Author Topic: If you want your aircraft fixed in Aces High... (Read 1669 times)

Heinkel · « **Reply #45 on:** September 05, 2002, 06:13:03 AM »

As for the the Jets/Rockets

163: This will ONLY be next to the HQ. It's not like your gonna see 163's dogfighting. This is a GOOD thing also. Lets say Knights are pushed back to their HQ by bish. Some bish might go to knight, so they could fly the 163, balancing the numbers. This is a good 2-in-1 deal.

234: How often do you see these? never. Since 1.10 it's really hard to keep these in formation for some reason, and I really havn't seen one since 1.10. Didn't see them much before it either.

262: This is the only Jet you could say that you see. If I am lucky i might see 1 a week? It's not like the MA is all Jet vs. Jet comabt with everyone is super-duper LW jets.

Any other nonsense?

Glasses · « **Reply #46 on:** September 05, 2002, 10:11:13 AM »

BTW there is 1 thing I'm really skeptical about and that's the 6 Radiator damage in Dora, I haven't had my radiator been damaged since I dunno 4 weeks,most of the time I lose a wing or something else before I do lose my radiator in the Dora.

Acid those 2 planes are not the only ones the Bf110s has its VSI its ASI and its flap position indicator needle out of place.

Yes , Fix the Ta and AH's -ammo-

-ammo- · « **Reply #47 on:** September 05, 2002, 11:43:43 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by Wotan

You imply that the lw guys wanted a 262 or a 234 or a 163. That aint the case. Ht can model any plane he wants. Most of the guys who fly lw planes rarely even fly the 3 that are perked now.

I didn't imply that at all. I am implying that you and certain other guys are not appreciative or content with what you have. You have 5 FW's, 5 109's, 2 Jets, and one rocket plane (as brady corrected me) already and from what I have read of Heinkle's and Sach's posts, you think HTC is conspiring against the LW side of the game. Does that not sound as stupid to you as it does to me?? Surely you have more reason that that.

Quote

Originally posted by Wotan

Theres numerous post that start with 1 guy posting a chart. Then
you self-appointed whiner police fill the thread with toejam stirring non-sense.

It was a good thread until this "Plus, enough with the proof. After a few allied whines, the p38 got fixed. The typhoon got it's Drop tanks. I wonder why they havn't fixed somthing as obvious as the 190 Fuel order? or the Ta152 speeds? When Allied fans get every problem on their plane fixed ASAP, LW/Italian/IJN/IJA (Axis)fans would expect the same and this "We stand corrected except for the A5/234 all the others seem like allied rides to me. Looks around, nope no lights on. Conspiracy? For as long as I have been readin these boards and the countless data that has been shown it is pretty obvious what is going on.[/].

Quote

Originally posted by Wotan

If you are so sick of the whiners then you know their names add umm to your ignore list. No one makes you read these threads. I suspect you know the content even before you read them. You just come here to stir the pot some more.

Its the insulting that bugs me. Some folks glasses are half full, and others are always half M/T. Its the latter for certain LW fans. And, I am NOT lumping all LW fans in this bucket. There are some guys that are just having fun without all the whining. And, Please don't proceed to tell me what I can and cannot comment on.

Oh BTW, The P-47 models are too slow in AH according the Bodie's P-47 bible, by ten MPH even (AH=418 TAS @ 25K, Reference = 428 TAS @ 25K . Would that be enough to squeak about in your opinion? Just curious.

Wilbus · « **Reply #48 on:** September 05, 2002, 12:56:14 PM »

Sorry ammo but whatever thread there is about LW planes, where info is posted, proof and evidence of something, good or bad, you come in there and call it a whine. Don't matter what it says, if it's LW, it's a whine acording to you.
You do act like some kind of whine police and try/do hijack some threads, be it for fun or not but it's getting kind of anoying. Untill you have eveidence that should somehow say that the evidence we have (which you won't find btw) please don't come in and scream whiners in those kind of threads.

Wilbus · « **Reply #49 on:** September 05, 2002, 12:57:38 PM »

Ps. Do we actually have the Me163 yet?

Mathman · « **Reply #50 on:** September 05, 2002, 01:00:14 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Wotan
math everything heinkel stated has been backed up with "proof" in numerous threads.

Ok, where did anyone say that he didn't provide proof? All that was asked by Mister Fork was that it be included. Why? Well, if you guys could get past your paranoia, you might actually see that he is indeed trying to help you. But I guess there is no need to help you since it has been posted over 1000 times. My bad and his bad for asking that his task, that he volunteered for, be made a bit easier.

And before any of you junior Eric Hartmann's get all defensive about anything I have said, let me offer some proof of the things I have claimed:

Feelings of Persecution and Acute Paranoia:

Posted by Sachs:

Quote

We stand corrected except for the A5/234 all the others seem like allied rides to me. Looks around, nope no lights on. Conspiracy? For as long as I have been readin these boards and the countless data that has been shown it is pretty obvious what is going on.

Posted by Heinkel:

Quote

My post is BS?

When numerous post's about the 152's speed and 190A-5's speed have been posted since I have joined up (about July 2001), and such an obvious problem hasn't been fixed, you tell me what's BS. The 190A-5 has a big problem. I could see 1-3 MPH off, but 18? that could easily mean life or death. All 152 Speeds are off too. Again by about 20 MPH.

Stop trying to derail this thread. It won't work.

and another:

Quote

As for the the Jets/Rockets

163: This will ONLY be next to the HQ. It's not like your gonna see 163's dogfighting. This is a GOOD thing also. Lets say Knights are pushed back to their HQ by bish. Some bish might go to knight, so they could fly the 163, balancing the numbers. This is a good 2-in-1 deal.

234: How often do you see these? never. Since 1.10 it's really hard to keep these in formation for some reason, and I really havn't seen one since 1.10. Didn't see them much before it either.

262: This is the only Jet you could say that you see. If I am lucky i might see 1 a week? It's not like the MA is all Jet vs. Jet comabt with everyone is super-duper LW jets.

Any other nonsense?

I would also like to give Brady an . This was probably the first post that he has made (well, except for the "Name this" threads) that I actually agreed with what he said or that didn't just get on my nerves (and no offense meant Brady, just making an observation on the fact that I disagree with what you say almost all the time)

-ammo- · « **Reply #51 on:** September 05, 2002, 01:00:35 PM »

wilbus--

I dont care if you call me the "whine police". Whatever floats your tugboat. I have nothing to prove to you. If it pisses you off when I call it like see it. then that is your problem. I am sure you will get over it. You are young, and full of life.

Fatty · « **Reply #52 on:** September 05, 2002, 01:17:34 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Heinkel
Well when proof has been posted 1000 times, I really dont feel like posting it again. If you seach back through this BBS, you will find a thread or two for every topic about LW planes I brought up.

I could only find it posted 147 times. Perhaps someone involved in the conspiracy is someone going back and deleting the other 853?

Heinkel · « **Reply #53 on:** September 05, 2002, 01:19:22 PM »

Quote

Oh BTW, The P-47 models are too slow in AH according the Bodie's P-47 bible, by ten MPH even (AH=418 TAS @ 25K, Reference = 428 TAS @ 25K . Would that be enough to squeak about in your opinion? Just curious.

Bingo. If it's wrong then post it here, and just let HTC know about it, that's what this thread is for. Not for LW vs Allied flame-fest. If you think the speeds for the 152/190A-5 are wrong or you think the fuel order is ok the way it is, thats Ok!!! Just post something to back it up. Do I think HTC is biased? no. If you look at my orginal post I also asked for more bomb loads on the Il-2, C202/C205. I am just curisous as to why a bug as obvious as the 190A-5 speed or 152 speeds has been around for so long...

Tyro48 · « **Reply #54 on:** September 05, 2002, 01:24:33 PM »

Model the g-suit in the P-51D

Remove the 85 gallon fuselage tank from the P-51B-5-NA 43-6913

Model pilot gut, glasses, physical strength, hay fever, colds, headaches, morning after hangover etc etc etc

Glasses · « **Reply #55 on:** September 05, 2002, 01:41:20 PM »

Model it too for the Dora and model the improved pilot G resistance in 109 by pilot seating

.

a Wise dog said once:
This thread, "is good for me, to poop on!"

whgates3 · « **Reply #56 on:** September 05, 2002, 01:46:28 PM »

Quote

Model pilot gut, glasses, physical strength, hay fever, colds, headaches, morning after hangover etc etc etc

hangovers are taken care of by breating pure O2 @ sea level before mission. headaches are part of the hangover. with drastic alt variance everyone has sinus problems. no pollen at angels 20. and you didn't mention venerial diseases

-ammo- · « **Reply #57 on:** September 05, 2002, 02:08:33 PM »

Well, my point is, they know, I know they know, and personally dont care if they adjust out 10 MPH. I still get plenty of kills in it and my enjoyment level is still way up there.

straffo · « **Reply #58 on:** September 05, 2002, 02:56:53 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Heinkel
After a few allied whines, the p38 got fixed. The typhoon got it's Drop tanks.

you are joking or plain ignorant ?

Heinkel · « **Reply #59 on:** September 05, 2002, 03:22:16 PM »

Compraed to some of the LW stuff, there were only a few allied requests to fix the p38/give typhoon DT. It is obvious the Typh. was missing it's DT. It's obvious the 190A-5 is missing some speed. Thats all I am saying....