buff guns need to be turned down at long range

[Pongo]

 

Originally posted by Pavel:
Buffs are fine as is.  I can understand newcomers having a bit of trouble with them, but this incessant boohooing from bonafide fighter studs is simply pathetic.

That pretty much sums it up.

[SpyHawk]

Hehe, posting my solution again.

Why everybody keeps ignoring my idea?  

1. Keep the .50's the same for all planes (Pyro says they already are, cool, that's fine)

2. BUT! Increase recoil dispersion so buff gunners cannot so easily maintain the water-hose of bullets on a fighter.  

[Pavel]

RE: The water hose analogy.
It's difficult for the fire chief wannabe inside the bomber to give a good soaking to a  moving (from his perspective) target.  I think those that set up camp right off the bomber's back porch deserve to get wet.  Those that practice high closure-high angle attacks stay fairly dry the majority of the time.