---------------------------------------------
>>When I did play for few days 1.03, I did play it very much per day during the period and I am alot up for testing things when I do.
I get bored if I can't test things out...
Alot like hackers who are mostly just curious and tests things etc., though, I am not hacker and I don't know anything about hacking.. but those people are curious like me.<<
--------------------------------------------
Hackers are not necesarily curious. They can be, and often are, malicious people not intent on "finding things out" but causing problems for others. In short, vandals.
---------------------------------------------
>>Maybe its just that I talk alot and makes it look like i critize alot?

Usually those critics are more visible than good stuff... (like murder vs. saved wale, get the point?)<<
_____________________________
________________
You do talk a lot, often trying to speak with a tone of being an expert in areas you have no definitive experiance with. The pay and play angle comes in here. You do not support or use the SIM so your comments about it already have a validity problem. Outside criticism about a product you do not use has far less value, is any, than constructive comments from a person who uses the product and wants to see it improved. in other words, you have no "interest or stake" in it.
_____________________________
________________
>>I speak about that what I am somewhat certain and what goes against that what I've read.
I read alot of World War 2, and I have done so for very many years. (IMO its very intresting)<<
_____________________________
________________
History IS interesting. Some of us lived through a good portion of that history and have a first person perspective. This doesn't mean it is all about WW2. There is a lot of history outside of WW2 for the military and aviation. Those of us who have had direct military experiance know a bit more than what you find in the history books. Several of us in this SIM have classified knowledge and can speak far more authoritatively than one who merely reads history from general references.
_____________________________
________________
>>and I might well be heading for military career, at least almost certainly going to army. (Finlands constitution..)<<
_____________________________
________________
Good for you. That will help you build your "personal" knowledge base and help with character biulding as well. If you enjoy the benefits of liberty you should be prepared to help defend and protect it.
_____________________________
________________
>>But then, who in AH really has experience with World War 2? I doubt theres many.<<
_____________________________
________________
Some of us had parents in the war. Quite a few of us studied the material not from an interest point of view but from a professional point of view. There are many lessons from prior conflicts that do not appear in general history books. Quite a bit of information is available to military references only and contain material not available to civilian sources. Military libraries aren't quite the same as civilian ones. Some of us had to learn the material and then teach it in military graduate level courses such as Command and General Staff College and the Air Force equivalent.
There are still veterans of the war alive and they are available for consultation. I know a couple myself personally who flew in WW2. I currently work for a fighter pilot in my civilian job. He has flown F16's and now A10's. There is even a flying P51 at the airport where I work and I have met and talked to the owner.
_____________________________
________________
>>I critize if I have sufficient experience of the subject under main arena conditions, or otherwise very visible flaw that would be most certainly fixed later or sooner even without me.<<
_____________________________
________________
If you are not in the main arena gaining personal experiance, you have no direct knowledge of any "flaws".
_____________________________
________________
>>Then another thing, when I am paying, what will you do then?
I really doubt that paying really has something to do with this.<<
_____________________________
________________
It has everything to do with your criticism of the game. If you are not playing it with the rest of us, you have no direct personal knowledge of any problems. In other words again, you have no expertise in a product you do not use. If you start to play online then others know you are speaking from a position of knowledge, not supposition and inferance. The rest of us will be there to interact with you and let you learn the game by flying and dieing online as we do.
_____________________________
________________
>>I heard recently that there reads in mein kampf that he who yells louder and tells more roadkill, wins.. (I have not verified this though, one guy said that on one chat to a guy who had that quote in his web page)
Anyhow, that seems very true in this UBB.[/B][/QUOTE]<<
_____________________________
________________
There is a cogent observation. You seem to be coming from this very direction. Stop yelling about something you do not do / use. Stop claiming superior knowledge and expertise, particularly when dealing with those who were or are in the profession of arms for real. If you do not fly or have experiance with the weapons don't profess to be an expert. There is book knowledge and then there is real world experiance. Sometimes the two don't match.
If you do not play the game you are certainly not an expert in it. I't's almost the same as walking up to a chess master and telling them how to play chess since you read a book about it and have played a couple of games.
Now this was about as plain and constructive I can be about this. You started the thread and asked for the information. I hope you take it as constructive information as that is the way it was meant. If I had just wanted to flame you it would have been much shorter and certainly more "earthy".
Mav
[This message has been edited by Maverick (edited 08-01-2000).]