Originally posted by snafu
I think we should ditch (Bad pun)
runways altogether. I agree ending up on the runway isn't difficult even with a dead engine and bits missing but we have all seen enough video footage of Spits, 109's etc taking off 4,5,6 abreast to know that for fighters at least runways did not really exist in a lot of cases at least to any specific degree. Even landings were only made generally "Into wind" (OK I know they did in the PTO as most fields were dug out of heavily wooded areas etc.
snafu
For your informations fighters have NEVER (not even in WWI) been able to take off on grass. Any photos or films indication otherwise are pure propaganda and falsified, just like the moon missions. I base this on a simple observation.
Landing a HOT LA5, with no gas and a lot of holes spintering the frame. Gronk the gear down, bleed smash, every trick there is since I won't get a good second chance. Touch down, slam on the brakes, end up stopping five feet past the end of the runway.
Trottle up _gently_, apply right rudder and brake to turn around and get back on the runway with the vapors left in the tank, and the undercarriage collapses on the rough terrain.
If an LA5 can't taxi five feet off the end of a runway, nothing has ever taken off on anything but a smooth, FOD screened field. QED.