Author Topic: a question  (Read 319 times)

Offline Dnil

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 879
a question
« on: January 13, 2003, 05:46:52 PM »
The only decent photo I have found of the A-20 tunnel gun, I have already posted.  Now I have some emails out awaiting replies for more data.  The question is, is it worth it?  I mean does HTC wanna model the tunnel gun or are there other more pressing items on their plate?

I also found torpedo director information on the A-20, gives full detail on its use and operation.  I tells you exactly how to use it.  Again is this worth the effort?

I know its not a spit or pony so no one really cares but its a project of mine.

Offline funkedup

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9466
      • http://www.raf303.org/
a question
« Reply #1 on: January 13, 2003, 05:52:36 PM »
Like there's no armament errors on the Spit!

I hope they put the tunnel gun in there though.  :)

Offline hazed-

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2467
      • http://combatarena.users.btopenworld.com
a question
« Reply #2 on: January 13, 2003, 06:01:56 PM »
a fair question i think dnil.

Offline Innominate

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2702
a question
« Reply #3 on: January 13, 2003, 06:13:46 PM »
What does it matter wether or not HTC will do anything about it?  (Though I REALLY hope they do!!)

Post it all anyways!  The A-20 is too cool of a plane.  At the very worst you'll have one person insterested in seeing any info on it.

Offline brady

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7055
      • http://personal.jax.bellsouth.net/jax/t/y/tyr88/JG2main.html
a question
« Reply #4 on: January 13, 2003, 07:17:09 PM »
HTC does fix stuff like this, their a precedent for them having done so in the past, and the A20G is a very popular plane, frankely I suspected to see it last patch, the tunel, but who knows maybe we will see in the future, I for one hope so.

Offline Jester

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2753
a question
« Reply #5 on: January 13, 2003, 10:38:12 PM »
Post it Brady.
Lt. JESTER
VF-10 "GRIM REAPERS"

WEBSITE:  www.VF10.org

Offline brady

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7055
      • http://personal.jax.bellsouth.net/jax/t/y/tyr88/JG2main.html
a question
« Reply #6 on: January 13, 2003, 11:13:52 PM »
Post what?

   What thye have fixed, amended?

   Panzer IVH: The added the hull gunner position, although it is a sloppy adation, they dident model the gunsigt for it, but it is very usable, I even get some kills aganst aircraft with it, totaly unrealistic but hey, they added it after several post's were put up requesting it, some of which I started.

    La-5, La-7: Bomb load option was added and an attack function.

   N1K2-Ja: They added the larger ammo load which the plane had as apposed to the lighter one which was the only choice for a long time.

   MC.202: Improved ROF for the 12.7mm Bredas added after post's indicated somthing was porked.

   AR 234: Added the 20mm Gun's, be nice if they did a sight though.

   Typhoon: added Drop tanks

  Metric bomb weight issue: They corrected the pound metric equilvency that was hampering metric ordance from being as effective as it should be.

   Attack mode: many planes modified to have an attack mode, most notably the JU 88.

   Preformance tweaking: All allied plane are now better than they shpould be.

  Did I say that?:)

   Most all of the above were the result of people posting about issues they had uncovered, their are more I am shure these are just the ones I can remember off hand, also preformance issues have been adreased in the past based on findings and on Whining, the NiK2-J was neuterd do to constant whining by historicaly chalenged players.:)

   HTC does listen to people this is a fact, and they are not above admiting a mistake and corecting it, the list above shows this to be so.