Author Topic: If you want your aircraft fixed in Aces High... (Read 1691 times)

Vermillion · « **Reply #15 on:** September 04, 2002, 07:22:12 AM »

190's did not carry Mk103's in operational aircraft and the trigger groupings were not selectable, they were hard wired.

RAS · « **Reply #16 on:** September 04, 2002, 08:08:45 AM »

Aircraft - Spit 5

Issue - No D/T's available

Impact - Range

RASCAL

Wilbus · « **Reply #17 on:** September 04, 2002, 11:40:26 AM »

Didn't see he typed that one Verm. Trigger group was not as we have it though. They were selectable, got some pilot reports of it.

J_A_B · « **Reply #18 on:** September 04, 2002, 12:51:38 PM »

They were selectable in the sense you could physically re-wire the airplane. You could so this for any WW2 airplane if you really wanted to though so the FW-190 isn't unique in that regard.

The 190's trigger group IS wrong right now in AH though; primary should be the cowling MG's plus inner cannon, secondary should be outer cannon.

J_A_B

Glasses · « **Reply #19 on:** September 04, 2002, 01:09:22 PM »

Wow! that'd be good Jab indeed.

Mister Fork · « **Reply #20 on:** September 04, 2002, 02:18:50 PM »

Wow. Lots of good stuff.

I'd ask that those responding to this thread either add to the existing debate with supporting evidence, add to existing bugs, or rebutt problems with evidence.

Please, keep the peanut gallery comments to another topic.

AcId · « **Reply #21 on:** September 04, 2002, 02:45:30 PM »

Good Idea Fork . . . Good Luck,

F4F-4, FM-2

The Gauge which displays Rate of Climb/Decent, is inacurate.
The needle rotates at the wrong point, level flight shows correct but if you climb or dive you'll see what I mean.

Vermillion · « **Reply #22 on:** September 04, 2002, 02:59:59 PM »

No arguement that what we have in AH is wrong, one firing circuit controlled the cowl guns and the inner cannons, and the second controlled the outter cannons and any gondola's. AH's error actually benefits the A series pilot.

But it was not pilot selectable, beyond a physical modification to the aircraft. I have the firing circuit diagram if you want too see it.

Heinkel · « **Reply #23 on:** September 04, 2002, 03:05:36 PM »

I agree, while in air, you can't change it. but while on the groud, or before you up, you should be able to chnage it.

The way we have it now isn't good. I'd use the 2x20mm and 2x13mm for fighters only, and save the 30mm for buffs. As it as now, you cant use the 20mm without wasting the 30mm. As for the Fw190F/A-8 with Mk103's it was used in small #'s on the Russian front agaisnt armor

BTW pic is from the book Alfred Price - The Focke Wulf 190 in Combat

Thrawn · « **Reply #24 on:** September 04, 2002, 03:26:03 PM »

I recommend that anyone who is going to make claims post some actual proof. Such as documents and filmed tests that show how the game is not in line with them.

Any thing else is just an opinion.

Heinkel · « **Reply #25 on:** September 04, 2002, 03:28:39 PM »

Proof has been posted for everything I have mentioned 1000 times...if you want proof, go dig the treads up.

As for the other stuff...Ju88/234/202/205/Il-2 bomb loads, it's just common knowlegde that they had many more bomb options then we have in AH.

Thrawn · « **Reply #26 on:** September 04, 2002, 03:44:16 PM »

Hey, you are the guys that want the changes, not me.

HTC has told you what they want in order to consider a change. I suggest that if you really want the changes, you provide the info on silver platter.

Mathman · « **Reply #27 on:** September 04, 2002, 04:02:25 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Heinkel
Proof has been posted for everything I have mentioned 1000 times...if you want proof, go dig the treads up.

Ok Heinkel, did you read what the original; poster asked for? This is someone that asks for a list of what is perceived to be incorrect and the proof that it is correct. Why is he asking this? I don't think he is calling you a luftwhiner or a cheesedick or anyhting like that. He wants to make it easier for HTC to actually check the info and see if a correction needs to be made.

When you get defensive, people could care less if what you say has merit. I know I could give a crap. However, it seems to me that all that you were asked for was to include the proof to make collecting the packeage to be sent in easier.

After seeing your response complete with the hyperbole that seems to go hand in hand with the LW whines... errrr constructive criticisms, I hope that none of your requests get fixed. I get too much enjoyment from watching you chase your tail and get all pissy when someone mentions that you might be whining.;

Heinkel · « **Reply #28 on:** September 04, 2002, 04:39:34 PM »

Well when proof has been posted 1000 times, I really dont feel like posting it again. If you seach back through this BBS, you will find a thread or two for every topic about LW planes I brought up. I'm sure if there was a problem with your favortie ride, the F6F, you would bring it up. All I did was simply list what I saw wrong, and then people start asking for proof. I'm not posting the proof 1 more time, go and find it your self...it's all on this BBS

Plus, enough with the proof. After a few allied whines, the p38 got fixed. The typhoon got it's Drop tanks. I wonder why they havn't fixed somthing as obvious as the 190 Fuel order? or the Ta152 speeds? When Allied fans get every problem on their plane fixed ASAP, LW/Italian/IJN/IJA (Axis)fans would expect the same.

AcId · « **Reply #29 on:** September 04, 2002, 04:42:39 PM »

Here ya go Mr Fork