Lets just say, for example, that if you tested 100 black students and 100 white students......that the white ones scored on average way higher than the black ones. Will a lib stand up and say the test was biased towards white students?
So if you tested one town's students versus another town's students (regardless of anything else, just geographical location) and one town scored way higher than the other..........would some stats geek stand up and say that town is stupider than this town? Or was that test biased as well?
The problem with these kinds of testing divisions is that if the test results actually show what most people think anyway then those that tell us what we should and shouldnt think will also tell us the test is all wrong and it shouldn't be like that. Maybe it's true, maybe (on average) black and hispanic students in Florida are actually slightly less intelligent than white students......or maybe all the white students who live in the same areas as those black and hispanic who scored low also scored low and those black and hispanics that live in the same areas as the white students that scored high also scored high?
Who knows? Doesn't matter cos the libs have stood up and said it's all wrong anyway.
Libs piss me off. Just
because someone is part of an ethnic minority doesn't mean they can't be of slightly lower intelligence.....or incidentally a small minded thieving little scumbag. It just means you shouldn't
assume they are
because they are part of an ethnic minority. shreckin libs.
