Author Topic: Request for a LW heavy bomber.....  (Read 1032 times)

Offline Dr Zhivago

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 576
Request for a LW heavy bomber.....
« Reply #15 on: May 11, 2002, 03:42:56 AM »
LW needs big buffs and greif would be answer for this. He177 got heavy armament, big bombload and would be suitable for the MA. Do217 obsolete and useless as bomber but good night-fighter. Ju188 much better bomber than A4 and more suitable for MA...

He177 max bombload was 7200kg (15840lb)... :p

Offline Wilbus

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4472
Request for a LW heavy bomber.....
« Reply #16 on: May 11, 2002, 05:39:26 AM »
HE177 best MA choice without doubt. Ju188 was pretty fast but couldn't take more load then the JU88, and with extrenal load, the little speed it has quickly falls away.

There are quite many other buffs we can have instead of these, will post some later.
Rasmus "Wilbus" Mattsson

Liberating Livestock since 1998, recently returned from a 5 year Sheep-care training camp.

Offline Dr Zhivago

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 576
Request for a LW heavy bomber.....
« Reply #17 on: May 11, 2002, 06:28:36 AM »
Some info from A2 version...
325 mph (523 kmh) at 20,500 ft (6250m)
bombload 3000 kg (6600 lb)
« Last Edit: May 11, 2002, 10:33:01 AM by Dr Zhivago »

Offline Replicant

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3567
Request for a LW heavy bomber.....
« Reply #18 on: May 11, 2002, 06:37:30 AM »
Yeah, both the Do217 and He177 would be very nice additions.  How about the Ju289 (or is it the Ju290, I get confused!!)??

Has anyone got date for the Ju289, I seem to have misplaced my Luftwaffe reference book!

Regards
NEXX

Offline Dr Zhivago

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 576
Request for a LW heavy bomber.....
« Reply #19 on: May 11, 2002, 07:03:46 AM »
Junkers Ju 290A-5
Nine-seat long range transport and reconnaissance bomber

Four 1700hp BMW 801D radial engines
Wing span 42.00m, length 28.64m, height 6.83m, wing area 203.6m2
Maximal take-off weight 44970kg
Max. speed 440 kmh (273 mph) at 5800m
cruising speed 360 kmh (224 mph)
Service ceiling 6000m
Range 6150km

Armament
Two dorsal turrets, each with a 15mm MG151, one MG151 in the tail, two in beam windows, and one in the front of the under nose gondola. One 13mm MG131 in the aft section of the gondola
FuG 200 Hohentwiel search radar, range 100km
Bombload 1800 kg (3960 lb)

Offline Staga

  • Parolee
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5334
      • http://www.nohomersclub.com/
Request for a LW heavy bomber.....
« Reply #20 on: May 11, 2002, 07:47:54 AM »
With He-177 we could have 50mm or 75mm cannon and guided Henschel antiship missiles :)

Offline Tumor

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4297
      • Wait For It
Request for a LW heavy bomber.....
« Reply #21 on: May 11, 2002, 08:05:16 AM »
Zhivago that thing looks kinda like a Nimrod in a wierd sorta way.
Cool pic.

Tumor
"Dogfighting is useless"  :Erich Hartmann

Offline Wilbus

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4472
Request for a LW heavy bomber.....
« Reply #22 on: May 11, 2002, 09:53:15 AM »
Dr Zhivago, 325Mph is not 440km/h, it's about 520 (523) km/h.

If we're gonna get another JuX88 we might aswell get the Ju88 S, high speed bomber, top speed 615km/h which is 382Mph.
Rasmus "Wilbus" Mattsson

Liberating Livestock since 1998, recently returned from a 5 year Sheep-care training camp.

Offline Esme

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 318
Request for a LW heavy bomber.....
« Reply #23 on: May 11, 2002, 11:45:14 AM »
Do217 useless? Don't make me laugh! :-)

Some data:

Ju88A4: served Sept 1939-1945, 14,980 of all types, including over 7,000 Ju88A's.  Max bomb load 2,000kg both internally and externally. (the A5 could carry more, but how much more I am unsure). Max speed 292mph. Ceiling 8.2km

He111: served 1939-1945, over 7300 of all types produced, including about 6200 He111H's.  Maximum bomb load 3,250kg (includes external bombs). Max speed (He111H) 250mph Ceiling 6.7km

Do217: served late 1940-1945, 1730 of all types, of which 1366 were bombers. Maximum bombload 4,000kgs Some types carried 2 FX1400 of Hs293 guided bombs externally instead. maximum speeds 320-340mph  Ceiling about 7.5km for bomber variants

Ju188: served 1943-1945, 1100 of all types. Max bombload 3,000kg, max speed 325mph Ceiling 9.3km

He177: served March 1942-1945, 908 built (8 prototypes, 35 He177A0, 130 He177A1, 170 He177A3, 565 He177A5). Between February and December 1943 Heinkel and Arado delivered 261 He177A-5's. Performance was improved, with ceiling raised from 7km to 8km.  Max. offensive load was 6,000kgs, including externally carried Hs293 or 294 guided bombs or two FX1400 bombs. I am not sure, but I think the internal bomb bay could carry just 2,000kgs of bombs, and was often blanked off, with ordnance being carried externally only. Max speed (A5 version)303mph

On 13 February 1944 Goering was at Rheine to watch planes of KG100 set off to attack England. 14 taxied out, 13 took off, 8 returned soon with overheated or burning engines, four reached London, but only three came back.

OK: lets suppose that the He177 is modelled. It then has just a 2,000kg bomb load unless or until radio-guided bombs are introduced into AH, and I can't see THAT happening any time soon.  That makes the He177 a poor choice for a heavier bomber, and the Do217 the best candidate so far as sheer weight of bombs delivered goes.

If radio-controlled bombs ARE modelled, the Do217 still has the edge, because more of them were produced, and in a wider range of variants, making the Do217 a more useful addition to the game.

If engine overheating etc is ever introduced, the He177 probably will be treated like a leper in the MA.  It'd probably ONLY get used in scenario games, then!

With regard to defensive firepower, yes, the He177 is on a par with a B17... which means it cant make unescorted daylight raids and hope to survive very long very often.  Same as any other bomber.

For speed the Do217 wins, for ceiling the Ju188 wins, and I suspect the Ju188 was the more agile.  In terms of quantity built, the He111 wins.

Note the Ju88A4 bombload, btw; note that at the moment AH allows combinations of loadout that in real life would seldom, if ever, have been used (planes were sometimes flown in overload condition, but not as a common thing) (AH isnt alone in this).

So... what are our criteria for wanting to include a plane in Aces High? What are Hitechs?  A good representational cross-section of planes that were used in WW2? Planes that will aid gameplay or balance? Planes that will add variety and colour? Planes that will be as useful as possible to all sections of the community? Dream planes that someone thought up 3 days before VEday and drew on the back of a beermat?

If the latter, then it's not a WW2 combat flight sim you're interested in. (Which is OK, but its good to know what it is different folk want when they ask for planes)  If you're not after representational types, then you're not interested in a good simulation of WW2 aerial combat (I'll leave weather and nightfighting out of the argument this time! :-})  Fighting with WW2 planes you may well like, but it ain't WW2 combat as we know it Jim!

With an eye to the all-round usefulness of the planes AND the current limitations of the game, then, it seems to me that any of He111H, Ju188 or Do217 would be a better choice than the He177 for the next LW bomber to be introduced. I'm not saying I wouldn't like to see the He177 in AH at all, mind - I'd love to take my chances on those midnight raids over london in one, if my engines held up long enough! - just not NEXT.  And before ANY LW bombers, what about an Italian one (SM79?) followed by a Russian one (Pe2!).  Those two planes would both add far more to the game than the He177. IMO, of course... :-}

Esme

Offline Dr Zhivago

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 576
Request for a LW heavy bomber.....
« Reply #24 on: May 11, 2002, 11:52:03 AM »
Thx Wilbus, looks like my source got wrong speed ;)
That Ju88 S is quite intresting plane, faster than Mossy what we got at AH and about 90 mph :eek: faster than A4 (A4 292 mph, Moss 375 mph). But how big was that bombload at S version, not much i think. Defensive armament must be puny to achieve that speed...

Offline Dr Zhivago

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 576
Request for a LW heavy bomber.....
« Reply #25 on: May 11, 2002, 01:02:10 PM »
Esme
Its good to remember that AH isnt super realistic game. Arado and me262 engines are more closer hairdryers than jet engines. In real life those jumos needed very smooth throttle control. If you moved the throttles too fast, they would flame out and lost thrust. And engine life was only between 10-25 hours and  they werent very reliable either.

Whats next LW bomber addition  to game ?
Allies got b17, lanca ,b26 , a20 and tmb3. Axis got Ju88, Ar234 and Ki67 but lacks heavy bombers. He177 was only german heavy buff during ww2 and its only drawback was those engines. Ju188, He111 H and Do217 were just medium bombers and thus carried lighter defensive armament and bombload. Do217 was largest german medium bomber and was much closer heavy buff. Would be good if axis got at least one heavy buff to game...

He177 carried 1000 or 2000kg ? of bombs internally and there were racks under wings wich could carry bombs or two missiles. Hs 293 weights about 1,045kg, Kramer X-1 about 1,570kg and plane could carry three missiles if the bombay was blanked off and racks added to it. So normal bombload should be bigger than 2000kg.
« Last Edit: May 11, 2002, 01:45:36 PM by Dr Zhivago »

Offline Karnak

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23048
Request for a LW heavy bomber.....
« Reply #26 on: May 11, 2002, 09:08:57 PM »
My vote would still go to the Ju188A-1.

Its faster than a B-17, Lanc, B-26 or Ju88 and carries a larger payload than the B-17, B-26 or Ju88, has defensive firepower at least equal to the B-26 (better in my opinion) and is probably tough like the Ju88A-4 is.

He177A-5 would probably be detrimental to the MA.  It would be adding an aircraft with the payload of a Lanc, the defensive firepower of a B-17 and the speed of a B-26, all in one package.

Can you guess how many B-17s, B-26s or Lancs would be seen after that?
Petals floating by,
      Drift through my woman's hand,
             As she remembers me-

Offline GRUNHERZ

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 13413
Request for a LW heavy bomber.....
« Reply #27 on: May 11, 2002, 10:06:22 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Karnak


He177A-5 would probably be detrimental to the MA.  It would be adding an aircraft with the payload of a Lanc, the defensive firepower of a B-17 and the speed of a B-26, all in one package.

Can you guess how many B-17s, B-26s or Lancs would be seen after that?



So you're saying He177 is the best WW2 bomber aside from B29? :)

Good! Bring He177 to AH!

Offline BUG_EAF322

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3153
      • http://bug322.startje.com
Request for a LW heavy bomber.....
« Reply #28 on: May 11, 2002, 11:48:10 PM »
Do-17 IMHO!!

PUNT

Offline Karnak

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23048
Request for a LW heavy bomber.....
« Reply #29 on: May 12, 2002, 01:23:41 AM »
GRUNHERZ,

Yes, I'm saying that the He177A-5 is, in the context of the MA, the best WWII bomber other than the B-29.

Just the way that the Spitfire is the best fighter in the context of the MA.

Put either in the real situation and major flaws appear.

In reality I have absolutely no doubts that the B-17, B-24, Lancaster and Halifax were much better bombers than the He177A-5.
Petals floating by,
      Drift through my woman's hand,
             As she remembers me-