not make sense aat all.


Quote
Originally posted by Boroda
-Finland has to rent Porkkala to the Soviet Unions navalbase for 50 years.

How long did that 50 years last? Were you told at school that Nikita abandoned this base (BTW, a Russian Imperial Navy base, a part of a mine/artillery position protecting SPb from the sea) in the 50s?

Interesting... I never thought what happened to another rented base at Hanko (Gangut)... Will inquire, but looks like noone bothered to give it back.


Where did it say that Porkkala remained under soviets the whole 50 years? It said in the peace treaty that Finland has to rent Porkkala for 50 years.

Quote
Originally posted by Boroda
-Finland has to sentence War culprit.
-Finland has to stop "fascists and Hitler-favouring" organisations.


This is definetly the sadest part. Evil, evil Russians!


It is true that we had to find war culprits. Risto Ryti for example went to prison just because he was the president during the war and helped Finland remain independent.

Finland had to stop organisations like Lotta-Svärd and Suojeluskunta-organisation because of the pressure by the soviets. Finnish Air Force also had to give up Von Rosen Cross because of this.

Didn't read the page, just replied to the quotes you picked...don't know what else is there.

Boroda, you still gonna ignore my information and call me self-hypnotized?
« Last Edit: April 08, 2002, 05:20:35 PM by Wmaker »
Wmaker
Lentolaivue 34

Thank you for the Brewster HTC!

Offline mipoikel

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3521
      • http://www.llv32.org
Whats this?
« Reply #41 on: April 08, 2002, 05:14:43 PM »
And how about heroic soviet partizans who killed civilian women and children in northern finland. Whole villages were destroyed and population killed. Well unfortunately not english webpages about it...
I am a spy!

Offline mrsid2

  • Parolee
  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1081
Whats this?
« Reply #42 on: April 08, 2002, 06:07:23 PM »
It's really funny to see someone who probably grew up in the marxian-socialist educational system call US brainwashed.. LOL.

When I visited Estonia 15 years ago (it was then still under soviet occupation) I saw the nordic map in the war education classroom. War education? Yes, there were kalashnikovs and handgrenades etc. material in the 6th grade schoolclass. Students had to obey orders and line up in formations etc. normal military training procedures.

Anyway, there was a map on the wall where finland had no border with Soviet union.. The teacher couldn't explain what was the idea behind that map. He only smiled and spread his hands when asked. Well, that kinda symbolizes the 'truth' people have been told in the ex soviet union countries.

During those times there was only one truth, the official one approved by the party :)

Offline Boroda

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5755
Whats this?
« Reply #43 on: April 09, 2002, 07:20:00 AM »
"Four months later, after the hardest fighting seen in Europe since the first World War and massive Soviet reinforcements, Finland's lines remained unbroken, while the Red Army had lost up to 400.000 soldiers in casualties. Finland's soldiers were now down to their last bullets, but Stalin did not know that, and he was running out of time. With the spring thaws approaching, his forces risked becoming bogged down in the extensive wetland forests along the front, while politically every week lost increased his humiliation and vulnerability vis a vis a vengeful Japan in the Far East, an ambitious Hitler in the west, and a Britain and France that were considering intervention on Finland's side.

In early March Stalin conceded defeat, abandoning his occupation plans and settling for a compromise agreement, leaving Finland independent. With the signing of the Peace Agreement on 13 March Finland had to cede 10 % of her territory to the USSR, but Finland herself remained free."


It's all nothing more then fantasies of that "historian". Let's stick to the facts: USSR wanted to exchange Karelian Isthmus for the bigger territory in Karelia. When Finnish defence was broken - Finns agreed to that conitions, and Stalin stoped hostilities. He wasn't a stupid and didn't need the whole Finland.


Boroda you too?? I was expecting more of you than this "self-hypnosis-thing". You too just ignore all the information that I posted and go personal?? If I didn't know better I'd say you are running out of ammo.


Sorry, probable misunderstanding here. What I meant is that it's normal that you are proud of your country, and I'd be surprised if you will say different things.

But all that statements about "occupation of Finland" are as ridiculous as Soviet propaganda in 1939-40, saying that Finland was preparing an attack on Leningrad.

Your wartime government was stupid enough to kill thousands of it's citizens in a futile effort to stop inevitable. That speech by Cajander is a typical example of political hypocricy, chest-banging and obvious lies.

I think you missed my discussion with Staga about Finnish concentration camps in Karelia. I quoted Finnish sources translated to Russian. My biggest problem is that I can't even spell the names of Finnish researches in Latin :( And I hope that you will admit that Finns didn't stop at the old border. Again, what was the Finnish name for Petrozavodsk?

Soviet "partisans": why do you call them "partisans"? Did they operate on occupied territory? If not - were they regular army units? Many questions, no answers so far. The whole story looks strange for me, I want to know more about it.

Mrsid: "Elementary Military Education" started at the 9th grade and didn't suppose "following orders". Yes, basic formation marching, studying AKM and basic unit tactics was taught, but I don't think it's criminal.

Was the map you saw a map of Russian Empire in 1914? Was Helsinki called "Gelsingfors" there? Oh, sorry, it's in Cyrrilic :( Was there a border with Poland?

ALL school maps of USSR had a huge red line at the Soviet border. Any teacher who "couldn't explain what was the idea behind that map" had a good chance to lose his job.

What I don't like is that USSR is painted as an "evil empire" in the West. There is no one without a sin, but the things were not as bad as they are pictured now.

Another thought: Finnish government stated they don't understand "indirect agression". This term (kosvennaya agressiya) sounds incorrect in English, and I can't even imagine how it sounds in Finnish. In fact, it's exactly what happened in 1941 when Germans used Finland as a beachhead in the North.

Offline Dr Zhivago

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 576
Whats this?
« Reply #44 on: April 09, 2002, 10:49:00 AM »
Heres some information about soviet "partisans"...

Actions of Soviet partisans against the civilian population in Finland during the Continuation War

The purpose of this study was to find out how the actions of Soviet partisans were depicted in Finnish literature, and what was the discussion like in the press in the end of 1990’s. The study focused on actions of the partisans against villages inhabited by civilians within the borders of Finland, and not on partisan activity in the Finnish-occupied eastern Karelia, nor on the clashes between the partisans and Finnish soldiers.

Soon after the outbreak of war in the summer of 1941, the partisans began operating systematically. The operations were part of a total war against Germany and her ally, Finland. Their purpose was the pressure Finland out of the war, to break the morale of the civilian population, and to tie Finnish troops in action in the rear areas.

Usually those soldiers and civilians, who are called partisans, are members of a resistance movement in a country that is occupied. In the Continuation War, Finns used the definition „partisans" of those Russians who conducted operations against Finnish villages in the border areas of Lapland and Kainuu. The Russians also called them partisans. However, the Finns called those troops of their own who conducted operations in the enemy rear areas, long range patrolmen. Soviet partisans were not soldiers, nor were they under military command. Instead they were men and women who were trained and lead by the communist party, and who belonged to an organization subordinated to the communist party.

Between 1941-1944 Soviet partisans attacked 23 civilian villages between Liperi and Sodankylä. They killed 147 civilians and captured all the elderly people, women and children they encountered.

The actions of partisans were occasionally mentioned in literature already in the 1960’s, and in nonfiction literature starting from the 1970’s. But only in the 80’s and 90’s did these kinds of publications begin to grow in number, especially after the collapse of the Soviet Union in the latter half of the 1990’s. After the war people kept silent about the partisans in the name of a new foreign policy, and neither were the victims themselves willing to talk about their experiences.

One of the initiators of the public debate was Veikko Erkkilä’s book „Vaiettu Sota" (1998), and a documentary that based on it in the autumn of 1998. Fierce debate took place in some newspapers and magazines about the activities of the partisans. Reparations were demanded for the victims of the partisans, and people were relieved that the official silence was over. Other people felt that wars always involve civilian casualties, and no belligerent had a clean record in treatment of civilians. It was also reminded that the winner is always right, only the loser is guilty of war crimes.

After some time has passed, it is possible to gain objective information on Soviet partisans. The Ministry of Education has granted a grant for the Finnish Historical Society for a study on the actions of the Soviet partisans in Finland 1941-1944. Russian scholars take also part in the research, and it is part of a wider study of the political history of the Continuation War.

And small excerpt from finnish newspaper...
HELSINGIN SANOMAT - International Edition
« Last Edit: April 09, 2002, 10:51:15 AM by Dr Zhivago »