bush is a failure

[Rude]

Originally posted by Siaf__csf
Rude so you think it was just a coincidence that the coalition didn't touch any of the sites that claimed to have shields on them? As opposed to the last conflict where those key structures were hit first, in order to destroy the iraqi's means of communication.

You must realise that if even one shield would have been hit, the media would've been all over the coalition leaders? Your country would have been seen as a murdering agressor.

A week of bad press would have turned the general opinnion in US enough to force them to stop the whole campaign. Trust me.

Ok....where did all the human shields go? Why have not even the Arab press hyped them...you know they would if THEY COULD FIND ANY!

Now don't let the purpose of this action confuse you either...ya know the part about rebuilding Iraq? Why would we lay waste to their infrastructure when it's not necessary to win the war and secondly, WE would be the ones to pay to rebuild the same.

Stop acting silly....if ya feel we're the great satan, then just say it....don't try and tell me how MY country and MY President will behave because certain people who don't have the sense to stay out of a war zone, might die by American bombs....that's if we could find any of these human shields in the first place.

Where did they all go? Did any die? If they did perish, did we kill em?

Proof not tripe...fork it over, or perhaps your just runninn your mouth? Which is it?

[AKIron]

heh, good analogy MT

[JoeSmoe]

I have this aching desire to smash Siaf's face against a curb untill he turns red black white and blue through and through.


Hmm maybe its just me.

[Arfann]

Originally posted by JoeSmoe
I have this aching desire to smash Siaf's face against a curb untill he turns red black white and blue through and through.


Hmm maybe its just me.

Let's not hear any self doubt here, Schmuck. It's the American Way! We don't need no stinking diplomacy and dialogue!  Give us blood!!!!!

[Montezuma]

The biggest questions have always related to the aftermath, not defeating Iraq's military.

[Arfann]

Originally posted by john9001
the anti-war,anti-american, liberal ,hollywood, etc crowd said there would be 30-40 thousand US casualties, hundreds of thousands of innocent iraqis killed and the "arab street" would rise up in protest of the imperial boosh/halburton oil cartell attack on the sovereign dictatorship of saddam the butcher of bagdad.

so.....bush is a failure, he has caused none of these things to happen.

As part of the etc crowd, I have to say I am insulted by your insinuations. How about a reference as to who, exactly, forecast those numbers?

[GRUNHERZ]

Originally posted by Arfann
Well, it is now.

That 70% shows that the talking/embedded heads performed well to the uninformed ignorant masses. Never underestimate their ability to follow like sheep.

You see how the USA haters are never happy and never offer an alternative. All of us know that Arfann would be the first to cry CENSORSHIP! if the embeedd reports were not there but now that they were he is crying COLLUSION!

Tell me oh wise USA hater with all the answers what sort of press sytem would you propose to cove a war on this cale.

We know that you are against:

Pooled reporters.
Embedded reporters.

What are you for when it comes to reprting the war?

[Eagler]

Originally posted by midnight Target
I picture GWB driving the World down the road, and turning around to the Arab countries in the back seat, wagging his finger and saying "don't make me pull this car over again!"

LOL
I picture more like the memory I have of my dad, more than once, driving down the road with one hand on the wheel while swinging the belt into the backseat area at us four kids with the other ...

[Siaf__csf]

Rude are you really that simple?

The human shields are not in the press because none of them died. Mission accomplished.

The buildings they were located in were not attacked, the city got taken and they left home. Why would the press make a big deal out of it? Afterall nobody can prove they were the reason for the coalition not bombing the plants, it's just a coincidence that the coalition war plans changed radically..

don't try and tell me how MY country and MY President will behave because certain people who don't have the sense to stay out of a war zone, might die by American bombs

Nice that you seem to acknowledge that the loss if innocent lives is not an issue for you. Anything you want to do, you will do regardless of the loss of lives.

You know, pre-war jokes about Bush ending the long peaceful era had a bit of truth in them, like most good jokes.

What's with the great satan thing? I think you're confusing me with the fundamentalists. You still have a LOT to learn, criticism does not equal hate. You just cant take the critic and get offended for it. You're blinded by your own hate, which is sad.

[GRUNHERZ]

it's just a coincidence that the coalition war plans changed radically..

So you saw the pre-human shields pentagon battle plan?

[Rude]

Originally posted by Siaf__csf
Rude are you really that simple?

The human shields are not in the press because none of them died. Mission accomplished.

The buildings they were located in were not attacked, the city got taken and they left home. Why would the press make a big deal out of it? Afterall nobody can prove they were the reason for the coalition not bombing the plants, it's just a coincidence that the coalition war plans changed radically..



 

Nice that you seem to acknowledge that the loss if innocent lives is not an issue for you. Anything you want to do, you will do regardless of the loss of lives.

You know, pre-war jokes about Bush ending the long peaceful era had a bit of truth in them, like most good jokes.

What's with the great satan thing? I think you're confusing me with the fundamentalists. You still have a LOT to learn, criticism does not equal hate. You just cant take the critic and get offended for it. You're blinded by your own hate, which is sad.

Nice try.....you're transparent in your motives and very predictable.

[Syzygyone]

Originally posted by midnight Target
I picture GWB driving the World down the road, and turning around to the Arab countries in the back seat, wagging his finger and saying "don't make me pull this car over again!"

hehehe, That's pretty good, and very accurate, but the operative image isn't the pulling over, it's that the USA is driving the world down the road and all they can do is go along for the ride.

That's what has got all the EUers all upset.  The USA is in charge! The USA has the responsibility and has earned the right to be in charge.  Our systems, our beliefs, our culture, our blood, sweat and tears, have produced a preeminent society while their efforts, if there were any, have not.  And, there ain't nothin' they can do about it except look in the mirror to see who is to blame that their "has been" societies, are just that, irrelevant has beens, that haven't added to the common good for fifty or sixty years, or more!.

Oh I can't wait to see Siaf and Gronk and Blitz starting wailing now!

[Sandman]

Which is okay until one of the kids in back puts a partially masticated gumball in the driver's hair.

[Curval]

Originally posted by midnight Target
I picture GWB driving the World down the road, and turning around to the Arab countries in the back seat, wagging his finger and saying "don't make me pull this car over again!"

LOL...and every once in a while he has to hit the brakes.  When he does this his arm shoots out instinctivly to stop Israel from going through the windshield..just like a natural soccer mom.

[Staga]

Originally posted by Syzygyone
The USA has the responsibility and has earned the right to be in charge.  Our systems, our beliefs, our culture, our blood, sweat and tears, have produced a preeminent society while their efforts, if there were any, have not.  

errrr culture? when did you got one?