Author Topic: Game of the Year? (Read 2431 times)

Pfunk · « **Reply #15 on:** December 26, 2002, 04:34:08 PM »

Won't happen. UGA is to pumped up not to mention that within a 2 week period they lost 1 guy b/c he slept thru a final, and the other one got in to some trouble at a local mall. With a UGA win we will more than likely have the best recruiting class in the southeast. That and a class act coach will mean very good things for the Dawgs in the next few years, I'd even venture to say a Nat'l Championship within the next 3 years. Bama is in for a world of hurt, still on probation AND a new coach. Ole Zook will probably not make it thru next season, Fulmer-well cant say much about the Pumpkin, but Tenn. might turn it around.

Wilbus · « **Reply #16 on:** December 26, 2002, 06:29:46 PM »

Woho! 1780 points in the Michael Jackson game. I have Exelent parrental skills!

Airscrew · « **Reply #17 on:** December 26, 2002, 07:25:07 PM »

Man!, only 970 points,...no way the modeling is right,...do babies really fall that fast? And why such a small basket? The basket should be at least twice that size, I have pictures somewhere.
This games sux, I quit

AirScrew

TWOLF · « **Reply #18 on:** December 27, 2002, 12:23:33 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by MajTom
Man!, only 970 points,...no way the modeling is right,...do babies really fall that fast? And why such a small basket? The basket should be at least twice that size, I have pictures somewhere.
This games sux, I quit

AirScrew

ROFL!!

"The Game is working as designed."

Staga · « **Reply #19 on:** December 27, 2002, 12:38:43 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by Revvin
Best of 2002:
RTS: Age Of Mythology

uhh the AI in that game sucks BAD.
It's funny to see how people get slaughtered because they don't see enemy standing behind their backs slashing 'em with the swords...

IMHO "Haegemonia:Legions of Iron" is much better and so is "Warcraft III".

funkedup · « **Reply #20 on:** December 27, 2002, 12:45:46 AM »

2001 was such a good year for games that I have not had time for the 2002 games.
Madden 2003 is the best one I have played.

mrsid2 · « **Reply #21 on:** December 27, 2002, 02:00:59 AM »

Creamo, the idea and looks of BF1942 were great.. But the coding was not.

I haven't had the chance to test the game in full retail patched version, but the beta sucked HARD, especially in the most important aspect, net coding.

koala · « **Reply #22 on:** December 27, 2002, 02:23:10 AM »

Quote

I haven't had the chance to test the game in full retail patched version, but the beta sucked HARD, especially in the most important aspect, net coding.

The latest patch fixes all that.

mrsid2 · « **Reply #23 on:** December 27, 2002, 02:48:12 AM »

I still prefer Americas Army over BF1942..

fffreeze220 · « **Reply #24 on:** December 27, 2002, 03:58:41 AM »

what is the currently newest patch for BF ???
1.2 ?
And does it really fix the net coding ?
Even in LAN it was terrible

Revvin · « **Reply #25 on:** December 27, 2002, 05:15:26 AM »

Compared to AOM I find Warcraft III incredibly shallow but fun for the occasional head to head. Battlefield 1942 is stil la dog even after it was patched to v1.2. The net code is a quantum leap over the original release but still not a patch on any of the other FPS games out there. I enjoy America's Army too but for the overall fun factor I found UT 2003 with it's various game types a little more entertaining.

Drex · « **Reply #26 on:** December 27, 2002, 10:12:05 AM »

My nod goes to Battlefield 1942.

Drex

Creamo · « **Reply #27 on:** August 10, 2003, 06:14:14 AM »

With the 1.4 patch. and the new MODS, it might win again for 2003.

It's THAT GOOD. Buy it, or patch it and try it again.

And don't expect to fly in it and have fun, the planes seem to be included just so the developers could claim they did it all, which they nearly did.

I don't like the online part of it as well as linking 2 or more computers together and going co-op against the AI. Actually, I urge you to try it in this format. It's a blast.

I'm telling you, it's damn near the best game I've ever played. The patches just iced it.

If you get bored or need a strat boost, there is alot it provides, like this.

Drunky · « **Reply #28 on:** August 10, 2003, 12:13:16 PM »

Creamo,

Have you played WWIIOL?

If so, would you consider BF1942's ground war more fun and entertaining than WWIIOL?

Note: This is not to start a flame fest pertaining to WWIIOL. This is an honest question since I might buy BF 1942.

Animal · « **Reply #29 on:** August 10, 2003, 12:15:45 PM »

Splinter Cell