the glocks seem weird to me. while I know the grips are supposed to be ergonomically correct they just seem off. I imagine they would be great if you started off with one and didn't have to re-learn.
myself I started out on ruger revolvers and an old navy colt cap & ball. the thing that’s weird about the glock is the alignment between the grip and the barrel. while it might technically be an even better design than all the other guns I've used, the fact remains that it's just different. and in an emergancy I'd rather be able to know what to expect without having to think to much ablout the details.
I checked into buying one awhile ago and I never could get it to feel natural in my hand.
one test I do with a handgun to see how it feels is to just point it at something (without aiming) then hold your position and look down the sights and see how close you are.
I tried this with a glock (laser equipped), pointed it at a dartboard about 12' away, then turned on the laser, I was well over a foot off of where I thought I was aiming.
with any of my other guns I would expect to be no more than 6 inches off at that distance, allowing some of that for the gun moving while you move your head to look down the sights- I know hardly a scientific method - I would expect a more accurate representation with the laser sight since I don't have to change position at all just turn on the light.
with that considered I'd hate to have to use it in a high stress situation. IMO if you are going to use a gun for protection you should be able to hit a man size target @ under 30' with reasonable accuracy without much more effort than you'd use pointing your finger. I'd hate to have to line up sights while moving and somebody trying to kill me.
Give me a nice S&W auto any day, or if you got the cash you can't beat the browning hi-power.
if money is really no object or you think you will likely need to use it often in a life and death situation go for a sig