Personally, I find disgusting the the liberal way the "Nazi" word and concept is used as of nowadays.
It's utmost stupid to call someone nazi because he is a murder, let alone a liar.
A Nazi is a Nationalsocialist. Period. To be a Nazi you don't have just to be a murderer. You have to believe in races superiority, in ethnic cleansing and, ultimately, to physical anihilation of human being considered inferiors or opposing to your concept of life, world and politics as a feasible solution to problems, real or ideological.
I find it sickening how easy anybody uses the word "Nazi". It's amazing how somebody can use that word to refer to the USA or some Western government and his attitude against Iraq, conveniently forgetting that the concept fits much, much better to the Iraqi dictator. And it is plain false to apply it to any current western country.
Having said that, I classify that kind of people in two groups: ignorant illiterates who need serious history reading and people trying to annoy or offend me. To the ones on the first group, I can direct them to a couple of good books about Nationalsocialism's doctrine. To the second ones, simply they wont.
In this story there is one clear Nazi-to-be and he is Saddam. We can argue wether USA stance is better or worse than France's one. But not about who is the "bad guy". If you want to find a torturer, go look for him in Baghdad, and stop chasing shadows.
The blatant truth of the whole issue is that we (the whole world) have to deal with a mean, cruel and no-moral guy who has absolute no respect for any other concept than physical force. In this context, I find USA and allies position much, much more suitable of producing the desired results (peace) than France's and allies one.
Just my oppinion, of course.
