Author Topic: luffwobble abuse? (Read 11108 times)

AKIron · « **Reply #240 on:** January 01, 2003, 04:20:56 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Toad
Jeez, Iron... I hope that last doesn't cause you to take to drunkenness, beat your wife or consider slashing your wrists.

Try to be strong!

I've been looking for a good excuse to beat my wife, if it wasn't for the fact that she would kick my bellybutton I might have tried.

Wilbus · « **Reply #241 on:** January 02, 2003, 04:55:59 AM »

Quote

I think everyone should just go out and get drunk tonight. What are the odds of that?

I did too, new years eve, still hungover...

Tumor · « **Reply #242 on:** January 02, 2003, 06:29:59 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by hitech
Grun: You are trying hard to shift blame to the wrong people.

It is very simply the Luftwhiners that caused and continue to cause there own problems, don't expect any sympathy from me or some stupid politcly correct use of words. They need to clean up there act, the rest will follow with out much help.

HiTech

Wow... we'll we all know where we stand in the good'ole boy network around here now don't we LOL!!

Toad · « **Reply #243 on:** January 02, 2003, 06:53:12 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by Tumor
Wow... we'll we all know where we stand in the good'ole boy network around here now don't we LOL!!

"we"?

Check HT's post of 12-31-2002 10:06 AM to see if the shoe fits.

If it does, it has nothing to do with any network.

Tumor · « **Reply #244 on:** January 02, 2003, 08:57:39 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by Toad
"we"?

Check HT's post of 12-31-2002 10:06 AM to see if the shoe fits.

If it does, it has nothing to do with any network.

Threads like these make the bbs interesting. The best part is watching the same old hands line up to suck-up to HiTech again and again while drooling at the opportunity of a pig-pile. Reminds me of elementary playground activity lol.

K98k · « **Reply #245 on:** January 02, 2003, 09:09:32 AM »

Quote

"The best part is watching the same old hands line up to suck-up to HiTech again and again while drooling at the opportunity of a pig-pile."

tend to agree with ya on that one

AKDejaVu · « **Reply #246 on:** January 02, 2003, 09:11:09 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by Tumor
Threads like these make the bbs interesting. The best part is watching the same old hands line up to suck-up to HiTech again and again while drooling at the opportunity of a pig-pile. Reminds me of elementary playground activity lol.

And it isn't the same "old hands" once again here talking about how persecuted they are for acting like an ass?

AKDejaVu

Toad · « **Reply #247 on:** January 02, 2003, 09:16:21 AM »

Interesting view. Not making baseless accusations of bias is considered "sucking up" I guess.

AKIron · « **Reply #248 on:** January 02, 2003, 09:36:17 AM »

I guess the "good ole boy network" is whatever group you may feel left out of or disagree with?

Rude · « **Reply #249 on:** January 02, 2003, 09:52:42 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by GRUNHERZ
Then youre a whiner...

Now I thought you had a problem with this particular type of name calling?

Tumor · « **Reply #250 on:** January 02, 2003, 12:05:28 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Toad
Interesting view. Not making baseless accusations of bias is considered "sucking up" I guess.

Hey I guess if you were King your ~opinion~ could be mandated as fact eh?

culero · « **Reply #251 on:** January 02, 2003, 01:35:13 PM »

HOLY BS THREAD THAT WON'T DIE

culero

GRUNHERZ · « **Reply #252 on:** January 02, 2003, 02:30:14 PM »

Well rude my position is that most people here whine a lot, and that pretty much the only group singled out categorically for whining and attacked syatematically for it regardless if its a genuine whine are the "luftwhiners". Just go look at lazs current GV thread, sure some people disagree with him but none of it reaches the vitriol spewed out if for example a LW guy complained that GV 50cals are overdone or why arent his acts condeming every USN type in AH as a whiner.

And Toad I find it funny how you think what were saying are "baseless accusations" how exactly do you know what somebodys experience here is when they are being made fun of and harrased like this- especially when you and your friends are often the attackers?

Its also interesting that the playground analogy comes up again...

hitech · « **Reply #253 on:** January 02, 2003, 03:13:15 PM »

Grunherz: I agree with you on the only group getting singled out.

The question is WHY they get singled out. My contention is because it's the only group that whines in a harmony that echos on forever. All other groups are purly solo, hence not groups.

And if you don't belive it echos on forever none stoping, here is a post I made 2 months ago.

Quote

Hazed, let me lay it out for you. What funkedup is refering to in the squeeky wheel, is not that the items you disagree with in the game are the squeeky wheels, wrather that YOU are a squeeky wheel. The resone why are simple statements like this.

"The cooling times question i asked I tried my damndest to understand your explanation but I still dont have a clear indication of the reasons for the differing times in AH."

On that issue I answered you twice. Yet here we are at least a month later and you are once again squeeking about it.

We try look into any VALID discussion of flight modling that could be incorect, and have responded to some like the rocket pod jetison before.

That question is a choice on our part to make them not jetisonable, because all players would just jetison after use, and that is not how they were used. The jetison was for emergancy only, and not disposable. There for in an effort to be more realistic we chose not to have them jetisonable. And now once again just this statment will lead to another heated argument.

So now who is it that is causing the "TONE" of this type of statements?

"As i see it the whole tone of some of the threads is detrimental to AH as they often hint at HTC ignoring or avoiding the issues brought forward."

HTC by not spending the time holding the hands ,and giving a few squeeky players extra atention?

Or the "SQUEEKY" players who tend to only bring up items that would make there beloved planes better?

I'm not positive about this, but where in the last year have you posted an item where any LW plane is to good at somthing?

And if you realy belive that me answereing your first question would make an issue stop, I belive you are greatly mistaken.

The out come would be one of a few.

If I said yes, we are looking into it. Then we decided it's ok. You would come right back at us and argue some more that it's NOT ok.

If I said we have looked into it, and it's OK you would then bring the topic back up again in 2 weeks. Or just go away stomping your feet claming we don't care about accuracy.

A lot of the time the best way for us answere this stuff, is to not respond until we are positive we are going to change somthing.

Even then it can work out better if we just change it, and put it in the readme at release.

There was a post a few days back how incorect or ar234 was because it had a skid not wheels, should I imeaditly respond that we will look into it. Or that no you are mistaken, take time diging up the resources on which version had what to get into that discusion?

Please realize that when you belive that somthing is incorect the burden of proof lies with you, it is not our job to prove what we have is correct. The resone is simple, how many times and to many people would have to keep proving it.

HiTech

Is the wheel still squeeking in harmony?

HiTech

Commander rialbh · « **Reply #254 on:** January 02, 2003, 03:13:58 PM »

I am say once more, ME 163 fly like bad brick. Fix it or I am quit AH. Not to return mind you!!:mad: