« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2] 3   Go Down

Author Topic: 262 loadout options.  (Read 3834 times)

Offline Hristo

  • Parolee
  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1150
262 loadout options.
« Reply #15 on: August 14, 2001, 04:09:00 PM »
Trust me, pdog, this one knows how to run  ;)
Logged

Offline ispar

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 383
      • http://None :-)
262 loadout options.
« Reply #16 on: August 14, 2001, 09:34:00 PM »
I think being able to use R4M as an air-launched weapon is a dream we all share  ;). But due to the horrific nature of the weapon, I think that the Geneva Convention may preclude its use  :(.

 :p
Logged

Offline bigUC

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 438
262 loadout options.
« Reply #17 on: August 15, 2001, 06:42:00 AM »
Biggest problem for 262's will be other 262's, not some crappy P-51s  :D
Logged
Kurt is winking at U!

Offline Hristo

  • Parolee
  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1150
262 loadout options.
« Reply #18 on: August 15, 2001, 07:27:00 AM »
And its best friend would be CV ack  ;)
Logged

Offline greens

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1413
Re: 262 loadout options.
« Reply #19 on: December 04, 2009, 01:05:10 PM »
LOOK WHAT I FOUND! kinda old isn't it?
Logged
_-=ELIM EAGLES=-_
in loving memory of OZ <Eagles21>
 miss you bro!

Offline morfiend

  • AH Training Corps
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10471
Re: 262 loadout options.
« Reply #20 on: December 04, 2009, 01:14:33 PM »
Greens,a quick read of the TOS would tell you that this id frowned upon...

 Better hope Skuzzy is in a good mood or there may be a PNG in your future!

  :salute
Logged

Offline AKP

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1294
Re: 262 loadout options.
« Reply #21 on: December 04, 2009, 01:27:59 PM »
Im waitINg for the "Batman" thread bump pic.  :D
Logged

***G3-MF***

Offline Banshee7

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6724
Re: 262 loadout options.
« Reply #22 on: December 04, 2009, 01:29:08 PM »
Waystin has been failing me here lately.   :(
Logged
Tours 86 - 296

Offline Plazus

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2868
Re: 262 loadout options.
« Reply #23 on: December 04, 2009, 01:30:25 PM »
Quote from: Wilbus on August 11, 2001, 01:03:00 PM
Would you Jabo in an expensive perk?  ;)

Hopefully the R4M's will be modelled, maybe the bombs too but I doubt it.

I like to tank bust by strafing with my 4 x 30mms.  :D
Logged
Plazus
80th FS "Headhunters"
Axis vs Allies

Offline Mar

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2204
Re: 262 loadout options.
« Reply #24 on: December 04, 2009, 01:38:13 PM »
Quote from: greens on December 04, 2009, 01:05:10 PM
LOOK WHAT I FOUND! kinda old isn't it?


Keep it up, and you won't be.

Logged
𝒻𝓇𝑜𝓂 𝓉𝒽𝑒 𝓈𝒽𝒶𝒹𝑜𝓌𝓈 𝑜𝒻 𝓌𝒶𝓇'𝓈 𝓅𝒶𝓈𝓉 𝒶 𝒹𝑒𝓂𝑜𝓃 𝑜𝒻 𝓉𝒽𝑒 𝒶𝒾𝓇 𝓇𝒾𝓈𝑒𝓈 𝒻𝓇𝑜𝓂 𝓉𝒽𝑒 𝑔𝓇𝒶𝓋𝑒

  "Onward to the land of kings—via the sky of aces!"
  Oh, and zack1234 rules. :old:

Offline rabbidrabbit

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3910
Re: 262 loadout options.
« Reply #25 on: December 04, 2009, 01:43:35 PM »
Logged

Offline Corrs

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 856
      • TAC Drivers
Re: 262 loadout options.
« Reply #26 on: December 04, 2009, 02:04:11 PM »
Logged
Corrs
The Flying Circus
Head of The Flying Circus Numbnutz Clown Union since 2000
FSO 334th FS Corrs's Nose Art
WARNING: Keep smiley's out of reach of Corrs

Offline StokesAk

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3665
Re: 262 loadout options.
« Reply #27 on: December 04, 2009, 02:23:57 PM »
in
Logged
Strokes

Offline Infidelz

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 449
Re: 262 loadout options.
« Reply #28 on: December 04, 2009, 02:47:10 PM »

Me 262 A-1a/U4
Bomber destroyer version, two prototypes with an adapted 50 mm (2 in) MK 214 (or BK-5 cannon) anti-tank gun in nose.  :banana:

Me 262 A-1a/U5
Heavy jet fighter with six 30 mm (1.18 in) MK 108s in the nose  :cheers:


These would be something. The U4 would have a range advantage over bombers would it not?

Infidelz
Logged

Offline Motherland

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8110
Re: 262 loadout options.
« Reply #29 on: December 04, 2009, 02:49:34 PM »
Quote from: Infidelz on December 04, 2009, 02:47:10 PM
These would be something. The U4 would have a range advantage over bombers would it not?
Theoretically and in game maybe, but in real life the BK5 5cm cannon was useless. There's are reasons those types never made it out of prototype, and the war's end wasn't the only one.

I would love R4M's though.
Logged
Pages: 1 [2] 3   Go Up
« previous next »