Author Topic: LANCASTER III  (Read 908 times)

Offline Sundog

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1781
LANCASTER III
« Reply #45 on: August 04, 2000, 12:29:00 PM »
Wow!
Can't wait to woof some `cookies' out of that bird!  

   


[This message has been edited by Sundog (edited 08-04-2000).]

deluxe

  • Guest
LANCASTER III
« Reply #46 on: August 04, 2000, 01:46:00 PM »
Great Job HT  !!!!!!!!
This momma will be able to take down 4 hangers w/ it's 14,000 bomb load ,yeeeeeee haaaaaa.  Ya better get up and shoot this buff down before it closes your base !!!!!!

Offline kfsone

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 22
      • http://www.kfs.org/~oliver
LANCASTER III
« Reply #47 on: August 04, 2000, 02:42:00 PM »
*nate*

Comparing the screenshot with some more pics I have of Lancs... I couldn't put my finger on it until just now...

The nacelles in the shot look distinctly like Spitfire noses =) The real things look a bit more 'muscular'. Like the nose of a labrador compared to the nose of a greyhound?


Oliver

skippy

  • Guest
LANCASTER III
« Reply #48 on: August 06, 2000, 01:11:00 AM »
14,000 # load  ..   hehe  watch out A1 ! Looks great !  where's the belly gun?  

[This message has been edited by skippy (edited 08-06-2000).]

Offline NATEDOG

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1186
LANCASTER III
« Reply #49 on: August 07, 2000, 09:52:00 AM »
Thnx KFS, I'll look into it.


------------------
Nathan "NATEDOG" Mathieu
Art Director
HiTech Creations
-=HELLFIRE SQUAD=-

".... And on the eighth day, God created beer. "

RAF71_TC

  • Guest
LANCASTER III
« Reply #50 on: August 07, 2000, 10:26:00 AM »
The absence of a gun possition below the aircraft was and is one of this magnificent aircrafts most significant downfalls. The rear gun position can pivit down to about a 150 degrees but then the gunner would be smaking his head agains the glass trying to follow a bogey.

Atleast they modeled the twin 50cals in the picture, there was a model that flew with .303 of I remember correctly. Nice thing about the gun positions is they were able to carry more ammo then the American counterpart the B-17.

High altitude or very low is where this plane will excell in my opinion and from what I have read of its successes in history. I would love to see some dams in AH preferably next to the various cities located throughtout.

BOOM! aaaahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh splash! gurgle gurgle gurgle!  



------------------
TC
Eagles AM
http://www.eagle-nest.org

Offline Thrax

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 23
      • http://www.pczone.co.uk
LANCASTER III
« Reply #51 on: August 07, 2000, 10:53:00 AM »
Hehehehe

Spit Dweeb and Lancaster Bore at your service.

Some pros and cons of the Lanc (and all its varients)

1) Max Service ceeling 25,000 feet. (Yup, that's right)

2) Up till 1944 ALL Lancs were gunned by .303s NOT .50 cals. The reason for this being that as they flew unescorted, at night, they needed to limit the range of the guns so they didnt end up shooting each other down (.303s very nasty at close range, utterly useless at long range)

After 1944 Lancasters were opperated in daylight, and equiped with .50 cals for both daylight and night opps. But they were still vunerable.

3) Payload unmodified 14,000 lbs. Usual Pay load was 4,000 cookie, 8, 0000lbs eggs and 2,000 incend.

4) Dont expect climb to be more than 250 feet/min

5) But as a bombing platform, this was the best in terms of pay load till the B29 arrived.

 
Lancaster Mk.I/III

 
Lancaster Mk.II

 
Lancater Mk.BI (Special) - Grandslam


General Lancaster Data
Crew of seven:

Pilot, Flight Engineer, Navigator, Bomber Aimer, Wireless Operator and two Air Gunners.

Engines:

Mk.I

Four Rolls-Royce Merlin XX or 22, 12 cylinder 60 degree vee-type liquid cooled inline engines with two stage supercharger.

Mk.II

Four Bristol Hercules VI or XVI, 14 cylinder sleeve-valve, air cooled radial engines with two stage centrifugal superchargers.

Mk.III

Four Packard Rolls-Royce Merlin 224, 12 cylinder 60 degree vee-type liquid cooled inline engines with two stage supercharger.

Mk.X

Four Packard Rolls-Royce Merlin 224, 12 cylinder 60 degree vee-type liquid cooled inline engines with two stage supercharger.

Dimensions:

Span : 102'-0" (31.09 m)

Length : 69'- 6" (21.18 m) - tail up

: 68'-10" (20.98 m) - tail down

Height : 20'- 6" ( 6.25 m) - tail up

: 20'- 4" ( 6.30 m) - tail down

Undercarriage track: 23'-9" (7.24 m)

Wing Area : 1,300 sq.ft (120.80 sq.m)

Tailplane Area: 237 sq.ft (22.0 sq.m)

Tail Fin and Rudder Area: 111.40 sq.ft (10.35 sq.m)

Weights:

Tare : 36,000 lbs. (16,740 kg)

Empty Equipped: 41,000 lbs. (18,600 kg)

Loaded Weight : 45,000 lbs. (20,412 kg)

Normal Gross : 55,000 lbs. (30,840 kg)

Max. Take-off : 72,000 lbs. (32,660 kg)

Performance For Merlin Equipped Lancaster's

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Maximum speed at normal weight:

271 mph (436 km/h) @ 6,250 ft (1,905 m)

281 mph (452 km/h) @ 11,000 ft (3,350 m)

Maximum weak mixture curising speed:

227 mph (365 km/h)

Most economical curising speed:

216 mph (346 km/h) @ 20,000 ft (6,100m)

Maximum permissible diving speed:

360 mph (579 km/h)

Time to climb to 20,000 ft (6,100 m):

41.6 minutes

Rate of climb:

250 ft (76 m) per minute

Service ceiling at maximum weight:

20,000 ft (6,100 m)

Service ceiling at mean weight:

24,500 ft (7,470 m)

Runway length required to take-off and reach 50 ft (15 m) at maximum weight:

1,550 yards (1,420 m)

Landing distance from 50 ft (15 m) at mean weight:

1,000 yards (915 m)

Range:

1,040 miles (1,670 km) with 10,000 lbs (4,540 kg) of bombs.

2,680 miles (4,310 km) with 7,000 lbs (3,180 kg) of bombs with an additional 400 gallon (3,180 L) auxiliary fuel tank installed.

Armament for the standard variant:

2 - 0.303" machine guns in front turret, 4 - 0.303" machine guns in rear turret, 2 - 0.303" machine guns in mid-upper turret,

Maximum bomb load:

14,000 lbs. (6,350 kg) standard variant.

22,000 lbs. (9,979 kg) special variant.

 

 http://www.nucleus.com/~ltwright/LowPass.wav

Click on the above to hear that baby fly by....  

Hazed

  • Guest
LANCASTER III
« Reply #52 on: August 07, 2000, 12:10:00 PM »
beautiful  
ram stop calling brit planes ugly..or show me a pretty spanish one...

Offline Replicant

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3567
LANCASTER III
« Reply #53 on: August 07, 2000, 01:04:00 PM »
Hopefully the loadout will let us choose the following....

Loadout 1:-

14 bombs of either:–

500lb GP; 250lb SAP; 250lb B Mk III; 1000lb USA Type; 500lb SAP; 250lb AS; 600lb AS; 1000lb MC; 250lb GP; 250lb LC; 250lb Small-Bomb containers; 1000lb GP Short Tail type.

Loadout 2:-

8 x 500lb & 6 x 250lb AS (Mk IV only)

Loadout 3:-

6 x 500lb & 3 x 250lb AS and 5 x 250lb SAP

Loadout 4:-

6 x 1000lb & 3 x 250lb GP

Loadout 5:-

1 x 4000lb HC & 6 x 1000lb GP (Short tail type or USA type 1000lb) & 2 x 250lb GP

Loadout 6:-

6 x 1500lb A Mines or 6 x 2000lb HC Bombs

Loadout 7:-

6 x 1900lb & 3 x 250lb GP

Loadout 8:-

6 x 2000lb AP & 3 x 250lb SAP

Regards

'Nexx'
NEXX

coyote

  • Guest
LANCASTER III
« Reply #54 on: August 07, 2000, 10:58:00 PM »
looks pretty, I would like to order mine now...

Antix

  • Guest
LANCASTER III
« Reply #55 on: August 08, 2000, 12:45:00 AM »
Will this plane have rediculous clipping issues as bad as the B-17? Or will they be as subtle yet annoying as all of the other planes?

Offline SFRT - Frenchy

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5420
      • http://home.CFL.rr.com/rauns/menu.htm
LANCASTER III
« Reply #56 on: August 08, 2000, 12:53:00 AM »
I don't understand your question Antix?
Dat jugs bro.

Terror flieger since 1941.
------------------------

Offline StSanta

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2496
LANCASTER III
« Reply #57 on: August 08, 2000, 05:28:00 AM »
I will enjoy shooting down this piece of crap opportunist scrap heap metal collection.

With all those bombs, and no ball turret, even my 109 will be able to bring it down.

 



------------------
StSanta
JG54 "Grünherz"
"If you died a stones throw from your wingie; you did no wrong". - Hangtime

Randon

  • Guest
LANCASTER III
« Reply #58 on: August 08, 2000, 05:51:00 AM »
 
Quote
Originally posted by Replicant:
Hopefully the loadout will let us choose the following....

Is there any danger of having the histocical load outs of BIG BOMBS

4000lb cookies etc
SC with incenderies

Window to screw up radar....

This aircraft is optimised for flattening cities and factories  - not pinpointing acks and hangers.

All it needs is some inventiveness with the ordnance.

Offline Tomb

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 1
LANCASTER III
« Reply #59 on: August 10, 2000, 02:33:00 PM »
i have had an accident in my trousers
..and im drooling

hi kfsone long time no see

(where the hells my credit card i think i feel the need to fly this)

regards

Tomb