Originally posted by Karnak
banana,
Why did the CMs want the Kate?
That still makes no sense to me. With the aircraft we have it is impossible to do an early war Pacific senario without giving the US a non-historical advantage.
snip
The US has:
A better fighter: F4F-4 vs. A6M2
A better torpedo bomber: TBM-3 vs. B5N2
A better dive bomber: SBD-5 vs. D3A1
A better torpedo: USN, 1944 type vs. crappy German airial torp
More players: More players always fly for the US than for Japan.
snip
As it stands now the B5N2 is useless in the MA, it is useless in the CT and it is useless in scenario events.
Beg to differ a bit, sir. Not that you don't have some good points (I agree you do) but I believe you're too extreme in your conclusion. While there are some balance problems inherent in the as-yet limited planeset, IMO its *FAR* from "useless", and an early war scenario is *FAR* from impossible.
A few counter-points:
Agreed F4F-4 vs A6M2 isn't the correct matchup. But, until we get an F4F-3, IMO its not a bad thing to simply substitute the A6M5 for the A6M2, and we have a better balance. Not exactly historic, but still immersive enough, and better than nothing. (And I'd actually rather see an early P39 or P400 added before the F4F-3.)
Agreed Devastator is more accurate than TBM for the early stuff, and that TBM is a superior plane to Kate. But, OTOH, the torp planes don't actually interact directly like the fighters, so its feasible in scenario design to include balancing factors such as fudging the Kate numbers slightly higher and TBM numbers slightly lower, delaying launch times, creating points differentials, etc. Again, a little imagination is required, but immersion is nonetheless possible.
Repeat the last para re: SBD vs Val.
The torpedo thing is IMO your most valid beef. If you're right (I'm kinda new to AH, not completely up to speed on game specs) about IJN planes using a German torpedo, then I'd agree its pretty damned important that HTC fix this situation - either by modeling the correct torpedo, or by allowing CMs to assign the same torp to both sides' planes.
OTOH, for the purposes of a scenario, as I pointed out above its possible to hedge the rules to help balance things, and this could be applied to the torpedo situation in the meantime.
Lastly, the point about people preferring to fly US is absolutely true, my experience from AW scenarios confirms it. However, its very easy to control how many people fly which side. If the scenario design has less slots for US and more for Japan, then your complaint becomes irrelevant.
I do thank you for thinking in detail about scenario-related issues, and the thoughtful discussion. The arena is only a place to practice for scenario play, after all!
~S~
culero (scenario addict)