Author Topic: What kind of graphics card do you use ? (Read 1683 times)

Blank · « **Reply #60 on:** November 21, 2002, 05:10:15 PM »

Geforce II gts/pro 64 Mb max FPS = 75 on small maps

looking at a new, well everything really,

keep this old one as part of a render farm.

cobra427 · « **Reply #61 on:** November 21, 2002, 06:02:20 PM »

S3 ProSavage KM133 32meg ..... i bet im the only one with a S3 card

and i hate it:p

JB73 · « **Reply #62 on:** November 21, 2002, 06:21:02 PM »

im behind a bit..

gforce MX440 64mb

TheCage · « **Reply #63 on:** November 21, 2002, 06:30:27 PM »

ATI Radeon 9700 Pro 128

Very happy with it too, can fly full tilt and boogie mode in AH as good as my old GForce 3 did with everything turned off

.

fats · « **Reply #64 on:** November 21, 2002, 07:17:52 PM »

Lasse,

No I have no way of knowing it other than admiting having reverse engineered the AH protocol. Sending computer specs during logon is just something that seems logical to me how ever. It would be benefical for HTC to know their customer base's hardware specifications.

// fats

Thorns · « **Reply #65 on:** November 21, 2002, 07:34:33 PM »

geforce2 gts/pro 64mb

Thorns

fats · « **Reply #66 on:** November 21, 2002, 07:35:20 PM »

AKS\/\/ulfe,

There are numerous pieces of software that report various things about your system, usage habits and the like back to the vendor and they all aren't from Micros~1. Common to the software how ever is that they all do run on Micros~1 operating systems.

Do a search for spyware on google to get an idea. The term often linked with adware, but there's nothing that tells you what any software that has a net connection and a closed protocol is sending out. One popular P2P program goes even as far as claims to have the right to donate your CPU cycles to a 3rd party for letting you share files with their software.

I worked for a company that made/makes a 3D benchmark tool and the ammount of data in the packet sent from a user's computer was quite impressive. Which wasn't so bad since you had to press "send" to send anything but if I recall right the user didn't know exactly what was being sent.

// fats

paulieb · « **Reply #67 on:** November 21, 2002, 07:48:46 PM »

Asus GF4 Ti 4200 128 meg DDR... and loving it!! Without FPS limiter, hitting 120+ alone, 70ish in furball @ 1024x768, 32 bit color.

I know, I know...with that card, why am I running at such a low res.... answer: crappy Phillips 107S monitor.

715 · « **Reply #68 on:** November 21, 2002, 07:58:42 PM »

GF3 Ti500 64MB run at 1600x1200x32bit color
(I once turned AH to max res just to try it out and apparently forgot to turn it back)

Octavius · « **Reply #69 on:** November 21, 2002, 08:05:12 PM »

Geforce 3 Ti200 with a wonky fan, soon to be Geforce 4 Ti4600... or a Radeon 9700

Swager · « **Reply #70 on:** November 21, 2002, 08:51:22 PM »

MSI GeForce2 Pro 64M

Constant 59 FPS

1024x768, 32-bit

AKDejaVu · « **Reply #71 on:** November 21, 2002, 10:48:14 PM »

primary: GeForce4 Ti4600
Second: Radeon 8500

Sandman · « **Reply #72 on:** November 21, 2002, 11:00:22 PM »

Kyro Prophet 4500 64MB FPS is typically in the 20-30 range. FWIW, I borrowed a friends GF4 card. No big improvement in FPS other than the orange sky problem that Kyro seems to have.

Biggest limitation is the CPU, I think... Athlon 750.

Ack-Ack · « **Reply #73 on:** November 21, 2002, 11:49:12 PM »

GeForce 3 Ti 200 128 meg

Ack-Ack

Karnak · « **Reply #74 on:** November 22, 2002, 12:16:56 AM »

Athlon XP 1800+ (1533mhz)
GeForce 4 Ti4600
512mb PC2100
Windows XP Pro