Grunherz,
"certain group" pretty much means this one journalists group.
I doubt this reporter knows much of the language, so he will need a translator and he can also have some co-worker(s) with him.
and I did no direct 'lie' accusation there, I simply said I'm bit sceptical about all these serious accusations by some journalist, whos once again "found" documents from an agency.
Theres been no official word yet.
I don't take news papers accusations based on one journalist as any kind of conclusive evidence.
Theres a history full of similar kind of hyberdoles by journalists, which have proven to be false.
Or what was with the hyperdoling of found WMD plants, which later on, in an official announcement, proven to be false.
News agencies just took all out of it without questioning much and even adding their own speculations in their articles, to make it even further interesting read.
So go figure.
Can I apply to be a journalist and then reveal secret a coup against french goverment from some US agency and without further proofs, tell the world about it?-)
Hmm.. yes I could.
But would anyone really believe? no... people wouldn't really believe in it, they aren't expecting such things.
Aren't you guilty of something here, Grunherz?
You're immediatly claiming I said it's an outright lie, when I were just being sceptic.
It is easier being in denial than accept controversary views.
btw. it's an anti-french US right now, it wouldn't surprise me at all if some journalist would make up something about french connections with Iraq - h-ell, that would sell alot!
People are DROOLING over anything anti-french and the news agency would be having only a very small risk of loosing money in it compared to the gains.
How much do you figure the sunday times has gained with this news or the journalist himself?
I remind you once again; news agencies have done it several times and yet again in the past, what would stop them now?
Any source like that, is not worth believing stone hard until theres further proofs/word on it.