Aces High Bulletin Board

General Forums => Wishlist => Topic started by: dirtdart on January 26, 2012, 07:16:38 AM

Title: The Space Battleship Yamato and supporting fighters
Post by: dirtdart on January 26, 2012, 07:16:38 AM
My wish is for the Space Battleship Yamato with veritech fighters.

Specs:  

General characteristics
Class   Yamato class battleship
Registry   None
Maximum speed   50 Space Knots
Fighters   Cosmo Tigers, Cosmo Zero, Cosmo Pulsar, Cosmo Pulsar Bomber
Auxiliary craft   Hospital and Medical shuttles
Armaments   
6 Barrel Wave Motion Gun
Shock cannons
Pulse lasers
Missile silos
Defenses   
Reflective shield
Bubble shield
Missle barrier shields
Propulsion   Wave Motion Engine
Mass   62,000t
Length   285.8m
Width   34.6m
Height   77.0m

(http://a6.sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-ash4/404451_10150531985877949_700532948_9123198_2034035472_n.jpg)

It could augment the proposed Nuke with planet destroying capability.  Once the nukes are used, the Battleship could be called out by the losing country at the cost of the net of all players on that side's perks.  The wave motion gun can be fired only once, per up.  It could be rearmed future additions to the game like a space port.  

Also, it could be modified to carry veritech fighters.  Which saw extensive service in our interstellar battles.  

(http://a5.sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-ash4/430543_10150531992577949_700532948_9123245_1883726843_n.jpg)

Specs:


General characteristics
Maximum speed   Mach 2.71 at 10,000 m
Mach 3.87 at 30,000+ m
Armaments   External GU-11 55 mm gunpod
1–4 Mauler RÖV-20 anti-aircraft laser cannons
Four pivoting hardpoints under the wings
Propulsion   2x Shinnakasu Heavy Industry/P&W/Roice FF-2001 thermonuclear reaction turbine engines[1]
Power   11,500 kgf /650 MW each
Mass   13,250 kg (empty)
Length   14.23 m (fighter mode)
11.3 m (GERWALK mode)
4 m (battroid mode)
Width   14.78 m (fully extended)
8.25 m (swept)
7.3 m (battroid mode)
Height   3.84 m (fighter mode)
8.7 m (GERWALK mode)
12.68 m (battroid mode)

I think these could help answer the problem of the KT.  It would be real hard for the KT to move its turret fast enough to track and fire on one in Battroid mode.  

I really thing this is a creative idea and one that certainly has never made it to the boards.  Thoughts?  
Title: Re: The Space Battleship Yamato and supporting fighters
Post by: FLS on January 26, 2012, 07:23:16 AM
I believe it was deployed after 1945.
Title: Re: The Space Battleship Yamato and supporting fighters
Post by: dirtdart on January 26, 2012, 07:27:21 AM
Dammit, I missed that, good catch FLS.  I guess then, without computer technology then, it would have been near impossible to convert from flight to guardian mode without spinning out of control.  Shucks. 
Title: Re: The Space Battleship Yamato and supporting fighters
Post by: mthrockmor on January 26, 2012, 08:00:21 AM
Holy crap! I remember that cartoon from way back when, must have been 1980 or so. Not sure what the story line was but every episode they would engage an enemy space battleship and launch their fighters for a sweep or Alpha Raid. The fighters were a cross of the F-16 and the X-wing fighter.

Awesome! Brings back memories of getting up early to watch just before the bus came for school. I think early Japanese animation as the lip-sync was pretty bad into English. If you have a link to an online episode or something please send.

Boo
Title: Re: The Space Battleship Yamato and supporting fighters
Post by: FLOTSOM on January 26, 2012, 08:07:19 AM
that was always one of my favorite cartoons!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

+1:aok
Title: Re: The Space Battleship Yamato and supporting fighters
Post by: SmokinLoon on January 26, 2012, 08:11:29 AM
I was thinking circa 1977-1980 myself.  What a great cartoon.  They've recently updated the cartoon w/ new graphics, etc, and iirc even made a movie about it.  What a classis cartoon and storyline.

Too bad %99.9 of the Japanese have no clue what the real Yamato was, in fact %99.9 have no clue what happened between Dec 7, 1941 and Aug 6-9, 1945.  Seriously.
Title: Re: The Space Battleship Yamato and supporting fighters
Post by: AKP on January 26, 2012, 08:26:28 AM
If you have a link to an online episode or something please send.

Boo

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gVAtfbEUTko

A lot of them are on Youtube...

They also did a live action version last year.  I used to have a link to the full movie - english subtitled version, but its gone now.  This is a clip in japanese though:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6fQoh6AIgNE

I watched the whole movie with english subs... was pretty good :)

Title: Re: The Space Battleship Yamato and supporting fighters
Post by: mthrockmor on January 26, 2012, 09:18:54 AM
Thanks...pretty serious Cold War theme to this. Had no idea, but I was a kid. Reminds me of Reagan wishing there was an out of world threat that would unite the world against a common foe, instead of battling each other. He only said it once. Maybe it was a promo for this?

Boo
Title: Re: The Space Battleship Yamato and supporting fighters
Post by: MAINER on January 26, 2012, 09:54:21 AM
did it see squadron strength?  :rofl :rofl :rofl
Title: Re: The Space Battleship Yamato and supporting fighters
Post by: bortas1 on January 26, 2012, 10:55:05 AM
 :salute i have never seen that show, but have heard of it. robotech i enjoyed alot. my little brother and me watched it when it was on.  :aok
Title: Re: The Space Battleship Yamato and supporting fighters
Post by: Soulyss on January 26, 2012, 10:56:28 AM
Finally! A reasonable wishlist request!

+1

:D

Title: Re: The Space Battleship Yamato and supporting fighters
Post by: Butcher on January 26, 2012, 10:59:35 AM
(http://static.zoovy.com/img/toynk/W650-H437-Bffffff/CDE_15028_Cc.jpg)

I would like to see an Advanced Tie Fighter added to the game to spend my perks on, here are some spec's

Production information
Manufacturer   
Sienar Fleet Systems
Product line   
TIE series
Model   
Twin Ion Engine Advanced x1
Class   
Starfighter
Technical specifications
Length   
9.2 meters[1]
Maximum acceleration   
4,150 G
MGLT   
105 MGLT[1]
Maximum speed (atmosphere)   
1,200 km/h[1]
Engine unit(s)   
SFS P-s5.6 twin ion engines (2)[2]
Hyperdrive rating   
Class 4.0[1]
Power plant   
SFS I-S3A solar ionization reactor[2]
Shielding   
Equipped
Hull   
Reinforced durasteel alloy
Navigation system   
Equipped, 10 jump limit[2]
Armament   
L-s9.3 laser cannons (2)[3]
Crew   
Pilot (1)[3]
Passengers   
None
Cargo capacity   
150 kilograms[1]
Consumables   
5 days[3]
Usage
Role(s)   
Space superiority fighter
Era(s)   
Rise of the Empire era
Rebellion era
New Republic era
New Jedi Order era
Affiliation   
Galactic Empire
Imperial Remnant

It was in production and flew, it comes with 2 lasers, (stolen from 999,000's B-17) its quite fast and seen combat in squadron strength for the empire.
Title: Re: The Space Battleship Yamato and supporting fighters
Post by: FLS on January 26, 2012, 11:00:38 AM
did it see squadron strength?  :rofl :rofl :rofl

Now you're being silly. Battleships don't fly through space in squadrons.
Title: Re: The Space Battleship Yamato and supporting fighters
Post by: Drano on January 26, 2012, 11:28:26 AM
Was also known as "Starblazers". Loved that one. Those pesky Gamelons would think they had the drop on the Yamato and then she'd whip out a can of wave motion gun on their bedonkadonks! Yeah! Say hello to my little friend!
Title: Re: The Space Battleship Yamato and supporting fighters
Post by: davidwales on January 26, 2012, 11:29:20 AM
you dont fly ships you fry chips  :airplane:
Title: Re: The Space Battleship Yamato and supporting fighters
Post by: DaCoon on January 26, 2012, 11:38:17 AM
you dont fly ships you fry chips  :airplane:

   :huh
Title: Re: The Space Battleship Yamato and supporting fighters
Post by: Pigslilspaz on January 26, 2012, 11:40:53 AM
(http://static.zoovy.com/img/toynk/W650-H437-Bffffff/CDE_15028_Cc.jpg)

I would like to see an Advanced Tie Fighter added to the game to spend my perks on, here are some spec's


It was in production and flew, it comes with 2 lasers, (stolen from 999,000's B-17) its quite fast and seen combat in squadron strength for the empire.

Did not see squadron strength. It is Darth Vader's TIE Advanced x1, which was prototype that never saw production, and had only 1 built. It did however lead to the development of the TIE Avenger.
Title: Re: The Space Battleship Yamato and supporting fighters
Post by: dirtdart on January 26, 2012, 12:36:45 PM
you dont fly ships you fry chips  :airplane:

This thread was started as a thinly veiled attempt to stop the madness on some recent requests. 

Back on point however,

If you were to get the veritech fights, that is attributed to the Macross, so, should the SDF Macross be brought into the game instead of the Yamato. 

FLS, thinking a bit more into it, yes, the Yamato saw service in WWII, any mods that took place afterword...eh (shrugs shoulders).
Title: Re: The Space Battleship Yamato and supporting fighters
Post by: 4Prop on January 26, 2012, 01:09:06 PM
you dont fly ships you fry chips  :airplane:

<face palm>
Title: Re: The Space Battleship Yamato and supporting fighters
Post by: Wiley on January 26, 2012, 01:10:48 PM
FLS, thinking a bit more into it, yes, the Yamato saw service in WWII, any mods that took place afterword...eh (shrugs shoulders).

*snrk*  I'd like to see it added too.  I feel it would bring a lot to the game.

Wiley.
Title: Re: The Space Battleship Yamato and supporting fighters
Post by: MAINER on January 26, 2012, 02:53:02 PM
Now you're being silly. Battleships don't fly through space in squadrons.

just doing my job  :D
Title: Re: The Space Battleship Yamato and supporting fighters
Post by: AKP on January 26, 2012, 03:01:39 PM
If we are talking spaceships here...

TCS Tiger's Claw CV-07

Quote
The TCS Tiger's Claw was commissioned in 2644. The first of the Bengal class carriers, the ship was ten meters longer than subsequent Bengals – the design was streamlined and improved upon for later ships.

“The Claw”, as she was affectionately called by her crew, was home to many of the most famous pilots of the Kilrathi War. Christopher "Maverick" Blair, Todd "Maniac" Marshall, and Michael "Iceman" Casey all served with distinction aboard the carrier in 2655. Senator Taggart even served on her immediately before his retirement from the Space Forces. The ship was also home to the infamous; Commodore Geoffrey Tolwyn commanded the vessel in 2654, before being promoted to Admiral.

The end of the Tiger's Claw's service came in 2656, when it was ambushed by Kilrathi cloaking fighters while en-route to the Kilrathi Enigma sector Headquarters at K'tithrak Mang.

(http://www.wcnews.com/shots/movie/full/danfx6.jpg)

Title: Re: The Space Battleship Yamato and supporting fighters
Post by: Butcher on January 26, 2012, 04:07:26 PM
Did not see squadron strength. It is Darth Vader's TIE Advanced x1, which was prototype that never saw production, and had only 1 built. It did however lead to the development of the TIE Avenger.


My only response to someone who would know that...

(http://www.demotivationalposters.org/image/demotivational-poster/small/1004/arguing-on-the-internet-nerds-demotivational-poster-1271429492.jpg)
Title: Re: The Space Battleship Yamato and supporting fighters
Post by: USRanger on January 26, 2012, 04:10:17 PM
Robotech and Star Blazers, my two favorite cartoons of all time. :aok
Title: Re: The Space Battleship Yamato and supporting fighters
Post by: davidwales on January 26, 2012, 04:36:08 PM
well guys you have given me a brain wave here , since you have posted this thread ive been doing some research , it is regarding the bell , which was a german secret weapon , some say adolf hitler took off in it , just after he left the bunker in berlin , it was a flying saucer , that was situated in the black forest , and the launch plaform is still there , it was a highley magnetic circle , which could push a aircraft into another dimension via a wormhole , as soon as i got all the spec on it, ill put all the details here  :salute
Title: Re: The Space Battleship Yamato and supporting fighters
Post by: zippo on January 26, 2012, 04:46:28 PM

Too bad %99.9 of the Japanese have no clue what the real Yamato was, in fact %99.9 have no clue what happened between Dec 7, 1941 and Aug 6-9, 1945.  Seriously.

  Was wondering about this.  I read somewhere that the Japanese history books had left out a lot of things that happened in the 1930's and 1940's.  Anyone know where to get an English translation of a Japanese history book?
  I recently re-read 'Flags of Our Fathers'.  The movie version was quite different from the book.  Anyway, it got me to thinking about the history thing.

  Sorry is off this serious topic.
Title: Re: The Space Battleship Yamato and supporting fighters
Post by: AirLynx on January 26, 2012, 05:00:45 PM
<face palm>
We need this face!
Title: Re: The Space Battleship Yamato and supporting fighters
Post by: Wiley on January 26, 2012, 05:05:15 PM
Did not see squadron strength. It is Darth Vader's TIE Advanced x1, which was prototype that never saw production, and had only 1 built. It did however lead to the development of the TIE Avenger.


It's been a while since I served in the Empire and I don't keep up with the Veterans' association like I should, but wasn't the design that branched out of that prototype the 'TIE Advanced'?  Perhaps they changed the designation for it a la the A-10 going from being the Warthog to the Thunderbolt...

Wiley.
Title: Re: The Space Battleship Yamato and supporting fighters
Post by: Vadjan-Sama on January 26, 2012, 05:21:02 PM
+1 on the Yamato, we need more Japanese ships here

Im not really on the US planes but ok, what Varitech? im in for the VF-1S with the superpack to hunt down pickers/high monkeys:

General characteristics
Maximum speed    Mach 2.71 at 10,000 m
Mach 3.87 at 30,000+ m
Armaments    External GU-11 55 mm gunpod
1–4 Mauler RÖV-20 anti-aircraft laser cannons
Four pivoting hardpoints under the wings
Propulsion    2x Shinnakasu Heavy Industry/P&W/Roice FF-2001 thermonuclear reaction turbine engines[1]
Power    11,500 kgf /650 MW each
Mass    13,250 kg (empty)
Length    14.23 m (fighter mode)
11.3 m (GERWALK mode)
4 m (battroid mode)
Width    14.78 m (fully extended)
8.25 m (swept)
7.3 m (battroid mode)
Height    3.84 m (fighter mode)
8.7 m (GERWALK mode)
12.68 m (battroid mode)


(http://www.macross2.net/m3/forfansonly/vf-1s-dualstrike/fanon-vf-1s-dualstrike-hikaru-fighter.gif)

It saw action from the start of the war to the end so it can be added  :rock
Title: Re: The Space Battleship Yamato and supporting fighters
Post by: Vadjan-Sama on January 26, 2012, 05:28:15 PM
well guys you have given me a brain wave here , since you have posted this thread ive been doing some research , it is regarding the bell , which was a german secret weapon , some say adolf hitler took off in it , just after he left the bunker in berlin , it was a flying saucer , that was situated in the black forest , and the launch plaform is still there , it was a highley magnetic circle , which could push a aircraft into another dimension via a wormhole , as soon as i got all the spec on it, ill put all the details here  :salute

(http://www.cephirocorp.x10.mx/Vadjan/unlimitedfacepalm.jpg)
Title: Re: The Space Battleship Yamato and supporting fighters
Post by: Babalonian on January 26, 2012, 05:49:32 PM
The Claw mothership is in need of a graphics update!  +1
Title: Re: The Space Battleship Yamato and supporting fighters
Post by: RTHolmes on January 26, 2012, 05:56:32 PM
(http://www.cephirocorp.x10.mx/Vadjan/unlimitedfacepalm.jpg)

 :rofl
Title: Re: The Space Battleship Yamato and supporting fighters
Post by: lengro on January 26, 2012, 06:02:44 PM
Was a good day - way back - when Hitech forgot to disable the A51 hangar  :)

(http://i231.photobucket.com/albums/ee35/lengro/tie-fighter.jpg)
Title: Re: The Space Battleship Yamato and supporting fighters
Post by: SmokinLoon on January 26, 2012, 07:16:20 PM
 Was wondering about this.  I read somewhere that the Japanese history books had left out a lot of things that happened in the 1930's and 1940's.  Anyone know where to get an English translation of a Japanese history book?
  I recently re-read 'Flags of Our Fathers'.  The movie version was quite different from the book.  Anyway, it got me to thinking about the history thing.

  Sorry is off this serious topic.

One of my history profs in college taught English in Japan for a few years and married a Japanese woman.  He stated multiple times in both history and poli-sci classes that the Japanese make no mention of anything between the dates of Pearl Harbor and the dropping of the bombs.  None.  All the Japanese text books mention is "combat" at Pearl Harbor, then a quite lengthy section on the atom bombs.  The text books portray the history as if the Japanese were the victims of warfare.  No mention of the campaigns in Manchuria/Korea/mainland Asia, the Bataan Death March, Wake Island, Kamikazes, or WWII in general.

In contrast, the Germans evidently study up on Hitler, the Brown Shirts, National Socialism, etc etc, and are taught all the bad things associated with them.     
Title: Re: The Space Battleship Yamato and supporting fighters
Post by: dirtdart on January 27, 2012, 05:55:14 AM
+1 on the Yamato, we need more Japanese ships here

Im not really on the US planes but ok, what Varitech? im in for the VF-1S with the superpack to hunt down pickers/high monkeys:

General characteristics
Maximum speed    Mach 2.71 at 10,000 m
Mach 3.87 at 30,000+ m
Armaments    External GU-11 55 mm gunpod
1–4 Mauler RÖV-20 anti-aircraft laser cannons
Four pivoting hardpoints under the wings
Propulsion    2x Shinnakasu Heavy Industry/P&W/Roice FF-2001 thermonuclear reaction turbine engines[1]
Power    11,500 kgf /650 MW each
Mass    13,250 kg (empty)
Length    14.23 m (fighter mode)
11.3 m (GERWALK mode)
4 m (battroid mode)
Width    14.78 m (fully extended)
8.25 m (swept)
7.3 m (battroid mode)
Height    3.84 m (fighter mode)
8.7 m (GERWALK mode)
12.68 m (battroid mode)


(http://www.macross2.net/m3/forfansonly/vf-1s-dualstrike/fanon-vf-1s-dualstrike-hikaru-fighter.gif)

It saw action from the start of the war to the end so it can be added  :rock

This also became the transformer "jet fire" if you recall. I still have a plastic one somewhere in a box. I would trade a kid for the metal toy of this.... Lol only the rich kids had it back in the day.

Ranger... Both robotech and starazers are/were on Netflix. I used to love how the Yamato would always be on the verge of disaster until they fired the wave motion gun. The climatic music as the system charged.... Will the charge in time or is the Yamato goin down ......  Lol.



Title: Re: The Space Battleship Yamato and supporting fighters
Post by: davidwales on January 27, 2012, 06:25:32 AM
ok ok i get the point , i wont waste any more time trying to improve gameplay , seems all you who read the bb are tared with the same brush apart from a few positive players who are very impartial and only want fair play ,

some of the best readers of this forum are

evz              guncrasher           mano


rob                debrody              chilli

tec                grumpy               that guy who has a pilot flying a cargo plane on his sig (cnt think of his name)

im a dot         blood scout          and a few more which names escape


matt             flatirion


the rest of you just love ripping threads apart and making a mockery of the bb

ill look in time too time and itll be the same few players mocking the interlectual as my self and others ive mentioned , i think its jealousy, they dont like progression , and if they where alive during wilbur wrights day , we could still not have a machine in which we call a aircraft, as they would say "itll never work" ,  " only birds can fly" , what a spam idea , you must be trolling , etc etc etc, its the same stuff , no improvement just rip it up and start again basicly  :salute
Title: Re: The Space Battleship Yamato and supporting fighters
Post by: FLS on January 27, 2012, 07:02:05 AM
Did not see squadron strength. It is Darth Vader's TIE Advanced x1, which was prototype that never saw production, and had only 1 built. It did however lead to the development of the TIE Avenger.


Maybe as a perked variant?

Edit: Off topic but it would be cool if the energy weapon beams matched the country colors.
Title: Re: The Space Battleship Yamato and supporting fighters
Post by: RTHolmes on January 27, 2012, 08:08:14 AM
... itll be the same few players mocking the interlectual ...

priceless :lol
Title: Re: The Space Battleship Yamato and supporting fighters
Post by: dirtdart on January 27, 2012, 08:10:45 AM
ok ok i get the point , i wont waste any more time trying to improve gameplay....the rest of you just love ripping threads apart and making a mockery of the bb

Davidwales, to be fair, the worst of the flamers (they know who they are) have frankly not engaged you for whatever reason and you have been spared their wrath.  Your points on systems and gameplay do not meet the basic criteria for inclusion on the BBs.  I would suggest you seek out the criteria for wishlist first, then once you understand it, find something that meets the criteria, research it on the BBs.  If it has not been asked for in the past, or at least within the last few years, then run with it.  Just be aware that there are some serious Aviation and WWII historians on these pages.

FLS, man it would be cool if tracers did that, much less lasers.  I think the Tie fighter might have stability issues in the atmosphere.  I have not seen Tie fighters in a stall fight.  
Title: Re: The Space Battleship Yamato and supporting fighters
Post by: guncrasher on January 27, 2012, 01:37:17 PM
because of their shape tie fighters would be very slow in the lower atmosphere.  I believe they are mainly used as high alt fighters in the thin air above 100k, so they would all be rooks :uhoh.  the x and y wing fighters on the other hand would be useful to hunt those pesky 262's that annoy the crap out of me.


semp
Title: Re: The Space Battleship Yamato and supporting fighters
Post by: dirtdart on January 27, 2012, 01:43:49 PM
Hmm...

AT-AT could replace KT.

Snowspeeder could replace IL-2
Title: Re: The Space Battleship Yamato and supporting fighters
Post by: davidwales on January 27, 2012, 01:53:42 PM
well i reported you all to skuzzy as you are being flamboint , not like me, i said to skuzzy all i was hoping as if a few of you took me seriously to make the game a bit more interesting without to much expence as htc has not got  a bottomless pocket, to make all these different aircraft you all wish for , you have to look at the most basic ideas , not so much art work , and reconfig of aircrft mods etc , my ideas were genuine , i messed up once with the stupid flying wing , but you should not have cruisified me for that, all i was doing was trying to make it a better htc 4 u , i wont be posting any more ideas , so some of you will be glad , but like i said to skuzzy you will always moan , and it must be a total nightmare , choosing a correct idea from the bb with all the hissing cats and total petty feuds , and nastyness you guys generate, i just hope you all learn by your mistakes , thank you so much for nothing ,and i hope things settle down in your petty brains   :salute
Title: Re: The Space Battleship Yamato and supporting fighters
Post by: Babalonian on January 27, 2012, 03:41:01 PM
Davidwales, to be fair, the worst of the flamers (they know who they are) have frankly not engaged you for whatever reason and you have been spared their wrath.  Your points on systems and gameplay do not meet the basic criteria for inclusion on the BBs.  I would suggest you seek out the criteria for wishlist first, then once you understand it, find something that meets the criteria, research it on the BBs.  If it has not been asked for in the past, or at least within the last few years, then run with it.  Just be aware that there are some serious Aviation and WWII historians on these pages.

FLS, man it would be cool if tracers did that, much less lasers.  I think the Tie fighter might have stability issues in the atmosphere.  I have not seen Tie fighters in a stall fight. 

Most have been straight-up nice.  :aok  :ahand


well i reported you all to skuzzy as you are being flamboint , not like me, i said to skuzzy all i was hoping as if a few of you took me seriously to make the game a bit more interesting without to much expence as htc has not got  a bottomless pocket, to make all these different aircraft you all wish for , you have to look at the most basic ideas , not so much art work , and reconfig of aircrft mods etc , my ideas were genuine , i messed up once with the stupid flying wing , but you should not have cruisified me for that, all i was doing was trying to make it a better htc 4 u , i wont be posting any more ideas , so some of you will be glad , but like i said to skuzzy you will always moan , and it must be a total nightmare , choosing a correct idea from the bb with all the hissing cats and total petty feuds , and nastyness you guys generate, i just hope you all learn by your mistakes , thank you so much for nothing ,and i hope things settle down in your petty brains   :salute

Bold words with much weight invested behind them from somebody that couldn't even bother reading our forum's posting rules stickied at the top of each forum.  I'd be careful whos living room rug you're relieving yourself on here, especialy since, as it is being repeatedly pointed out to you, we're being relatively nice, helpful and outgoing twords you.  But here, *tosses a bigger stick with a sharper point*, go ahead.  He loves babysitting.

(http://i675.photobucket.com/albums/vv115/Babalon84/AH%20Junk/Skampers.jpg)
Title: Re: The Space Battleship Yamato and supporting fighters
Post by: AHTbolt on January 27, 2012, 04:04:53 PM
Y "TOUCHDOWN"!!!!!!!!
Title: Re: The Space Battleship Yamato and supporting fighters
Post by: Tupac on January 27, 2012, 04:06:42 PM
 :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl

OMG LOLOLOL
Title: Re: The Space Battleship Yamato and supporting fighters
Post by: caldera on January 27, 2012, 04:24:18 PM
I think the Rooks already have the Comet Empire in high orbit as their main base.   ;)
Title: Re: The Space Battleship Yamato and supporting fighters
Post by: davidwales on January 27, 2012, 05:33:43 PM
babalonian you are also on ze lizt  :rock

(http://img190.imageshack.us/img190/719/tribodejahruc3adnasdaba.jpg)
Title: Re: The Space Battleship Yamato and supporting fighters
Post by: smoe on January 27, 2012, 05:48:03 PM
hulu.com (http://hulu.com)

See this site for episodes.

Personally I believe the USS Enterprise CVN-6 would have been a better choice for Starblazers.
Title: Re: The Space Battleship Yamato and supporting fighters
Post by: davidwales on January 27, 2012, 06:14:39 PM
babilonian been looking at all your posts not only do you talk it, you are good at writing it also  :rock


(http://img837.imageshack.us/img837/1016/accqrjcalbol67cad250eoc.jpg)
Title: Re: The Space Battleship Yamato and supporting fighters
Post by: Tupac on January 27, 2012, 06:15:52 PM
This is getting good.
Title: Re: The Space Battleship Yamato and supporting fighters
Post by: mbailey on January 27, 2012, 06:55:50 PM
well i reported you all to skuzzy as you are being flamboint , not like me, i said to skuzzy all i was hoping as if a few of you took me seriously to make the game a bit more interesting without to much expence as htc has not got  a bottomless pocket, to make all these different aircraft you all wish for , you have to look at the most basic ideas , not so much art work , and reconfig of aircrft mods etc , my ideas were genuine , i messed up once with the stupid flying wing , but you should not have cruisified me for that, all i was doing was trying to make it a better htc 4 u , i wont be posting any more ideas , so some of you will be glad , but like i said to skuzzy you will always moan , and it must be a total nightmare , choosing a correct idea from the bb with all the hissing cats and total petty feuds , and nastyness you guys generate, i just hope you all learn by your mistakes , thank you so much for nothing ,and i hope things settle down in your petty brains   :salute

Man thats alot of commas  :D

Loved that cartoon growing up Dirtdart........just watched a few episodes on Netflix  :lol

Heres a cartoon from your past, remember this one?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e2jjCMgGOYw


Title: Re: The Space Battleship Yamato and supporting fighters
Post by: Tupac on January 27, 2012, 06:57:49 PM
Man thats alot of commas  :D

Also a frightening lack of capital letters.
Title: Re: The Space Battleship Yamato and supporting fighters
Post by: TwinBoom on January 27, 2012, 07:31:27 PM
New Starblazer movie set for April 2012
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jT0gXgITiEU&feature=related (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jT0gXgITiEU&feature=related)
Title: Re: The Space Battleship Yamato and supporting fighters
Post by: Babalonian on January 27, 2012, 07:42:21 PM
That's OK David.   :aok   As this venn diagram clearly illustrates -

(http://i675.photobucket.com/albums/vv115/Babalon84/AH%20Junk/venn.png)

It only means that we can (someday) be freinds!
Title: Re: The Space Battleship Yamato and supporting fighters
Post by: davidwales on January 28, 2012, 04:19:35 AM
Well Babylon i really take my hat of to you , you seem very dedicated !


You even Practice flying your me 262 in your spare time  :D see below   :D

(http://img214.imageshack.us/img214/6752/15650large.jpg)



Title: Re: The Space Battleship Yamato and supporting fighters
Post by: dirtdart on January 28, 2012, 07:14:42 AM
Man there were some great cartoons..... cheesy, but great. 

Davidwales, I went to your website and perused around, everything is perfectly clear to me now. 
Title: Re: The Space Battleship Yamato and supporting fighters
Post by: Fish42 on January 28, 2012, 07:53:32 AM
Hmm...

AT-AT could replace KT.

Snowspeeder could replace IL-2

The B-Wing would replace the 110g and the A-Wing would take over from the LA7. Y-Wing would be a 30+eny Fighter/bomber..
(http://images.wikia.com/starwars/images/7/71/BWingsKillISD2-ST.jpg)
(http://images.wikia.com/starwars/images/c/c7/MCQ-awing.jpg)(http://images.wikia.com/starwars/images/1/1f/BTL-B_Y-wing.jpg)

Of course the Tie Defender would have to be added as a late war fighter for the Empire, to keep the their pilots happy.

(http://images.wikia.com/starwars/images/0/07/Defender.jpg)

lol, yeah I used to be really into star wars
Title: Re: The Space Battleship Yamato and supporting fighters
Post by: davidwales on January 28, 2012, 08:55:23 AM
(http://img408.imageshack.us/img408/6752/15650large.jpg)


live long and prosper  :rock
Title: Re: The Space Battleship Yamato and supporting fighters
Post by: Raphael on January 28, 2012, 10:18:48 AM
is that you in the picture?

I mean.. it totally makes sense.
Title: Re: The Space Battleship Yamato and supporting fighters
Post by: davidwales on January 28, 2012, 10:20:14 AM
i dont fly with the pigs :salute
Title: Re: The Space Battleship Yamato and supporting fighters
Post by: 321BAR on January 28, 2012, 10:31:27 AM
My only response to someone who would know that...

(http://www.demotivationalposters.org/image/demotivational-poster/small/1004/arguing-on-the-internet-nerds-demotivational-poster-1271429492.jpg)
im a closet nerd. yes the tie fighter advanced was used in squadron strength just not in the movies :D