Again, we have one case, of Franken seeking to obtain something on a false pretense, then coming to his senses and sending out a letter of apology. And none of this material appears in his book.
Yet the attempt is to say that "well, he almost obtained information in a backhanded manner, but decided that it was wrong to do so, and so the information he did publish is certainly false".
uh...
This editorial based on the smoking gun is just the kind of reactionary tripe that will get people to buy his book: someone from the right writing a smear piece about a non-starter of a controversy.
What's worse is that, if someone wanted to get off their fat pork-bellied tulips and do a real investigative smear job, they could probably find out the circumstances surrounding Franken's second letter, and if anyone put him up to it.
It's a half-assed character assassination, which makes one wonder about the intelligence of the right in this country.