banana,
Why did the CMs want the Kate?
That still makes no sense to me. With the aircraft we have it is impossible to do an early war Pacific senario without giving the US a non-historical advantage. That is great if you want the Japanese to be a punching bag so that the USN fliers can live their "Turkey Shoot" fantasies, but its real bad if you actually want players to fly for the Japanese.
I don't blame Pyro for adding the B5N2, but I do blame the CMs for it.
The US has:
A better fighter: F4F-4 vs. A6M2
A better torpedo bomber: TBM-3 vs. B5N2
A better dive bomber: SBD-5 vs. D3A1
A better torpedo: USN, 1944 type vs. crappy German airial torp
More players: More players always fly for the US than for Japan.
The B6N2 would have been a vastly better foil for the TBM-3. I know that the B6N2 was not available in the early war, but neither was the TBM-3. Further, it is highly unlikely that another Japanese torpedo bomber will ever be added, so we will be stuck flying B5N2s in 1944 and 1945 setups simply because it has hinomarus on it.
For the B5N2 to be balanced we'd need the TBD Devastator. I have never seen a request for that aircraft. The CMs seem quite content to setup a situation that preordains who wins and loses.
I, for one, will push for the B5N2 to be subbed in for the TBD Devastator in early pacific setups.
As it stands now the B5N2 is useless in the MA, it is useless in the CT and it is useless in scenario events.