Author Topic: Bush and his 'Bunch of Liars' (Read 2681 times)

Eaglecz · « **Reply #45 on:** March 17, 2003, 04:35:39 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Hortlund
Yeah, everyone who knows me knows all about my communist sympathies. -Imagine rolleyes emoticon here-

ofcourse you are ... just look at the colour of your sign

(or am i already that tired ?

)

AWMac · « **Reply #46 on:** March 17, 2003, 04:39:40 PM »

Oh, king, eh, very nice. And 'ow'd you get that, eh?

By exploiting the workers! By 'angin' on to outdated imperialist dogma which perpetuates the economic and social differences in our society.
If there's ever going to be any progress,--
I didn't know we 'ad a king! I thought we were autonomous collective.
You're fooling yourself! We're living in a dictatorship! A self-perpetuating autocracy in which the working classes-- There you go, bringing class into it again...
That's what it's all about! If only people would--
I *told* you! We're an anarcho-syndicalist commune! We're taking turns to act as a sort of executive-officer-for-the-week--
But all the decisions *of* that officer 'ave to be ratified at a special bi-weekly meeting--
By a simple majority, in the case of purely internal affairs--
But by a two-thirds majority, in the case of more major--

AWMac · « **Reply #47 on:** March 17, 2003, 04:40:22 PM »

Strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government! Supreme executive power derives from a mandate from the masses, not from some... farcical aquatic ceremony!
You can't expect to wield supreme executive power just 'cause some watery tart threw a sword at you!!
I mean, if I went 'round, saying I was an emperor, just because some moistened bink had lobbed a scimitar at me, they'd put me away!

Aha! Now we see the violence inherent in the system!
Come and see the violence inherent in the system! HELP, HELP, I'M BEING REPRESSED!

Oh, what a giveaway! Did'j'hear that, did'j'hear that, eh? That's what I'm all about! Did you see 'im repressing me? You saw it, didn't you?!

blitz · « **Reply #48 on:** March 17, 2003, 04:41:42 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Hortlund
Yeah, everyone who knows me knows all about my communist sympathies. -Imagine rolleyes emoticon here-

Die größten Kritiker der Elche waren früher selber welche

Regards Blitz

America is threatened by Iraq in no way, it's just plain rediculous

Martlet · « **Reply #49 on:** March 17, 2003, 04:44:10 PM »

Another European donut clown.

blitz · « **Reply #50 on:** March 17, 2003, 04:45:01 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by rc51
euro bellybutton clowns LOL

Personally , i liked Charly Rivell better

Regards Blitz

America is threatened by Iraq in no way, it's just plain ridiculous

Rasker · « **Reply #51 on:** March 17, 2003, 04:46:16 PM »

thats "moistened *bint*"

blitz · « **Reply #52 on:** March 17, 2003, 05:16:03 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Rasker
thats "moistened *bint*"

You can weep if ya feel like

Regards Blitz

America is threatened by Iraq in no way, it's just plain ridiculous

MotorOil · « **Reply #53 on:** March 17, 2003, 05:18:19 PM »

I like to stick to name calling... Bush is a moron... Guess he hasn't been in the political scene long enough to realize the international community takes for ever to make up it's mind. He hasn't stuck to his guns on the international political scene and the US also voted for "Threat of serious consequences. " What the hell does that mean? I'm going to come down there and piss on you sheep if you don't disarm?

Who accepted the surrender of a nation after a conflict and allows them to keep an estimated 60% of their amoured forces? Another moron. Now we have the same conflict all over again.

I believe the international community is at fault with the lack of clarity in the first resolution. Does not set a clear guideline, timeline or what consequences mean. It played right into the hands of Sadam.

Bush is using the war on terror as a means to exert US foreign policy on other countries that have something to offer the US economy. I strongly doubt you'll see a buildup of forces in Korea... What do they have the US could take? I guess we'll just have to be content to have another nuclear power on the block with the missles to deliver them.

Inspections are slow but they were inhibiting Iraq as a threat to the US. I would hate to think what one more month, as France was willing to compromise as, would do? Would it make a difference? Probably not, but at the least, Bush would gain more international support and begin to make France look dumb if they do not want to act. Bush has lost support by forcing a US timeline and then not following it himself. Blair will pay for that.

Martlet · « **Reply #54 on:** March 17, 2003, 05:25:13 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by MotorOil

Inspections are slow but they were inhibiting Iraq as a threat to the US. I would hate to think what one more month, as France was willing to compromise as, would do? Would it make a difference? Probably not, but at the least, Bush would gain more international support and begin to make France look dumb if they do not want to act. Bush has lost support by forcing a US timeline and then not following it himself. Blair will pay for that.

More propaganda.

France was not willing to allow one more month. France emphatically stated they would not approve any timeline that had the end result of noncompliance as war. What they proposed, was one more month, then we'll decide what to do. Which would put us exactly where we are today.

MotorOil · « **Reply #55 on:** March 17, 2003, 05:28:57 PM »

Except you'd have a little more international support, say Canada, Mexico and possibly enough for 9 votes... But that would just be screwing with the US timeline.

On the flip side, you could be right.

sling322 · « **Reply #56 on:** March 17, 2003, 05:47:32 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by MotorOil
Who accepted the surrender of a nation after a conflict and allows them to keep an estimated 60% of their amoured forces?

Um...that would be the UN I believe. I seem to recall that Stormin' Norman wanted to keep going and cut the head off the snake in Baghdad, but the UN wouldnt let him.

My, my...its amazing how much people forget in 12 years. Only when its convenient to them though.

blitz · « **Reply #57 on:** March 18, 2003, 01:37:16 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by sling322
Um...that would be the UN I believe. I seem to recall that Stormin' Norman wanted to keep going and cut the head off the snake in Baghdad, but the UN wouldnt let him.

My, my...its amazing how much people forget in 12 years. Only when its convenient to them though.

US instigate a Iraq rebellion because they thought this would blow away a weak Saddam.
Once it started, US military watched Saddams republican guards slaughter the rebellion within 2 weeks and did nothin.
They paid a very high price .

Regards Blitz

America is threatened by Iraq in no way, it's just plain ridiculous

N1kPaz · « **Reply #58 on:** March 18, 2003, 02:13:56 AM »

the usage of English in this thread hilarious is. Like it do I and Yoda appreciate it too probably.

Puke · « **Reply #59 on:** March 18, 2003, 03:01:44 AM »

Quote

Once it started, US military watched Saddams republican guards slaughter the rebellion within 2 weeks and did nothin. -Blitz

The UN didn't do anything either.

But who is doing something now?

So when the USA doesn't do something you have a complaint and when the USA does do something you have a complaint. I can see you just want to complain no matter what.