Author Topic: Feedback Please  (Read 1425 times)

Offline TheBug

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5652
Feedback Please
« Reply #15 on: September 12, 2002, 10:42:31 AM »
Looks like a great setup Wotan.

If this does become the setup a week from this Friday, how about we get the ball rolling for some CT squad/pilots coordination??  How about the tuesday night(9-10pm EDT) of this setup?? Seems to be the most popular night.  We could kinda setup our own mini scenario in the CT.  With some squads/pilots flying an escorted B17 raid and the other forming the intercepting LW forces.

Just an idea.  Anybody interested?
“It's a big ocean, you don't have to find the enemy if you don't want to."
  -Richard O'Kane

Offline Saintaw

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6692
      • My blog
Feedback Please
« Reply #16 on: September 12, 2002, 10:44:06 AM »
Mudd... smart dude :D (Ok, smarter than me...but that's an easy task :p)
Saw
Dirty, nasty furriner.

Offline Soulyss

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6558
      • Aces High Events
Feedback Please
« Reply #17 on: September 12, 2002, 11:06:50 AM »
a setup with the P-51B? I'm happy. :)


I thnk Mu'ds idea is a right good one, my only question is... if you have bombs and rockets disabled at a "fighter" base will that disable drop tanks too?
« Last Edit: September 12, 2002, 11:10:35 AM by Soulyss »
80th FS "Headhunters"
I blame mir.

Offline Wotan

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7201
Feedback Please
« Reply #18 on: September 12, 2002, 11:09:53 AM »
Guys keep the feedback coming but jarbo will be after brady. I have volunteered to be bumped back a week.

I will have more details I will post later as to where I am going with this.

Yes I would love to co-ordinate this set up with guys who are interested in it.

Direct folks to this thread and let your squaddies know. We will try to work it out together.

Offline Saintaw

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6692
      • My blog
Feedback Please
« Reply #19 on: September 12, 2002, 12:09:12 PM »
DT's depend of fuel Soulyss (field fuel needs to be at 125% I think)
Saw
Dirty, nasty furriner.

Offline Soulyss

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6558
      • Aces High Events
Feedback Please
« Reply #20 on: September 12, 2002, 12:15:06 PM »
ahh ok... I wondered what that "extra" 25% was for at fields
80th FS "Headhunters"
I blame mir.

Offline Revvin

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1724
      • http://www.ch-hangar.com
Feedback Please
« Reply #21 on: September 12, 2002, 12:45:52 PM »
I'll pass this thread on to my squad and see if they are interested. MA is becomming very stale.

Offline Wotan

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7201
Feedback Please
« Reply #22 on: September 12, 2002, 12:55:26 PM »
thanks revvin any suggestions you or your guys have please post umm.

Offline Löwe

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 821
      • http://www.geocities.com/duxfordeagles
Feedback Please
« Reply #23 on: September 12, 2002, 04:40:14 PM »
Looks good to me Woton. Then again I'm a closet Luftwobble in the service of the IJAAF.:D

Offline eskimo2

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7207
      • hallbuzz.com
Feedback Please
« Reply #24 on: September 12, 2002, 06:32:53 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by HFMudd
My $.02...

- Enable the allied bombers and fighters at *different* fields
- Disable bomb and rocket loadouts at the fighter fields to prevent waves of P38s and Jugs plastering the factories.



I like these ideas!

Still waiting out the CTD bug.

:(

eskimo

Offline Karnak

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23047
Feedback Please
« Reply #25 on: September 12, 2002, 06:48:22 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by HFMudd
- Enable the allied bombers and fighters at *different* fields
- Disable bomb and rocket loadouts at the fighter fields to prevent waves of P38s and Jugs plastering the factories.


Only problem is that the Mosquito and A-20 are kinda useless without their bombs / rockets.  If we had a Mosquito NF.XIX or XXX it would work, but the FB.VI is a poor fighter.

(P-47D-11s only get a single 500lb bomb, but the P-38s, ooh la la....)
Petals floating by,
      Drift through my woman's hand,
             As she remembers me-

Offline Wotan

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7201
Feedback Please
« Reply #26 on: September 12, 2002, 07:13:11 PM »
we cant limit rockets or bombs or any ord loadout.

I want the moosie and in game it only has 50min of fuel with a modifier of 2.0. Like the a20 it wont make a dent in the factory complexes alone.  If I make any fuel mod changes it will need to allow for the p47, spit , mossie and typhoon (if heavy) to get to the the forward axis fields but not allow them to get to the factory complexes. These are just ideas nothing is set yet.

I would like to have some period of nightime so the lancs and mossie guys can get some sort of immersion out of this setup.

Without hvy bombers getting deep into axis territory then this setup will mostly be a channel furball with a few allied raid against epinoy, Florennes, Rheine, and Monchen-Gladbach.

I would like to station the 110g2s and 190a8s at fields around the factories and have the g6s and a5s at the front line fields.

I could tweak the airfield structure hardness, ack lethality and downtimes then they can be used against airfields but it will be harder to shut a field down then it is in the main.

All the allied fields in england are within a sector. So even at different fields it really wont add much.

Anyway gimme your suggestions, ideas.

Offline Easyscor

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10899
Feedback Please
« Reply #27 on: September 12, 2002, 09:36:49 PM »
Sounds like fun and I think Mudd's on to something there.  Fuel load out at the fighter bases might also help limit areas of operation for some aircraft but it wouldn't stop the one way mission guys.

Hope this helps.

snefens has done the fuel burn rate work already.

snefens Fuel burn rates:
http://home14.inet.tele.dk/snefens/index2.htm

The Main Arena burn rate is 2x.

Minutes in the air for this plane set in the MA is as follows but different airspeeds mean completely different penetration into enemy territory!  Then there's the problem of climb rate dropping the maximum speed by... half?... affecting range.  Looks like a math problem, where's mathman? :)

Us Iron

p47d11 -- 38min/+9 with drop tanks=47min.
p38 ----- 37/+26=64
p51b ---- 54/+30=84
B17 ----- 151
B26 ----- 144
A20s ---- 84

Raf
Spit_9 -- 35/+21=56
Typh ---- 27/+13=40
Mossie -- 34/+16=50
Bostons - 46
Lanc ---- 141

Axis
109g6 --- 25/+18=43
190a5 --- 26/+14=40
190a8 --- 31/+14=46
110g2 --- 38/+17=56
Easy in-game again.
Since Tour 19 - 2001

Offline Wotan

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7201
Feedback Please
« Reply #28 on: September 12, 2002, 09:46:57 PM »
main is at 1.5 and the chart I posted above is snefens and is at 2.0

Offline Easyscor

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10899
Feedback Please
« Reply #29 on: September 12, 2002, 11:19:24 PM »
Oh, right.

Chart didn't show in Netscape.
Easy in-game again.
Since Tour 19 - 2001