Author Topic: They Got Spit14 we want K-4  (Read 643 times)

Offline Wutz

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 107
They Got Spit14 we want K-4
« on: April 29, 2002, 05:38:14 PM »
They got Spit 14 now the 109 pilots wants the K series of the 109. And for the love of christ bring the P40 too AH I am sick of the 3 Daily P40 recuests LOL (and think of the many P40 variants u could boost of lol :)  But please dont make em Ben Affleck P40 Flight Model (outruns, outclimbs, outturns, out there, out standing the Zero)

Offline superpug1

  • Probation
  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 929
They Got Spit14 we want K-4
« Reply #1 on: April 29, 2002, 05:58:12 PM »
agree i do yes the force is strong with you yeeeesss. Just warming up for the episode 2 :D

Offline funkedup

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9466
      • http://www.raf303.org/
They Got Spit14 we want K-4
« Reply #2 on: April 29, 2002, 06:14:16 PM »
They got Me 262 and Ta152 we want Meteor III and Spitfire 21

Offline BGBMAW

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2288
ya ya i want me163
« Reply #3 on: April 29, 2002, 06:29:13 PM »
lol im still no tsure why people want p-40 so bad..yaya Historic thing ..but why else??? power guns?? i dont hink so......

and isnt 109g-10 close enuff to 109k???
I fly the g10 alot...love it...i also flew the 109k4 in AW..loved it........so ...well i dont know..im out...lolol


BGBMAW

Offline Tac

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4085
They Got Spit14 we want K-4
« Reply #4 on: April 29, 2002, 06:32:05 PM »
They got earlier versions of every plane modelled in AH EXCEPT the P-38. We want P-38F, H, J!!!! :D :D

Offline eddiek

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1442
They Got Spit14 we want K-4
« Reply #5 on: April 29, 2002, 07:59:10 PM »
No need for the 109K4, at least not in my opinion.
Era-wise, the Spit14 and 109G10 are real close on their introduction dates.
Are you telling us after all these years that those so called "manly", "uber" LW planes weren't equal to their counterparts?  ;)   After all, only the "rare" LW birds are perked, while the Spit14 carries a price tag.  Perk the G10, or unperk the Spit 14.

Offline Urchin

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5517
They Got Spit14 we want K-4
« Reply #6 on: April 29, 2002, 08:35:59 PM »
I'm a 109 pilot... I don't want the K-4.  The 109G-10 we have is a K-4 in all but name.  Hell, the 109G-10 in real life was a K-4 in all but name (at least it was supposed to be).  

I'd rather have a slightly better Spit than the IX.. like a Spit IX LF.  I'd also like a P-40 (early war one, like an E), a P-39 (and P-400 if possible), a early war P-38 (like an F), a Ki-43, Ki-84, and a Ki-44.

I'd also like a Brewster Buffalo.  In finnish markings.  The P-39 should be in Russian markings.  P-400 could be either British or U.S.  P-40 would be cool in Australian or New Zealand markings (both countries used a lot of P-40s).  

And I want a Stuka.  I want the early dive-bombing stuka, and the late G model with the two cannons under the wings.  

And I want a He-219 when everything else has been modelled :).

And a P-63.  And maybe a P-61.  And more Russian planes (but the sucky early war ones, we have enough late war good ones), like the I-16 and Mig-3.  And some more Russian twins and bombers.  

And then I want some Italian planes too.  Re-2000,2002, and 2005 would be good to have :).  Especially the 2000 and 2002.

Offline eddiek

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1442
Urchin, you crack me up.........
« Reply #7 on: April 29, 2002, 09:59:12 PM »
Here I was, checking the boards, saw your name as the last one to post to this thread......went and put on my Nomex suit and clicked to see what you wrote.......
Heck, there ain't many planes I don't want.  Experimental jobs or ones that were still on the drawing board are out in my book.
That would be the Ta-183, Ho-229, Do-335, etc......
I would love to see that He219 in AH, as well as the Me410.
I really really really really want to see a P-47M, or an N model.
I want to see the Ki43, the Ki84, a couple early model P-38's, a P-39 in Russian markings (and in Russian combat trim, helluva lot lighter), a P-35 for really early war setups, and yes, even the Brewster all the Finish fans have been screaming to get for the last two years.

Offline Urchin

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5517
They Got Spit14 we want K-4
« Reply #8 on: April 29, 2002, 10:26:07 PM »
Oh yea.. I'm glad you reminded me.  

P-47B (whatever model, cause they flew in South Pacific)
P-47N (cause they WERE fairly prominent against Japan in the closing months of the war)
P-47M would be awesome to have too.  It'd probaly be perked though, cause it'd be better than my LW rides :p

Offline Kweassa

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6425
They Got Spit14 we want K-4
« Reply #9 on: April 29, 2002, 11:47:28 PM »
I am also a 109 pilot.

I don't want a 'new' 109K-4.
I wish HTC add up some rearrangements in minor graphics, adjust a bit of flight modelling, fix the speed properly(even Vermillion admits the 109G-10 slower than the charts :p ) and rename it "K-4" and slap up some perk points for it.

 What I really want is a G-14, a gap closer between the earliest possible 109G-6/R-6 and the current G-10. And maybe spiff up the Spit9 a bit so the RAF fans won't whine about the 'unfairness'.

Offline Sancho

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1043
      • http://www.56thfightergroup.com
They Got Spit14 we want K-4
« Reply #10 on: April 30, 2002, 02:40:01 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Urchin
Oh yea.. I'm glad you reminded me.  

P-47B (whatever model, cause they flew in South Pacific)


Not to thread hijack or anything, but that is incorrect.  P-47Bs were relegated to stateside training duty.  None saw combat.  No P-47Cs either in the PTO, AFAIK.  Earliest P-47 to fly in PTO was the P-47D-2-RE flown by the 348th FG in August 1943, which the non-paddleblade P-47D-11 is nearly identical in performance.

Offline Wutz

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 107
109K
« Reply #11 on: April 30, 2002, 03:40:50 AM »
Well Erik Hartmann, Gunter Rall, Walter Krupinski and Adolf Galland all use the same frase when describing the K-4.

"The K series was as big a leap over the G series, as the F was over the E series"

I dont know how they make the AC in AH I am a player not a designer. But when they allready have the 109 (in many variants) would it not be easier too make the G-14 and K-4 Vs I-16 and Ju87 (I-16,Ju87 just an exampel would love those planes in AH) or is it the same job??????

Bf-109K4, a
high speed high altitude interceptor version, began arriving
in October 1944. Caldwell Donald, Jg26, ISBN 1-898697.

Offline DarkglamJG52

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 339
      • http://www.yonkis.com
They Got Spit14 we want K-4
« Reply #12 on: April 30, 2002, 04:53:01 AM »
The 109G-10 we have is a K-4 in all but name. Hell, the 109G-10 in real life was a K-4 in all but name (at least it was supposed to be).

Barbarity of the month.

I'd rather have a slightly better Spit than the IX.. like a Spit IX LF  

...and what about a real Spit  IX without UFO E , UFO G's, UFO  acceleration, laser beams and nose always up.


I agree with you about more russian (bombers), italian and japan. Also Stuka, He 219 and Me 410.

Offline MANDOBLE

  • Parolee
  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1849
      • http://www.terra.es/personal2/matias.s
They Got Spit14 we want K-4
« Reply #13 on: April 30, 2002, 06:33:45 AM »
Yeah, 109K-(4?) and 190A9 (Yep, A NINE).

Offline Sachs

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 570
      • http://where?
They Got Spit14 we want K-4
« Reply #14 on: April 30, 2002, 06:42:41 AM »
Not sure on this one.  Bring something else first.  I already have 15 versions o f 109's to fly.  ME-410 should be added though.