Crow: Right...do you believe we should use military force to regime change simply to set up new governments friendly to the US?
No, I don't. Apparently you don't either. However, I also don't believe that Iraq would have been invaded by the US IF Hussein had complied with the terms of the '91 ceasefire and the following 12 years of ~17 UN/SC resolutions to get them to comply.
However, there's a Democratic Presidential "hopeful"that appears to think so. Is Graham a PNAC? Have the PNAC's penetrated the Democratic leadership?
Presidential hopeful Graham slams Bush "I think they made a mistake," the former Florida governor told ABC's "This Week," referring to the Bush administration's rejection of his plan to give the president authority to go after Hamas, Hezbollah and Islamic Jihad, three organizations Graham calls the "A-list" of terrorist groups that operate largely from Syria.
"They did not want that particular ball in their court," he said.
Saying that those three organizations need to go, Graham proposed telling the Syrians they could no longer harbor terrorists and should resolve the situation immediately.
"If they don't, then [the U.S.-led coalition that toppled the Taliban] will take care of it," he said. "The 'it' is not regime change; the 'it' is those terrorist organizations."
Looks like Graham adocates invading Syria to eliminate the terrorist organizations based there. I'm wagering that would take longer than the Iraq operation. What do you think?
Crow: Although I'm not sure I would categorize the Republican Congress as a group willing to capitulate to Clinton's will. It seems we had some Federal government closings over budget fights during those years.
Are you characterising the present Congress as willing to capitulate to Bush's will? If so, tell me why Bush's tax cut has been reduced by 30% and it's looking like it will be reduced even further.
I'm sorry, I just don't see this monolithic PNAC block rolling over all opposition in our government. I think the framer's set up a remarkably good system although I'm sure they never envisioned special interest groups to the extent we suffer them today. Nonetheless, PNAC doesn't rule the country. They're not even close. And they too will fade. Imagine, for instance if the Dems finally find a reasonable candidate and they win in 2004. How will the PNAC ogre react? Open revolution in the streets? I doubt it. They'll fade into the background again.
I just seem to be unable to lose any sleep over PNAC. I've got other real problems that keep me awake.