Hi Duedel,
>AFAIK the 205 is a worse turner than the 202, right or wrong? But why? Only cause the 205 is heavier (2581kg vs. 2350kg)?
Using these weights and 1475 resp. 1175 hp, I'd estimate that due to the higher weight, the MC205 would only have 95% of the MC202's sustained turn rate.
However, this turn only needs 15% more power while the MC205 has a plus of 26%, so it can actually be expected to turn faster than these 95% anyway :-)
The turn radius of the MC202 is still shorter, and it's superior in instantaneous turns as well. The sustained turn rate of the MC205 probably is quite close though.
(Nothing scientific, just a rough rule of thumb.)
Regards,
Henning (HoHun)