Author Topic: US bans guns  (Read 2353 times)

Offline Holden McGroin

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8591
US bans guns
« Reply #75 on: May 22, 2003, 01:17:41 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Toad
Especially when the basis for the thread is an article that has no foundation in fact.


Don't confuse him with facts...

Many good arguments to the Pongo contrary have been made with no avail.
Holden McGroin LLC makes every effort to provide accurate and complete information. Since humor, irony, and keen insight may be foreign to some readers, no warranty, expressed or implied is offered. Re-writing this disclaimer cost me big bucks at the lawyer’s office!

Offline Tumor

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4272
      • Wait For It
US bans guns
« Reply #76 on: May 22, 2003, 02:32:40 AM »
Ok... so who here thinks they can wander around downtown (anycity USA) with an AK-47 ... or an RPG and not get arrested?



Ok.. now who here doesn't think hundreds of foks wandering around most towns, usually belonging to one "tribe" or another and willing to blow away anyone from the "other tribe" wouldn't lead to complete banning of weapons in the U.S. at some point?

.... good grief Pongo.
"Dogfighting is useless"  :Erich Hartmann

Offline bigsky

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 964
US bans guns
« Reply #77 on: May 22, 2003, 02:42:13 AM »
let them have there guns, its not like the un has done them any favors. why should they start now
"I am moist like bacon"

Offline SOB

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10138
US bans guns
« Reply #78 on: May 22, 2003, 03:04:47 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Pongo
You just learn to spot the people on crack after a while. Its not worth discussing it with them.  Technicalities are worthless in this instance.


Heh, funny you should mention that...


SOB
Three Times One Minus One.  Dayum!

Offline lazs2

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 24886
US bans guns
« Reply #79 on: May 22, 2003, 08:48:19 AM »
one visual clue to who is on crack is that they tend to be leaning way over to the left.   If you bother to listen to em you will note also that they have a tendency to find "proof" of their paranoia from dusty little corners of the internet...  if they use legit sources they will most likely be misquoting or taking out of context... they can't follow anything past "proof" they are right.

They will also be gun nuts...  they will be nuts when it comes to guns..  they will know nothing about guns but still have a neurotic obsession with anything gun related.. an unreasonable fear based on.... nothing that they can put their finger on... they just "feel", they are....... nutty... gun nuts.
lazs

Offline Pongo

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6701
US bans guns
« Reply #80 on: May 23, 2003, 01:50:47 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Toad
Especially when the basis for the thread is an article that has no foundation in fact.


You mean like the weapons of mass destuction charge the war was based on?
But no matter.
How is that relevent for the detection of brainwashing? They believed it true and still made thier silly "not a valid comparison" arguments.

Offline lazs2

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 24886
US bans guns
« Reply #81 on: May 23, 2003, 08:39:03 AM »
not a valid comparisson is relevant... as is.... not a factual article.  You can't compare iraq with the U.S. it is even less like us than say canada.   I certainly wouldn't want the french speakers to have guns if we liberated canada.
lazs

Offline Toad

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 18415
US bans guns
« Reply #82 on: May 23, 2003, 09:36:51 AM »
C'mon Pongo. You've always been one of the more intelligent and well grounded posters in the O-Club. What the heck happened.

There's no discussing the link you posted because it isn't true.

Shall we discuss the abberant sex habits of Canadians if I can find an article somewhere that says every single male Canadian keeps a Vietnamese pot-bellied pig in a dog crate in his bedroom for use as a nightly sex slave?

BS is BS and your "source" was pure BS. There's no discussing that rationally.

The facts are that Iraq has just been militarily vanquished, there is an occupying army in place that has to provide security for it's own troops as well as the local populace. After WW2, the allied powers didn't allow the common citizens of the occupied countries to roam around openly with smg's and panzerfausts.

Further, the citizenry HAS been allowed to keep fully automatic weapons like AK-47's in their possession. They've just been told to keep them at home. Think on this.. occupying army, citizenry walking around in bands with AK's after Saddam Fedayeen dressed in civilian clothes have recently been in combat with Coalition troops.

Surely you can see the reason to keep the guns at home.

And, overall, the point is THEY STILL HAVE THEIR AK'S!

Even in the US, you can't have fully auto weapons without special background checks and investigations.

So what is there to discuss here? They have more rights than we do under the 2nd.
If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude than the animated contest of freedom, go from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains sit lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen!