A lab isn't a weapon.
Would they have produced a weapon and tried to use it? Most highly possible, but not absolutely.
After all, the very regime has fallen and we still haven't seen any use of "weapons of mass destruction" against anyone. The only instance was the big fiasco where everyone got excited and started cursing Iraq when they HEARD that some US soldiers were donning chemical-protectove gears. Woops, sorry, false alarm.
Now, you guys are trying to justify the invasion against Iraq with the discovery of a lab which might have produced a 'weapon of mass destruction' which 'might' have been used against some country or countries.
What's that spell?
Retribution against a crime that hasn't been committed yet.
The 'aggressive agenda to fight against terrorism' your country is pushing, is something that shakes the very fundament of justice which the democratic ideology has held on to for a very long time.
Your government carries the axe, and dons the executioner's hood. Absolute power to destroy which no other single country possesses in the world, a power that can bring down a country to its knees in three weeks.
Think carefully why the democratic system is so keen on dividing power - no one person or institution has the right to both judge and prosecute by oneself. Now, push the scale up to the world level, and we see a single country which wants to act as a advisor, legislator, policeman, judge, and executioner.
You people now support the code that justifies that US can act with impunity to attack a country which it thinks it might be dangerous. Absolute power meets absolute justification.
...
So which country does the US think it might be dangerous, next? Who is to stop your government when it thinks wrong? From playing God with the lives of other people of other countries?
I pray you people change course from the way of thinking that so obsessively grasped Americans since 9.11. Right now, I'm sorry to say it is terrifying to watch so many people craving for vengeance so bloodthirstily, like mad dogs.
