Originally posted by Saintaw
Tagging poeple under a same brand because they were born on a particular part of soil is utter cretinism.
You sure qualify for that Hortlund
Well Saw, am I judging them on their nationality or on their opinions? Surely you agree that its ok to call an idiot an idiot.
So, I have a poll saying that 33% of the entire French population wants Saddam to win this war. That means there are more Frenchmen who wants to see Saddam win this war than there is Iraqis. Does that sound insane to you? And you really should adress the why question too. Why does 33% of THE ENTIRE FRENCH POPULATION want Saddam to win this war? Why is that Saw? Why?
Moving on, I also have the track record of Chirac-le-worm, he was elected by something like 80% of the French population. And polls in France has shown that his actions in this conflict has had a massive support by the French population.
So...the case against the French so far:
The elected Chirac and they supported his policy. This policy led to a delay of the war that will cause additional casualties beause the US/UK coalition will be forced to fight a war in sandstorm/hot as owen-season. That was before the war started. AFTER the war started, 33% of the French population sided with Saddam, one of the most brutal murderous barbaric dictators there is.
Granted there might be some normal French guys who opposed Chirac (20%) who opposed his policy (even less than 20%) and who support the US/UK coalition now (33%). I have no quarrel with those guys. The rest can ** **** themselves ** **** ******* ******** ************* *****!
But since 80% of them elected Chirac-le-maggot, I think it is fair to use the term "the french" instead of saying "all the french guys except the handful that did not vote for Chirac and who opposed his policy and who supports the war now".