Author Topic: i don't know  (Read 893 times)

Offline weazel

  • Parolee
  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1471
Believe it or not...
« Reply #30 on: June 07, 2002, 03:44:03 PM »
I don't care which parties candidate holds the presidency, in situations like this whichever candidate it may be deserves to...and must be held accountable for their incompetence in regards to allowing an atrocity like 9/11 to occur.

Anything else is roadkill, and I'll bet we can all agree on that.

The majority of the posts in this thread just go to prove my point that there is no unity as there is way too much playing democrats vs republicans going on.

now can we go back to posting funny pictures :)

Sorry bud, I can't find any humor in this topic.

Offline Eagler

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 18804
Sorry bud, I can't find any humor in this topic. <S>
« Reply #31 on: June 07, 2002, 04:26:03 PM »
me neither, but it ain't worth raising my blood pressure over as in the end we are a bunch of hens clucking and pecking at the ground at it is all for naught ...

Easier to throw in a :) and a and keep it civil than to give up salt


:) :)
"Masters of the Air" Scenario - JG27


Intel Core i7-13700KF | GIGABYTE Z790 AORUS Elite AX | 64GB G.Skill DDR5 | 16GB GIGABYTE RTX 4070 Ti Super | 850 watt ps | pimax Crystal Light | Warthog stick | TM1600 throttle | VKB Mk.V Rudder

Offline midnight Target

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15114
i don't know
« Reply #32 on: June 07, 2002, 04:54:42 PM »
Clinton would be guilty ...except he was invented by Kurt Tank.


:p

Offline Thrawn

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6972
i don't know
« Reply #33 on: June 07, 2002, 09:03:21 PM »
Can anyone actually argue weazels points?

Offline weazel

  • Parolee
  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1471
Circle the wagons Dick!
« Reply #34 on: June 07, 2002, 11:04:58 PM »
Legal group wonders why White House took Cipro before attacks


© 2002 WorldNetDaily.com

Legal watchdog group Judicial Watch has filed lawsuits against several Bush administration agencies for failure to produce documents concerning the terrorist anthrax attacks of last October, the organization announced today.

The agencies named include: the FBI, the Department of Health and Human Services, the Centers for Disease Control, the U.S. Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases and the U.S. Postal Service. The documents were requested under the provisions of the Freedom of Information Act, or FOIA.

Additional suits involving other anthrax-related FOIA requests with other agencies are likely to be filed in the next two weeks, says Washington, D.C.-based Judicial Watch.

The organization represents hundreds of postal workers from the Brentwood Postal Facility in Washington. Until the facility was finally condemned, postal workers there handled all of the mail for the city, including the mail that contained the anthrax-laden envelopes addressed to Sens. Daschle and Leahy. While Capitol Hill workers received prompt medical care, says Judicial Watch, Brentwood postal workers were ordered by USPS officials to continue working in the contaminated facility. Two Brentwood workers died from inhalation anthrax, and dozens more are suffering from a variety of ailments related to the anthrax attacks.

In October, press reports revealed that White House staff had been on a regimen of the powerful antibiotic Cipro since the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks. Judicial Watch wants to know why White House workers, including President Bush, began taking the drug nearly a month before anthrax was detected on Capitol Hill.

"The American people deserve a full accounting from the Bush administration, the FBI and other agencies concerning the anthrax attacks," Judicial Watch Chairman and General Counsel Larry Klayman said in a statement. "The FBI's investigation seems to have dead-ended, and frankly, that is not very reassuring given their performance with the Sept. 11 hijackers. One doesn't simply start taking a powerful antibiotic for no good reason. The American people are entitled to know what the White House staffers knew nine months ago."

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Why should Americans have to sue the government for information, doesn't this strike anyone else as absurd?

Oh........let me guess, if asked the Bush administration will respond "providing those documents could jeopardize national security".  :rolleyes:

It just keeps getting deeper doesn't it? :(

Weazel, your country needs you and your keen analytical mind.

-Sikboy


Sarcasm obviously, I'm not smart enough to hold a posistion with the NSA.

Weazel, rock on. Keep voiceing your opinion. Personally, I think you're full of toejam but I'll defend your right to say it.
__________________
Apache


OK, do you mind pointing out exactly where I'm full of toejam?   :D

Can anyone actually argue weazels points?

Odd isn't it thrawn?
« Last Edit: June 08, 2002, 02:16:47 AM by weazel »

Offline StSanta

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2496
i don't know
« Reply #35 on: June 08, 2002, 05:33:58 AM »
y00 @rr a d00mb f@kk wez, | 0wN@g33 y00!

y00 suxx0r$.

There, I have now argued against weazel's points as well as any good loyal republican/libertarian/national socialist/democrat can.

Ownage.

Offline Sandman

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 17620
Re: Circle the wagons Dick!
« Reply #36 on: June 08, 2002, 10:15:13 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by weazel
Sarcasm obviously, I'm not smart enough to hold a posistion with the NSA.


You obviously have not met some of the people that work for the NSA. :D

Keep the posts comin' Weaz.
sand

Offline Maverick

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 13958
i don't know
« Reply #37 on: June 08, 2002, 07:13:07 PM »
weazel,

You want to quote my post, fine. Do not add to it to make it look like I said something I didn't.

Like Apache said, you're full of fecal matter. All you have are baseless accusations fueled by a pathological hatred and a conspiracy paranoia.


BTW some of the "Government employees" were taking anthrax injocculations as far back as 3 years or more. I guess that was a Bush conspiracy too.  :rolleyes:  The military ordered it's troops to take it even though they were not due to be rotated overseas.
DEFINITION OF A VETERAN
A Veteran - whether active duty, retired, national guard or reserve - is someone who, at one point in their life, wrote a check made payable to "The United States of America", for an amount of "up to and including my life."
Author Unknown

Offline weazel

  • Parolee
  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1471
I hope your joking Sandman...
« Reply #38 on: June 08, 2002, 08:08:20 PM »
If not we really are in deep toejam.  :D

Quote
Originally posted by Maverick
weazel,

You want to quote my post, fine. Do not add to it to make it look like I said something I didn't.

Like Apache said, you're full of fecal matter. All you have are baseless accusations fueled by a pathological hatred and a conspiracy paranoia.


BTW some of the "Government employees" were taking anthrax injocculations as far back as 3 years or more. I guess that was a Bush conspiracy too.  :rolleyes:  The military ordered it's troops to take it even though they were not due to be rotated overseas.


When I quoted you it was to the republican mantra you keep expounding on:

"The majority of the posts in this thread just go to prove my point that there is no unity as there is way too much playing democrats vs republicans going on."

My response was:

"I don't care which parties candidate holds the presidency, in situations like this whichever candidate it may be deserves to...and must be held accountable for their incompetence in regards to allowing an atrocity like 9/11 to occur.

Anything else is roadkill, and I'll bet we can all agree on that."


Buh Bye to your strawman, he's now ashes.

I suppose I should have put it before my response and didn't intend to make it appear you were saying something else, now about the republican mantra I referred to:

" Until we start acting lke a unified country instead of playing democrats vs republicans we cannot hope to convince the enemy that we are serious in our homeland."

Your statement is just laughable.

You have bought into the "circle the wagons" crap that Bush and his thugs are using to TRY and cow the American people.... that we are *powerless to stop terrorist attacks* in our country and that questioning his administration is equivelant to supporting terror.

So many Americans seem to be willing to allow themselves to be controlled by FEAR,  Bush and Co know it...and are using it to the best of their ability, shame on you for perpetuating their ruse.

I call roadkill!

Let me say it again...roadkill.

One of our systems biggest assets is the right.....and the duty of all Americans to exercise, without this it could easily result in a government more akin to a dictatorship than a democracy.

Point out the "fecal matter" in my responses, just because you say it's so doesn't nullify the truth in my statements.

Finally:

Oh...and taking anthrax inocculations while in the military, it's a matter of common sense to have troops *prepared* to deploy without rushing them through a vaccine program prior to it.


WHOOSH! There went your other strawman.

You really must try harder next time.  :rolleyes:

How am I doing so far Santa?  :D
« Last Edit: June 08, 2002, 08:13:19 PM by weazel »

Offline Eagler

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 18804
i don't know
« Reply #39 on: June 08, 2002, 09:00:34 PM »
weaz

at what age did you become so paraniod?

:)
"Masters of the Air" Scenario - JG27


Intel Core i7-13700KF | GIGABYTE Z790 AORUS Elite AX | 64GB G.Skill DDR5 | 16GB GIGABYTE RTX 4070 Ti Super | 850 watt ps | pimax Crystal Light | Warthog stick | TM1600 throttle | VKB Mk.V Rudder

Offline Maverick

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 13958
i don't know
« Reply #40 on: June 08, 2002, 11:06:28 PM »
weazel,

Get this straight. This so called republican mantra you refer to is in your mind. Do not infer what I have not implied.

You really should seek professional help. You are not worth any further expenditure of my time.
DEFINITION OF A VETERAN
A Veteran - whether active duty, retired, national guard or reserve - is someone who, at one point in their life, wrote a check made payable to "The United States of America", for an amount of "up to and including my life."
Author Unknown

Offline weazel

  • Parolee
  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1471
Lol, your unable to refute anything I've pointed out....
« Reply #41 on: June 08, 2002, 11:30:33 PM »
Attacking me is the last refuge of a weak mind.

Shall I post links to quotes from the Bush administration as proof or do you concede the argument?

My analysis of your remarks isn't out of context...and are accurate, apparently to close for your comfort it appears.

Eagler...where theres smoke theres usually a fire.  :)


Quote
Originally posted by Maverick
weazel,

Get this straight. This so called republican mantra you refer to is in your mind. Do not infer what I have not implied.

You really should seek professional help. You are not worth any further expenditure of my time.

Offline Tumor

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4296
      • Wait For It
Re: Proof.... you DO keep up with current events don't you?
« Reply #42 on: June 08, 2002, 11:51:46 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by weazel
"Recent revelations have surfaced that the Bush administration had been specifically warned of 9/11-style attacks by a host of foreign intelligence services, and failed to properly address them. In order to get out from under any censure for failing to deal with



  I live work and breath IN the Intel community... trust me, all this B.S. about specific warnings is just that.   If there was any warning at all (which I don't really doubt due to the nature of the system) it most likely got tied up in bureaucracy long before it ever got to the White House (due to the nature of the system).  Further, it was probably VERY vague until some finger pointer got ahold of it AFTER the fact.
"Dogfighting is useless"  :Erich Hartmann

Offline Tumor

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4296
      • Wait For It
i don't know
« Reply #43 on: June 08, 2002, 11:58:24 PM »
"Nonetheless the revelation by the White House, made in response to a report about the intelligence warning this evening on CBS News, is bound to fuel Congressional demands for a deeper investigation into why American intelligence agencies and the Federal Bureau of Investigation had failed to put together individual pieces of evidence that, in retrospect, now seem to suggest what was coming."


 Congress is who needs to be investigated, and they know it.  It's thier ridiculous laws that lead to any Intel failings.. thiers alone.
"Dogfighting is useless"  :Erich Hartmann

Offline weazel

  • Parolee
  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1471
Ja, I'm very paranoid.... <clicks heels>
« Reply #44 on: June 09, 2002, 05:40:07 PM »
« Last Edit: June 09, 2002, 05:54:30 PM by weazel »