Author Topic: Heil Intolerance (Read 11775 times)

Toad · « **Reply #300 on:** August 04, 2003, 08:47:12 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by AVRO1
I know exactly what I am saying and you dont.

Exactly. That's what I've been trying to tell you. And I suspect I'm not the only one. But it's not because I can't read and comprehend the words and syntax you choose to use.

Frogm4n · « **Reply #301 on:** August 04, 2003, 09:33:50 PM »

if this thread gets to 500 sob, im gonna find some real good porn for ya.

and btw for that want to be gay guy that bash's gays. Almost all sexual offenders and child molestors are straight men.

and marines. SEMPER FI SEMPER FI!!

(okay not all marines)

SOB · « **Reply #302 on:** August 04, 2003, 10:06:21 PM »

It's not gonna be gay porn, is it?

SOB

Frogm4n · « **Reply #303 on:** August 04, 2003, 10:19:10 PM »

gay as in lesbians. then yes its gay porn.

SOB · « **Reply #304 on:** August 04, 2003, 10:25:23 PM »

Outstanding!

Mini D · « **Reply #305 on:** August 04, 2003, 10:45:12 PM »

No way it makes 500. Skuzzy will lock it before then. All these guys spraying testosterone all over the place... wew... just add 1000 gallons of baby oil and you'd have the makings for one of the best gay porn films ever made.

MiniD

Thrawn · « **Reply #306 on:** August 04, 2003, 11:22:21 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Toad
Bigotry IS intolerance. Intolerance IS bigotry, MT.

Ouroboros.

No it isn't. It doesn't matter if you call it intolerance or bigotry.

Fine, intolerance of intolerance is intolerance. It's not germaine to the discussion. The thing that matters is what the intolerance is intolerant of.

MT: You shouldn't be intolerant of gays.

T: Are you intolerant of Saddam Hussein?

MT: Yes.

T: Hypocrit! All intolerances are the same thing.

The above argruement is really a strawmen, that bypass are the supporting reasons that MT might have to explain why one should tolerate gays. Then again, maybe Toad is just having fun.

mietla · « **Reply #307 on:** August 04, 2003, 11:30:15 PM »

184 to go... er... 183

Toad · « **Reply #308 on:** August 05, 2003, 07:33:52 AM »

Here SOB, I'll help ya out.......

Thrawn, there's guys on both sides of this argument totally intolerant of someone else's right to hold a differing viewpoint.

And there is the basic underlying problem.

Fatty · « **Reply #309 on:** August 05, 2003, 07:53:47 AM »

After review of our dogma, my religion has updated its view on this subject.

Marriage of attractive bisexual women be allowed, and polygamy in these relationships should be encouraged.

Marraige of gay men should be allowed but monogamous, with the death penalty for adultry.

Animal husbandry should be allowed, but only if they tap their hoof twice indicating consent.

The wedding of corpses should be allowed but only with consent in the will of the deceased.

Curval · « **Reply #310 on:** August 05, 2003, 07:56:55 AM »

Toad...I'm hoping that you aren't referring to me bud.

Hell, I'm even going to read the bible to try and see what drives Rude....I just haven't been able to dig one up yet

(actually I haven't looked YET, but I will).

I have no problem with other people's view points, but where I think they are wrong I will use my freedom of speech to say so. I will also use the same right to ignore those who sit back and act like they are arm-chair psychologists asking all kinds of irrelevant questions as if to say "And how does that make you feel?" in an effort to garnish information to be used as ammunition later and who blatantly ignores any counter points made.

I also apprecaite INDIVIDUAL opinions...not parrots who see the world through a narrow "key hole" and who refuse to entertain anything that isn't what they percieve to be normal or moral. Should they choose not to...fine. I will not hold it against them personally.

Fatty · « **Reply #311 on:** August 05, 2003, 07:58:39 AM »

What's wrong with looking thru keyholes? Who are you to judge me?

Ripsnort · « **Reply #312 on:** August 05, 2003, 08:00:19 AM »

May I please interrupt this pathetic squabbling for a moment?

Fatty>>>
http://www.hitechcreations.com/forums/showthread.php?threadid=93060&referrerid=3203

Curval · « **Reply #313 on:** August 05, 2003, 08:06:48 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by Fatty
What's wrong with looking thru keyholes? Who are you to judge me?

lol...

I have a sneaking suspicion that I would be peering through many of the same keyholes as you Fatty.

midnight Target · « **Reply #314 on:** August 05, 2003, 12:06:27 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Toad
Here SOB, I'll help ya out.......

Thrawn, there's guys on both sides of this argument totally intolerant of someone else's right to hold a differing viewpoint.

And there is the basic underlying problem.

Toad, this is just sillyness.

People can FEEL however they want to FEEL about gays and the rights they should have. I am full of tolerance for those people and their poor misguided views.

But when someone advocates that anyone should be TREATED with less respect or have fewer rights, then intolerance is the only response that is appropriate.

on to 500.......