Author Topic: The Iraq-Al Queda connection (Read 2883 times)

straffo · « **Reply #75 on:** April 05, 2003, 02:09:59 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Hortlund
Vulcan already answered that. I guess you missed his post.

And crowMAW wrote a better rebutal than I can have done ...

Hortlund · « **Reply #76 on:** April 05, 2003, 02:17:02 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by straffo
And crowMAW wrote a better rebutal than I can have done ...

LOL no cheese straffo...a 4 yr old kid could write a better rebuttal than you.

straffo · « **Reply #77 on:** April 05, 2003, 02:43:41 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Hortlund
What about it? Pull up the quote where I say it was a "non-allied accident". You should really work on your english comprehension straffo, because it is pretty apparent that you dont really understand what I said in that post on Oradour.

You explained how some poor SS got massacred and how justified was the massacre of 692 persoan as a proper reteliation.

Instead of picking me why don't you answer my question ?

Hortlund · « **Reply #78 on:** April 05, 2003, 02:55:45 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by straffo
You explained how some poor SS got massacred and how justified was the massacre of 692 persoan as a proper reteliation.

Nope, Ive never said that.

Chalk that one up to your poor reading comprehension.

straffo · « **Reply #79 on:** April 05, 2003, 03:10:05 PM »

I'll reformulate :

You used the massacre of wounded SS got to justify the massacre of 692 person as a proper reteliation.

is that better ?

Hortlund · « **Reply #80 on:** April 05, 2003, 03:10:54 PM »

*listens to the sound of straffo feverishly clicking on the search button to go over every single post Ive ever written on this forum*

Hortlund · « **Reply #81 on:** April 05, 2003, 03:12:57 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by straffo
I'll reformulate :

You used the massacre of wounded SS got to justify the massacre of 692 person as a proper reteliation.

is that better ?

Nope, still wrong, and I have never said anything like that either.

straffo · « **Reply #82 on:** April 06, 2003, 03:37:31 AM »

Quote

After Tulle was recaptured by the Germans, an SD unit moved in and shot 98 french civilians "as retaliation"

Hortlund · « **Reply #83 on:** April 06, 2003, 11:38:43 AM »

Yes...so did you notice the "-marks? What exactly do they tell you?

Chalk this one up to your poor english comprehension Straffo.

Not only that, the quote you pulled was regarding Tulle, we were talking about Oradour remember.

You do know what happened to the German garrison in Tulle...right?

Thrawn · « **Reply #84 on:** April 06, 2003, 07:30:49 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by straffo
Now as I don't want to start again a BBS fight with mister I was pretending to be a judge Hortlund.

Pardon? Hortlund lied about being a judge?

Hortlund · « **Reply #85 on:** April 07, 2003, 01:34:34 AM »

Nah, its just staffo and his crappy english confusing the he** out of everyone again.

straffo · « **Reply #86 on:** April 07, 2003, 01:42:43 AM »

posted the 03/11/2003 :

Quote

Originally posted by Hortlund
whatever work I will hold in the future I will do my utmost to chose different suppliers and vendors than French and German ones. I suspect there are a couple of Americans thinking along the same lines.

full post here : http://www.hitechcreations.com/forums/showthread.php?s=&threadid=81357&

Hortlund · « **Reply #87 on:** April 07, 2003, 01:49:31 AM »

So? Do you think I will stay in this job forever? I have said several times that I am looking for a new job right now.

You really should try to improve your language skills straffo, because it is pretty damn obvious that you missunderstand alot.

straffo · « **Reply #88 on:** April 07, 2003, 02:02:00 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by Hortlund
You do know what happened to the German garrison in Tulle...right?

They fought and were loosing when das reich entered the town.

more number as you love them :

139 SS were killed (the SS alleged they were prisonner)

99 civilian were hanged
about 300 people were send to death camp.

Vulcan · « **Reply #89 on:** April 07, 2003, 02:12:33 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by crowMAW
LOL...well the Kurds use Iraqi equipment too. I guess they are in cahoots with Saddam.

And as far as Ansar getting training from the Republican Guard...when that info was passed to US intelligence agencies last year, they decided the info was not reliable. This position was bolstered by the raid on the Ansar camp by US forces last week. While many documents were found that provided strong links to Al Qaeda, which included info on terrorist activities in the US, nothing was found to tie Ansar to Saddam.

I believe that his info about terrorists entering his country is probably not nearly as good as the info the US has about terrorists entering this country.

1) theres a difference between captured equipment and supplied equipment.

2) what did you expect them to find, an autographed picture saying "Saddam was here"? Not reliable information means that the US Govt has no operatives on the ground able to confirm this. 3 months ago people on this very BBS were denying claims that Ansar was linked to Al Qaeda, quoting US intelligence as saying they received info but it 'was unreliable'.

3) Do you really think a dictatorial police state can't spot known terrorists disembarking at the airport formerly know as Saddam? The BBC report I read two months back said the Al Qaeda operatives were flying in under their real names. Like I said I have a big orange bridge I'd like to sell you.

Like I said above, many cried BS on the links between Al Qaeda and Ansar just months ago on this BBS... now what do we find?