Quote:
"...AW has had this type of setup now for over a year - for thier relaxed realism crowd."
Irrelevant.
Quote:
"from what I've read at AGW and what I saw occur in AW I see the WB's setup is suffering he same fate as AW's"
Way too early to tell.
Quote:
"The early plane set favours the LW and the late plane set favours the Allies."
As it did in "Real Life". Axis aircraft flown by competent Squads can deal defeat to the Late War Allies. Perhaps not as easily as the Allies can with their rugged Heavy Bombers, but it can be done. Nothing like a challenge.
Quote:
"Not to mention the early plane set is lacking."
LOL!!! I guess the He-111 is missing, but it would be a sitting duck in any case. The JU-88 is a far superior Light Bomber to the He-111.
I once led a "Weekend Warrior" IJN/IJA Force and by the time the Event ended we, the IJN/IJA, captured exactly one less field than the Allies managed with their Heavy Bombers. The IJN/IJA would have won overall if one Kate has not missed his target in the waning seconds of the Event.
It just takes a little dedication, patience, and skill, to buck the "odds".
Easymo:
In all the years i've been playing WB's, i have used H2H exactly once. I am not in the least bit interested in H2H. WB's or AH's. The "choice" i am referring to is the type of "Gameplay" available. Early War/Late War, Historical Matchups, and Historical "Re-enactments", if you will.
Cabby
------------------
=44th FS "VAMPIRES"=
"The Jungle Air Force"
Welcome To The Jungle!!!"
[This message has been edited by cabby (edited 07-14-2000).]