« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2   Go Down

Author Topic: Skuzzy or Dale  (Read 892 times)

Offline rod367th

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1320
Skuzzy or Dale
« on: July 10, 2003, 02:36:02 PM »
I've heard alot of complaints that fighting same map over and over for a week. Is very boring. If we voted on map rotation, would you change it?



 I was thinking map roatation like before,at end of war. but change on friday if large map is been up a week? so worst case would be large map 13 days at most? I myself find fighting same small map over and over boring fast atleast big map u may see different bases during next war.
Logged

Offline muckmaw

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3874
Skuzzy or Dale
« Reply #1 on: July 10, 2003, 02:44:41 PM »
Have to agree with Rod here.
Logged

Offline OverBkil

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 147
Skuzzy or Dale
« Reply #2 on: July 10, 2003, 02:51:25 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by muckmaw
Have to agree with Rod here.


Me too
Logged

Offline Zanth

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1052
      • http://www.a-26legacy.org/photo.htm
Skuzzy or Dale
« Reply #3 on: July 10, 2003, 03:07:25 PM »
Yes please!
Logged

Offline SlapShot

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9121
Skuzzy or Dale
« Reply #4 on: July 10, 2003, 03:09:28 PM »
Anything that will rotate us thru these small maps quicker so we can get to the REAL maps is just fine with me.
Logged
SlapShot - Blue Knights

Guppy: "The only risk we take is the fight, and since no one really dies, the reward is the fight."

Offline Joc

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 857
Skuzzy or Dale
« Reply #5 on: July 10, 2003, 03:15:32 PM »
Agree,lets go back to the old way,at least if we wanted a new map we had to fight hard to win one!
Logged
Joc

Offline Swoop

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9180
Skuzzy or Dale
« Reply #6 on: July 10, 2003, 03:17:21 PM »
One further point for anyone at HTC reading this:

The whole point of setting up the one-map-per-week idea in the first place was because we (the players) voiced concern over the length of time Trinity takes to reset.  Without a forced map change every friday we'll be stuck on Trinity for weeks every time it rolls round.

Ok.

So how about changing the setup slightly so that when a map is reset it changes to the next one.

If the same map has been up for a week then auto change it on friday.  That will take out the "Trinity effect".

Logged

Offline Tarmac

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3988
Skuzzy or Dale
« Reply #7 on: July 10, 2003, 03:19:59 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Swoop
 That will take out the "Trinity effect".
 


Does that have something to do with a mushroom cloud? :)

But for all it matters, I think swoop's idea is the best thing going.
Logged

Offline BGBMAW

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2288
Skuzzy or Dale
« Reply #8 on: July 10, 2003, 03:37:59 PM »
agree
Logged

Offline Grimm

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1015
Skuzzy or Dale
« Reply #9 on: July 10, 2003, 03:51:11 PM »
I like it the way it is...  :)

It hard for me to understand people getting tired of a Map staying up for a week.    Thats not a big deal to me.  

I think the way its done currently is the fairest way,  everyones favorite map is up for the same length of time, and its an equal amount of time before they come back.

Small Maps might only see a few hours up under the proposal suggested here.   The Big maps would be dominate.

Another plus with the current system,  You can actually pre-plan a squadnight based on the terrain type.   Thats kinda nice.

So,  I say its working well now...  its fair and enjoyable  :)
Logged

Offline Pongo

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6701
Skuzzy or Dale
« Reply #10 on: July 10, 2003, 04:29:06 PM »
yes Dont know how the decision to lock maps for a week was made or what efffect was hoped for. But some of these maps do not derserve a week of our time any more. Mandino was a good 250 -300 person map. It has real problems as a 450-550 person map.
Please the old reset rule was better. Or if there is no reset in a week then change maps arbitrarily.
Logged

Offline Horn

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1117
Skuzzy or Dale
« Reply #11 on: July 10, 2003, 04:30:57 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Swoop
One further point for anyone at HTC reading this:

The whole point of setting up the one-map-per-week idea in the first place was because we (the players) voiced concern over the length of time Trinity takes to reset.  Without a forced map change every friday we'll be stuck on Trinity for weeks every time it rolls round.

Ok.

So how about changing the setup slightly so that when a map is reset it changes to the next one.

If the same map has been up for a week then auto change it on friday.  That will take out the "Trinity effect".


Good suggestion! Hope they take notice. I disagree Grimm. The current situation is NOT enjoyable. YMMV.

h
Logged

Offline ccvi

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2074
      • http://www.carl-eike-hofmeister.de/
Skuzzy or Dale
« Reply #12 on: July 10, 2003, 06:36:42 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Swoop
So how about changing the setup slightly so that when a map is reset it changes to the next one.

If the same map has been up for a week then auto change it on friday.  That will take out the "Trinity effect".


This way we'll be playing the following maps per week:

5 ours on each of the small ones, rest of the week on either pizza or trinity.
Logged

Offline Manedew

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1080
Skuzzy or Dale
« Reply #13 on: July 10, 2003, 07:21:28 PM »
I liked it the old way ... i'd be up for a vote :)
Logged

Offline Saurdaukar

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8610
      • Army of Muppets
Skuzzy or Dale
« Reply #14 on: July 10, 2003, 07:27:03 PM »
Why does no one like the small maps?
Logged
Pages: [1] 2   Go Up
« previous next »