Author Topic: Beet1e, you got some 'splaining to do (lucy)  (Read 2549 times)

Offline beet1e

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7848
Beet1e, you got some 'splaining to do (lucy)
« Reply #30 on: October 07, 2003, 04:28:55 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Yeager
I would much rather have a gun and live in fear than NOT have a gun and live in fear :D
I don't have a gun, and I don't live in fear. :D

Offline drone

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 114
Beet1e, you got some 'splaining to do (lucy)
« Reply #31 on: October 07, 2003, 04:33:47 AM »
amount of children killed in the US every year from accidental weapons discharge -------30

amount of children killed by a bucket of water in the US every year---35

lets ban buckets or at least control and register users of said weapons....

statistics are all in how you use them.....


BTW beetle----Britains gun control laws have been in affect since guns were invented----hell even the Bobbys didnt carry them until recently......And the reason for your gun control isnt because of crime --they were because your kings (and queens) were afraid that the common people might decide to go the way of the "colonies" and get rid of them.....

Gun control in the states is an issue today because politicaly powerful know that americans dont feel to bad about getting up the arms to straighten out the government......its not about crime ------it scares the crap out of the authorties to have an honest bright-minded people to have the ability to shoot stupid people IE: criminals, polititions, liberals and democrats.........
« Last Edit: October 07, 2003, 04:45:40 AM by drone »

Offline -dead-

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1102
Beet1e, you got some 'splaining to do (lucy)
« Reply #32 on: October 07, 2003, 05:32:21 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Yeager
I would much rather have a gun and live in fear than NOT have a gun and live in fear :D
If you think you need a gun to protect yourself, you already are living in fear.
« Last Edit: October 07, 2003, 12:12:01 PM by -dead- »
“The FBI has no hard evidence connecting Usama Bin Laden to 9/11.” --  Rex Tomb, Chief of Investigative Publicity for the FBI, June 5, 2006.

Offline Momus--

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 651
Beet1e, you got some 'splaining to do (lucy)
« Reply #33 on: October 07, 2003, 05:57:53 AM »
"Gun crimes in UK are up 50% since the gun laws were tightened, that in itself is yet another demonstration that gun laws don't deter criminals, they just disarm the law-abiding public"

So you're arguing that a few thousand pistol enthusiasts were somehow holding back a crimewave prior to the handgun ban? Despite the fact that concealed carry was never legal? Despite the fact that the majority of handgun owners didn't keep their weapons at home?

Has gun crime gone up since the handgun ban? Yes. Did gun crime go up because of the handgun ban? No. Can't you see the difference? :rolleyes:

Offline Nashwan

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1864
Beet1e, you got some 'splaining to do (lucy)
« Reply #34 on: October 07, 2003, 06:11:34 AM »
Quote
BTW beetle----Britains gun control laws have been in affect since guns were invented


Gun ownership was unregulated until just after WW 1.

Quote
hell even the Bobbys didnt carry them until recently

Until the 20s or 30s, it was up to an individual policeman if he wanted to buy and carry a gun, some did, the vast majority didn't bother.

Quote
And the reason for your gun control isnt because of crime --they were because your kings (and queens) were afraid that the common people might decide to go the way of the "colonies" and get rid of them


No, the government were afraid of a communist takeover in the wake of WW1 and the Russian revolution. The government, who make the laws, not the Kings and Queens, who have no political power.

Quote
If gun crime had gone down after the new gun restrictions, then gun laws could be credited with the UK's low gun crime rate.


Gun crime did go down after the new laws. Britain's gun crime is now "the highest since 1993"

Quote
you can live in england and think your safe, i will live in the land of the free, carry a gun and know i'm safe.

Where you have about 5 times the chance of being murdered.

Are American policemen safe? They all carry guns to protect them, and many wear body armour as well. 70 were shot dead on duty last year. Very safe.

Quote
Replicant, In states that have right to cary laws there are less shootings than states that don't allow it.


Could it be that states that allow concealed carry are mainly rural, whilst states that don't are mainly urban? And all over the world, urban areas have higher crime rates.
« Last Edit: October 07, 2003, 06:16:41 AM by Nashwan »

Offline drone

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 114
Beet1e, you got some 'splaining to do (lucy)
« Reply #35 on: October 07, 2003, 06:29:46 AM »
nope shotguns and hunting rifles have always been the mainstay of the people...pistols were not a common weapon. Even these were not incuraged for getting permission to hunt on a lords property was extremely hard for a "serf".  The British population had been trained as a "common" army from the longbow days, firearms were not allowed to be kept by the average joe.

US police followed the british form of not carrying pistols UNTIL the 20's and 30's then crime got so bad they had to arm themselves in the eastern urban area's, mainly newyork city. I'm not talking about sherrifs and marshals and those forms of law-inforcement. Police=peacekeepers, not law-inforcers.

Wasnt the communist they were afraid of lol...
The US had its own communist "problem" though it was handled badly (IMO) disarming the population certainly wasnt an answer.

Offline GRUNHERZ

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 13413
Beet1e, you got some 'splaining to do (lucy)
« Reply #36 on: October 07, 2003, 06:37:50 AM »
But, but you guys banned handguns - surely making them illegal would have solved these problems...

What are these people who still have handguns in the UK thinking?  Good lord,  what are they criminals or something?


BTW is it true the British olympic (iirc) handgun shooting team was forced to practice outside the UK aftyer the handgun ban...

GUN CRIMES UP 35% in ONE YEAR!    :p

Offline ra

  • Parolee
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3569
Beet1e, you got some 'splaining to do (lucy)
« Reply #37 on: October 07, 2003, 07:03:39 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Momus--
"Gun crimes in UK are up 50% since the gun laws were tightened, that in itself is yet another demonstration that gun laws don't deter criminals, they just disarm the law-abiding public"

So you're arguing that a few thousand pistol enthusiasts were somehow holding back a crimewave prior to the handgun ban? Despite the fact that concealed carry was never legal? Despite the fact that the majority of handgun owners didn't keep their weapons at home?

Has gun crime gone up since the handgun ban? Yes. Did gun crime go up because of the handgun ban? No. Can't you see the difference? :rolleyes:

Can you see that the handgun ban did not prevent gun crimes from going up 50%?  

Anyway, you should feel very safe in knowing that law abiding citizens will never again be allowed to own handguns.

ra

Offline Toad

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 18415
Beet1e, you got some 'splaining to do (lucy)
« Reply #38 on: October 07, 2003, 08:25:19 AM »
What are the latest "sharp instrument" numbers?
If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude than the animated contest of freedom, go from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains sit lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen!

Offline lazs2

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 24886
Beet1e, you got some 'splaining to do (lucy)
« Reply #39 on: October 07, 2003, 08:26:09 AM »
They are going about the gun control issue all wrong in england...

The guns causing the problem are HANDGUNS   notice the word "hand" is first.... take away everyones hands and you will solve the handgun problem.
lazs

Offline Curval

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 11572
      • http://n/a
Beet1e, you got some 'splaining to do (lucy)
« Reply #40 on: October 07, 2003, 08:34:50 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by CyranoAH
I prefer living in a country with strict gun laws.

No gun laws = easier for a nut to get a deadly weapon
Gun Laws = only resourceful criminals get one. Ratio of resourceful criminals / Police Forces is quite balanced.

That's enough for me.

Daniel


Amen.
Some will fall in love with life and drink it from a fountain that is pouring like an avalanche coming down the mountain

Offline lazs2

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 24886
Beet1e, you got some 'splaining to do (lucy)
« Reply #41 on: October 07, 2003, 08:37:57 AM »
God did not create man equal.... Colonel Colt did.    In America we believe that.   it works for us.   Burglars don't rob houses with people in em here.  

Concealed carry gun owners don't "heat of the the moment" shoot people... they don't commit crimes of any sort... they are 100 times more law abiding than the average citizen actually.

More third worlders in your country means you won't be able to pretend that you are safe with your "gun control laws" that never solved anything in the first place... You want to keep living the lie than keep out the third worlders.   Canada can really be smug and hypocritical since they have a nation that is far richer than theirs on their border.... Australia is isolated and Japan and england are friggin tiny little islands.

but... it's gonna get worse... the have nots are looking you guys over.
lazs

Offline Dune

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1727
      • http://www.352ndfightergroup.com/
Re: Ripsnort's interpretation of how laws work.
« Reply #42 on: October 07, 2003, 09:01:32 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by beet1e
On motoring: Driving too fast is dangerous... many abide by the speed limits, but some do not. Therefore, "speed limits don't work". Ripsnort's solution - abolish speed limits so that no law is being broken. :rolleyes:[/url]


But the method you want to use is: Driving too fast is dangerous. ...many abide by the speed limits, but some do not.  Therefore the present limits do not work.  So we'll keep adding limits until we take away your cars.  And, by the way, the only ones who'll have to give them up are the ones who weren't speeding in the first place.

Momus:
You just made my/our point.  You took guns away from those who legally enjoyed shooting sports.  But crime still went up.  So all you've done is kept law-abiding citizens from having weapons, for whatever purpose.  No, those people probably weren't holding back crime, but they weren't causing it either.  Yet they are the ones who've born the punishment for someone else's crimes.

To all:
I have several weapons.  I have a permit to carry them concealed.  I live in the 5th largest city in the US (Phoenix)  We have a decent crime rate, largely due to illegal aliens from Mexico and the drug trade.  I do not live in fear.  I do no own guns because of fear.

There is always going to be a basic point where most Europeans do not understand the way Americans feel.  And that's because we feel it's our right to keep and bear arms.  It is not something given to us by the government that can be taken away by our government.  Just as our government can't take away our right to free speech or religion or voting.  That right can be limited, there's already over 20,000 federal, state and local laws controlling firearms in the US, but it can't be destroyed.

A few facts to leave with you:
At the same time the crime rate and the overall murder rate has reached a 22-year low, privately owned firearms increased in the U.S. by an average of 5.3 million per year during the 1990s. (BATF)

Privately owned firearms in the U.S.: Well over 200 million, including 65-70 million handguns

Gun owners in the U.S.: 60-65 million; 30-35 million own handguns

American households that have firearms: Approx. 45%

Hunters nationwide: 14 million (16 yrs. of age and older)

I wont argue with you, just ask you to look at the numbers. There are more guns in the US than ever before and the crime numbers, across the board, are going down. Yet in places like England and Australia, which confiscated a vast majority of private owned firearms, the crime rates have gone up.

To me that means that guns aren't the problem.  Yet the response is to say, "Take them away from law-abiding citizens!".

Then we show you that in countries such as Australia and England, the number of crimes comitted with guns has gone up since guns were widely outlawed.

So, let's take a look at this. We've shown that more guns do not equal more crime. And we've shown that taking guns away from law-abiding citizens does not equal less crime (in fact, it seems to equal more).

But it's so much easier to point at a gun and scream "There's the problem!!!". Because otherwise, you might have to look at the person holding it. And then you might have to do the hard job of figuring out why he's holding it and why he's thinking of using it. And that reflects on society as a whole. Which can be uncomfortable.

So once again, you cry for us to strike at the symptom, not the disease. And, like giving make-up to someone suffering from cancer, the problem may look better but it's still killing you.

Guns are not the problem, criminals are the problem. Because they will get guns or some other weapon if they need it. Reduce crime and reduce gun crime.

And with that, I bow out of this thread. The numbers are there that show gun control is a lie told to the people by the politicians because it's easier to attack them than fix our society.

There are people who don't see because they can't. Then there are people who don't see because they wont.

Offline Rude

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4609
Beet1e, you got some 'splaining to do (lucy)
« Reply #43 on: October 07, 2003, 09:05:58 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by vorticon
im not sure why you gun nuts are worried about gun control laws...you all use them perfectly legally so you have nothing to hide or fear...so what if it takes you a few extra days to get it

oh and those having nothing to do with gun laws...some idiot got them legally then altered them illegally...so the system aint perfect WHAA WHAA WHAA

number of gun related crimes in uk / number of people

number of gun related crimes in us / number of people


look at the figures (i dont have them..sorry) THEN decide


This coming from a country which is taking it's citizens guns from them....that will help, the criminals I mean.

Offline Curval

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 11572
      • http://n/a
Beet1e, you got some 'splaining to do (lucy)
« Reply #44 on: October 07, 2003, 09:07:33 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by lazs2
God did not create man equal.... Colonel Colt did.    In America we believe that.   it works for us.   Burglars don't rob houses with people in em here.  

Concealed carry gun owners don't "heat of the the moment" shoot people... they don't commit crimes of any sort... they are 100 times more law abiding than the average citizen actually.

More third worlders in your country means you won't be able to pretend that you are safe with your "gun control laws" that never solved anything in the first place... You want to keep living the lie than keep out the third worlders.   Canada can really be smug and hypocritical since they have a nation that is far richer than theirs on their border.... Australia is isolated and Japan and england are friggin tiny little islands.

but... it's gonna get worse... the have nots are looking you guys over.
lazs


Paranoia served with a "hint" of xenophobia.

I suggest a Mosel or possibly a Burgundy to go with that.

;)
Some will fall in love with life and drink it from a fountain that is pouring like an avalanche coming down the mountain